Principal results of a randomised open label exploratory, safety and tolerability study with calmangafodipir in patients treated with a 12 h regimen of N-acetylcysteine for paracetamol overdose (POP trial).

BACKGROUND: The POP Trial was a phase 1, open-label, rising-dose, randomised study that explored the safety and tolerability of calmangafodipir (superoxide dismutase mimetic) co-treatment with n-acetylcysteine (NAC) for paracetamol overdose. METHODS: Patients were recruited at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (8th June 2017-10th May 2018). Inclusion criterion: adults within 24 h of a paracetamol overdose that required NAC. Within each of 3 sequential cohorts, participants were randomly assigned, with concealed allocation, to NAC and a single intravenous calmangafodipir dose (n = 6) or NAC alone (n = 2). Calmangafodipir doses were 2, 5, or 10 µmol/kg. Participants, study and clinical teams were not blinded. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes were alanine transaminase (ALT), international normalised ratio (INR), keratin-18, caspase-cleaved keratin-18 (ccK18), microRNA-122, and glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH). (Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03177395). FINDINGS: All 24 participants received their allocated drug doses and were analysed. Primary endpoints: all participants experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), most commonly gastrointestinal. Patients experiencing ≥1 serious adverse event (SAE): NAC alone, 2/6; NAC + calmangafodipir (2 µmol/kg), 4/6; NAC + calmangafodipir (5 µmol/kg), 2/6; NAC + calmangafodipir (10 µmol/kg), 3/6. No AEs or SAEs were probably or definitely calmangafodipir-related. Secondary safety outcomes demonstrated no differences between groups. With NAC alone, 2/6 had ALT > 100 U/L; with NAC + calmangafodipir, 0/18. No INR difference. Keratin-18 and ccK18 increased in the NAC alone group more than with calmangafodipir (baseline to 20 h fold change, NAC + calmangafodipir (5 µmol/kg) compared to NAC alone: 0.48 (95%CI 0.28-0.83)). microRNA-122 changes were similar to K18, GLDH was frequently undetected. INTERPRETATION: Calmangafodipir was tolerated when combined with NAC and may reduce biomarkers of paracetamol toxicity.

Effect of glucagon-like peptide-2 exposure on bone resorption: Effectiveness of high concentration versus prolonged exposure.

OBJECTIVE: In healthy subjects, subcutaneous injections of GLP-2 have been shown to elicit dose-related decrease in the bone resorption marker, carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), and have been proposed for the treatment of osteoporosis. This study investigated the relation between GLP-2 exposure and decreases in CTX in order to determine whether high concentrations or prolonged exposure was the most effective mode of administration. High GLP-2 concentrations resulted from iv bolus injections, whereas a more protracted stimulation was obtained by subcutaneous injections and the addition of an inhibitor of GLP-2 degradation, a DPP-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight healthy subjects were given: a) three intravenous injections of GLP-2 of 0.1, 0.4 and 0.8nmol/kg, b) one subcutaneous injection of 1.6mg GLP-2 and c) one subcutaneous injection of 1.6mg GLP-2 preceded by an intake of sitagliptin. Blood was sampled for measurements of GLP-2 and p-CTX after each intervention. RESULTS: The 0.1, 0.4 and 0.8nmol/kg GLP-2 injections dose-dependently elevated plasma GLP-2 concentrations and decreased CTX, but the decrease was similar regardless of dose. Subcutaneous GLP-2 caused a much more prolonged exposure (with a peak concentration corresponding to 0.4nmol/kg IV) and was associated with a stronger and a more prolonged suppression of CTX, but in spite of significantly increasing exposure, the administration of sitagliptin, had no additional effect. CONCLUSION: The high concentrations obtained by iv administration were less effective with respect to CTX suppression than the prolonged exposure (with much lower peak concentrations). GLP-2 agonists for osteoporosis treatment should therefore be long-acting for best efficacy.

Feeding and bone.

Diurnal variation in bone turnover is responsive to feeding and fasting, and feeding results in an acute decrease in bone resorption. These responses may be governed by multiple intermediary systems, and investigation of these systems has led to new potential therapeutic agents for osteoporosis. Here we review the current understanding of the mediators of bone turnover response to feeding, including calcitropic hormones, cortisol, gut peptides and pancreatic peptides. We also discuss the results of clinical trials of analogues of ghrelin, amylin and GLP-2 in the treatment of low bone density, and the potential bone effects of GLP-1 mimetics that are used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Four-month treatment with GLP-2 significantly increases hip BMD: a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study in postmenopausal women with low BMD.

We have previously shown that repeated dosing of glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) at 10 p.m. in postmenopausal women for 14 days results in a dose-dependent decrease in the nocturnal bone resorption, as assessed by s-CTX. In contrast, bone formation, as assessed by serum osteocalcin, appeared to be unaffected by treatment with exogenous GLP-2, at least over 14 days. The present study extends the observation period to four months. The study was a double-blind placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial comparing three different doses of GLP-2 (0.4 mg, 1.6 mg and 3.2 mg GLP-2, administered nightly) against a saline control injection. We examined safety and tolerability, and the effects on biochemical markers of bone turnover and the effect on bone mineral density. Injection of 0.4 mg, 1.6 mg and 3.2 mg GLP-2 resulted in similar reduction in the nocturnal rise of s-CTX, at Treatment Day 120 the mean difference to placebo was approximately -150%*h at AUC(0-10H) (P<0.01). Osteocalcin levels were unaffected in the 10-hour period after injection indicating that injections of 0.4 mg, 1.6 mg and 3.2 mg GLP-2 do not exert any acute stimulatory or inhibitory effect on bone formation. Treatment with GLP-2 resulted in a significant dose-dependent increase in total hip BMD over the course of the study that for the 3.2 mg GLP-2 group reached 1.1% (P=0.007) from baseline. The overall rates of adverse events in the 4 treatment groups were similar and there were no signs of tachyphylaxis or antibodies against GLP-2. The results indicate that GLP-2 produces a substantial decrease in bone resorption without suppression of bone formation thereby changing the bone remodeling balance in favor of bone formation, particularly at the hip.

Selective monitoring of vitamin D2 and D3 supplementation with a highly specific 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 immunoassay with negligible cross-reactivity to 25-hydroxyvitamin D2.

BACKGROUND: The effects of vitamin D2 and D3 supplementation on circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D3 require reliable analytical tools for specific determination of 25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D2. We have developed a highly specific 25-OH Vitamin D3 ELISA with negligible cross-reactivity towards 25(OH)D2. METHODS: 25(OH)D3 concentrations were measured in several study participants; 1) 641 healthy men and women; 2) 39 postmenopausal women receiving 400-800 IU vitamin D3 daily for 4 months; 3) 45 men and women with hip fracture receiving 1000 IU vitamin D2 daily for 3 months. RESULTS: This 25-OH Vitamin D3 ELISA had minimal cross-reactivity to 25(OH)D2, (0.7%), and demonstrated a high correlation (r2 = 0.93) with 25(OH)D3 determined by HPLC. 25(OH)D3 increased by 14% in subjects receiving vitamin D3 for 4 months (p < 0.01), whereas there was no significant change in 25(OH)D3 levels in those receiving vitamin D2. CONCLUSIONS: We report that 25(OH)D3 ELISA was used for evaluation of 25(OH)D3 concentrations in subjects receiving vitamin D2 and D3 supplementation. The increase of 25(OH)D3 in circulation with vitamin D3 supplementation and lack of increase with vitamin D2 supplementation suggest that this assay has sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be used as a reliable measurement of nutritional vitamin D3 status in humans.

Reduction in bone resorption by exogenous glucagon-like peptide-2 administration requires an intact gastrointestinal tract.

OBJECTIVE: Biochemical markers for bone resorption (s-CTX) are reduced by food intake, whereas markers for bone formation seem to be unaffected by meal status. Glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) is a peptide secreted from endocrine L cells in the intestinal mucosa in relation to food-intake. Subcutaneous GLP-2 treatment has been shown to reduce bone resorption in postmenopausal women. The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of exogenous GLP-2 to reduce bone resorption in patients with jejunostomy or ileostomy and to elucidate whether an intact gastrointestinal tract and the ability to secrete GLP-2 are required for meal-induced inhibition of bone resorption. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen control subjects, 13 colectomized patients with an ileostomy and 12 colectomized patients with a jejunostomy (remnant small bowel 89 +/- 53 cm) were given: a) a subcutaneous injection of 1600 microg GLP-2, b) placebo and c) 3.8 MJ of a breakfast meal. Blood was sampled for measurements of s-CTX, s-osteocalcin and GLP-2 for 4 h after each intervention. RESULTS: After the GLP-2 injection, only control subjects showed a significant reduction in s-CTX (24% +/- 13%, p = 0.05, 120 min) compared with baseline values. Patients with an ileostomy had a preserved endogenous postprandial GLP-2 secretion, which was absent in patients with a jejunostomy. Consumption of a meal reduced s-CTX in all groups but significantly less so in the jejunostomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in bone resorption by exogenous GLP-2 require an intact gastrointestinal tract. The decreased meal-induced inhibition of bone resorption in the jejunostomy patients, who lack a GLP-2 response, supports the view that GLP-2 plays a role in postprandial reduction in bone resorption.

Effects of treatment with glucagon-like peptide-2 on bone resorption in colectomized patients with distal ileostomy or jejunostomy and short-bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The gut hormone GLP-2 (glucagon-like peptide-2) seems to be involved in the circadian pattern of bone resorption, whereas parathyroid hormone (PTH) is an established key hormone in bone turnover. Endogenous GLP-2 secretion is lacking in colectomized patients with short-bowel syndrome (SBS) and they have reduced bone mineral density (BMD). The aim of the study was to investigate the anti-resorptive effect (assessed by s-CTX) of 14 days of GLP-2 treatment in these patients and to determine whether 56 days of treatment would improve BMD. PTH secretion in response to GLP-2 was also investigated in colectomized SBS patients and colectomized controls (with ileostomy). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight SBS patients and 13 patients with ileostomy were treated with subcutaneous injections of 1600 microg GLP-2 at bedtime for 56 and 14 consecutive days, respectively. BMD was determined at days 1 and 56 in SBS patients. On days 1 and 14, measurements of CTX, P1NP and PTH were taken 4 h after the GLP-2 injection. RESULTS: Patients with ileostomy showed a significant reduction in bone resorption after GLP-2 injections at days 1 and 14. In contrast, there was no change in s-CTX after 1 and 14 days in the SBS patients, and after 56 days of GLP-2 treatment there was no improvement in BMD. A significant reduction in PTH secretion in response to GLP-2 was observed only in patients with ileostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased bone resorption in response to GLP-2 injections cannot be elicited in SBS patients and therefore precludes treatment of their osteopenia with GLP-2. The anti-resorptive response to GLP-2 seems to require an intact small intestine and may involve suppression of PTH secretion.

Bone resorption is decreased postprandially by intestinal factors and glucagon-like peptide-2 is a possible candidate.

OBJECTIVE: Food intake inhibits bone resorption by a mechanism thought to involve gut hormones, and the intestinotrophic glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) is a candidate because exogenous GLP-2 inhibits bone resorption in humans. The purpose of the study was to investigate patients with short-bowel syndrome (SBS) or total gastrectomy in order to elucidate whether the signal for the meal-induced reduction of bone resorption is initiated from the stomach or the intestine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bone resorption was assessed from the serum concentration of collagen type I C-telopeptide cross-links (s-CTX) and compared with the plasma concentrations of GLP-2. Bone formation was assessed from serum osteocalcin concentrations. Seven SBS patients with a preserved colon and 7 with SBS and colectomy and 7 healthy controls were given a breakfast test meal (936 kcal). Eight patients who had undergone total gastrectomy had an oral glucose load (75 g in 150 ml). RESULTS: The SBS patients without a colon showed no reduction in bone resorption (s-CTX) to a meal, whereas SBS patients with a colon had an intermediate response with a 27% (p<0.05) reduction of s-CTX from baseline after 120 min as compared with 66% (p<0.001) for normal controls. A significant reduction of 53% (p<0.001) was seen in gastrectomized patients after receiving oral glucose, which is comparable with the published data for the oral glucose tolerance test (OGGT) in healthy subjects (50% reduction over 120 min). Bone formation was unchanged for both SBS and gastrectomy patients. GLP-2 concentrations increased significantly in all groups with the exception of the SBS plus colectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: An intestinal factor is responsible for the postprandial reduction in bone resorption, and our findings are compatible with such a function for GLP-2.

Disassociation of bone resorption and formation by GLP-2: a 14-day study in healthy postmenopausal women.

We have previously shown that a single subcutaneous injection of glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) at 10 p.m. in postmenopausal women results in a dose-dependent decrease in the nocturnal serum and urine concentrations of fragments derived from the degradation of the C-terminal telopeptide region of collagen type I (s-CTX and u-CTX) and u-DPD, markers of bone resorption. In contrast, bone formation, as assessed by serum osteocalcin and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), appeared to be unaffected by treatment with exogenous GLP-2. These effects were further investigated in a 14-day study. The aim was to demonstrate that a parenteral formulation of GLP-2 is safe and well tolerated after repeated dosing in healthy postmenopausal women for 14 days. It was further investigated whether the effects on bone turnover markers were sustained throughout the study period. The study was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 60 postmenopausal women and 2 different doses of GLP-2 (1.6 mg and 3.2 mg GLP-2) against a saline control. The data for bone resorption revealed a similar reduction on Day 1 and Day 14, both based on time course and AUC. There were no signs of tachyphylaxis and no serious adverse reaction. Both GLP-2 doses resulted in similar and significant (p<0.001) reduction in bone resorption indicating that the maximum efficacious dose has been approached. Osteocalcin and PINP levels were unaffected at Day 1 and Day 14, suggesting a disassociation between bone resorption and bone formation during GLP-2 treatment.

Characterization of osteoclasts derived from CD14+ monocytes isolated from peripheral blood.

Bone resorption is solely mediated by osteoclasts. Therefore, a pure osteoclast population is of high interest for the investigation of biological aspects of the osteoclasts, such as the direct effect of growth factors and hormones, as well as for testing and characterizing inhibitors of bone resorption. We have established a pure, stable, and reproducible system for purification of human osteoclasts from peripheral blood. We isolated CD14-positive (CD14+) monocytes using anti-CD14-coated beads. After isolation, the monocytes are differentiated into mature osteoclasts by stimulation with macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL). Osteoclast formation was only observed in the CD14+ population, not in the CD14- population, and only in the presence of both M-CSF and RANKL, confirming that the CD14+ system is a pure population of osteoclast precursors. No expression of osteoclast markers was observed in the absence of RANKL, whereas RANKL dose-dependently induced the expression of cathepsin K, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP), and matrix metallo proteinase (MMP)-9. Furthermore, morphological characterization of the cells demonstrated that actin rings were only formed in the presence of RANKL. Moreover, the osteoclasts were capable of forming acidic resorption lacunae, and inhibitors of lysosomal acidification attenuated this process. Finally, we measured the response to known bone resorption inhibitors, and found that the osteoclasts were sensitive to these and thereby provided a robust and valid method for interpretation of the effect of antiresorptive compounds. In conclusion, we have established a robust assay for developing osteoclasts that can be used to study several biological aspects of the osteoclasts and which in combination with the resorption marker CTX-I provides a useful tool for evaluating osteoclast function in vitro.

New serum biochemical markers (Coll 2-1 and Coll 2-1 NO2) for studying oxidative-related type II collagen network degradation in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Protein nitration is a prominent feature of inflammatory processes in the joint. We have developed immunoassays specific for a peptide of the alpha-helical region of type II collagen 108HRGYPGLDG116 (Coll 2-1) and its nitrated form 108HRGY(NO2)PGLDG116 (Coll 2-1 NO2) in biological fluids. DESIGN: Coll 2-1 and Coll 2-1 NO2 peptides were injected into rabbits. Two antisera (D3 and D37) were selected for their specificity and affinity and used to develop specific immunoassays. Coll 2-1 and Coll 2-1 NO2 were measured in sera of 242 healthy subjects (N), 67 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis (OA) and 19 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RESULTS: In healthy subjects, Coll 2-1 and Coll 2-1 NO2 concentrations were 125.13+/-3.71 nM and 0.16+/-0.08 nM, respectively. In OA and RA, Coll 2-1 and Coll 2-1 NO2 serum levels were found to be significantly increased compared to controls of the same range of age (Coll 2-1: OA: 200.80+/-8.98 nM, RA: 172.30+/-19.05 nM, normal: 126.60+/-6.70 nM and Coll 2-1 NO2: OA: 0.26+/-0.02, RA: 0.38+/-0.05, normal: 0.12+/-0.01 nM). Coll 2-1 NO2 levels were significantly more elevated in RA than in OA patients (P<0.05). As a consequence, the ratio Coll 2-1 NO2/Coll 2-1 was 1.6 times higher in RA than in OA subjects. No relationship was found between the radiological OA severity and the levels of Coll 2-1 and Coll 2-1 NO2 in serum. Coll 2-1 NO2, but not Coll 2-1, was correlated with C-reactive protein in the sera of OA and RA patients. CONCLUSIONS: The determination of both Coll 2-1 and Coll 2-1 NO2 in serum of arthritic patients seems to be a promising useful tool for the detection of oxidative-related cartilage degradation episode. Further, these markers could be helpful for monitoring the effects of anti-inflammatory or antioxidant drugs on cartilage degradation.

Reduction of nocturnal rise in bone resorption by subcutaneous GLP-2.

We have previously shown that a subcutaneous injection of glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) at 9 a.m. in fasting postmenopausal women results in a dose-dependent decrease in the serum concentration of fragments derived from the degradation of the C-terminal telopeptide region of collagen type I (s-CTX), a marker of bone resorption. In contrast, GLP-2 was found to have a neutral effect on bone formation, as assessed by serum osteocalcin. Since increased s-CTX levels are normally observed at night, we conducted bedtime studies in healthy postmenopausal women. The objective was to study the effect of GLP-2 injection on bone turnover given at bedtime. A total of 81 postmenopausal women were included in two randomised placebo-controlled studies. In conclusion, we found a dose-related reduction of s-CTX after injection of GLP-2 (P < 0.05) and osteocalcin levels was increased as compared to placebo (P = 0.07) by the treatment, suggestive of a stimulative effect on bone formation. An area under the curve (AUC0-10 h) analysis for s-CTX after GLP-2 injection confirmed the dose-related decrease as compared to placebo (P < 0.05).

Role of gastrointestinal hormones in postprandial reduction of bone resorption.

UNLABELLED: Collagen type I fragments, reflecting bone resorption, and release of gut hormones were investigated after a meal. Investigations led to a dose escalation study with glucagon like peptide-2 (GLP-2) in postmenopausal women. We found a dose-dependent effect of GLP-2 on the reduction of bone resorption. INTRODUCTION: The C-terminal telopeptide region of type I collagen as measured in serum (s-CTX) can be used to assess bone resorption. This marker of bone resorption has a significant circadian variation that is influenced by food intake. However, the mediator of this variation has not been identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the release of the gut hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2; a representative of the intestinal proglucagon-derived peptides) after ingestion of glucose, fat, protein, and fructose, as well as their effects after parenteral administration in relation to bone turnover processes in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, we studied the effect on bone turnover of a single subcutaneous injection of GLP-2 in four different dosages (100, 200, 400, or 800 microg GLP-2) or placebo in 60 postmenopausal women (mean age, 61 +/- 5 years). RESULTS: All macronutrients significantly (p < 0.05) reduced bone resorption as assessed by s-CTX (39-52% from baseline), and only the glucagon-like peptides were secreted in parallel. Parenteral administration of GIP and GLP-1 did not result in a reduction of the s-CTX level, whereas GLP-2 caused a statistically significant and dose-dependent reduction in the s-CTX level from baseline compared with placebo (p < 0.05). Urine DPD/creatinine, a marker of bone resorption, was significantly reduced by 25% from baseline in the 800-microg GLP-2 group (p < 0.01). An area under the curve (AUC(0-8h)) analysis for s-CTX after GLP-2 injection confirmed the dose-dependent decrease (ANOVA, p = 0.05). The s-osteocalcin level was unaffected by the GLP-2 treatment. CONCLUSION: These studies exclude both GIP and GLP-1 as key mediators for the immediate reduction in bone resorption seen after a meal. The dose-dependent reduction of bone resorption markers found after subcutaneous injection of GLP-2 warrants further investigation into the mechanism and importance of GLP-2 for the bone turnover processes.