Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Emerg Med Australas ; 34(6): 1019-1020, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36378261

ABSTRACT

Emergency physicians often experience significant cognitive load and task interruptions in the ED. This combination results in cognitive errors and poor patient outcomes. Quality research about this topic is scarce. Raising awareness of personal thinking processes (metacognition) is one way of reducing the unfavourable impact of task interruptions on cognition.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Metacognition , Humans , Emergency Service, Hospital , Cognition
2.
Seizure ; 93: 160-168, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34768179

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Seizure-related presentations or suspected seizures, (i.e. epileptic seizures, PNES, cardiogenic and acute symptomatic seizures) comprise 1.9% of the entire caseload for the Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust,United Kingdom in 2020. Patients with suspected seizures who are diagnosed in the emergency department (ED) require appropriate immediate management and a robust follow-up pathway. National audits conducted in the United Kingdom (UK) (NASH 1, 2 and 3) have highlighted the wide intersite variability in care provided towards patients with suspected seizures and the need for better organised and accessible care. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to improve patient safety by ensuring a streamlined referral process from the ED and subsequently reducing the risk of loss to follow-up. METHODS: This QI project used the Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI) model for improvement to drive change and Lewin's change management model to guide stakeholder interaction. The project started in 2018 and employed three distinct Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to drive improvement. The outcome measure was waiting time to be seen at the first seizure clinic from ED discharge. RESULTS: The median waiting time pre-QI was 65.0 days (range 37 days to 163 days), and the median waiting time post-intervention was 31.0 days (range 8 days to 175 days). Using log-transformed data, the reduction in mean daily waiting time following the introduction of the intervention was statistically significant at the 5% significance level (t30.9 = 9.42; p<0.001). Process measures were met with 100% compliance. Post-intervention period, there was a 4.1% (10/243) rejection rate of referrals from the ED by the neurology services. However, the project failed to meet NICE's recommendation of a waiting time of 14 days to be seen in the first seizure clinic. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This QI project has made significant improvements in the management of patients presenting with suspected seizures to the ED's at MYHT. Additionally, the project has provided opportunities for development of new protocols, cost savings and patient advice leaflets. Teamwork and organisational skills played a crucial part in the outcome of this QI project. The use of a theory-driven change management strategy was key to managing a large organisation with multiple stakeholders.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Quality Improvement , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...