Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Clin Sports Med ; 42(3): 491-514, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37208061

ABSTRACT

Sports participation is a leading cause of catastrophic cervical spine injury (CSI) in the United States. Appropriate prehospital care for athletes with suspected CSIs should be available at all levels of sport. Planning the process of transport for home venues before the start of the season and ensuring that a medical time out occurs at home and away games can reduce complications of transport decisions on the field of play and expedite transport of the spine-injured athlete.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Spinal Injuries , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Spinal Injuries/diagnosis , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Transportation of Patients , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Physical Examination
3.
Clin J Sport Med ; 30(4): 296-304, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32639439

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sports participation is among the leading causes of catastrophic cervical spine injury (CSI) in the United States. Appropriate prehospital care for athletes with suspected CSIs should be available at all levels of sport. The goal of this project was to develop a set of best-practice recommendations appropriate for athletic trainers, emergency responders, sports medicine and emergency physicians, and others engaged in caring for athletes with suspected CSIs. METHODS: A consensus-driven approach (RAND/UCLA method) in combination with a systematic review of the available literature was used to identify key research questions and develop conclusions and recommendations on the prehospital care of the spine-injured athlete. A diverse panel of experts, including members of the National Athletic Trainers' Association, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, and the Sports Institute at UW Medicine participated in 4 Delphi rounds and a 2-day nominal group technique (NGT) meeting. The systematic review involved 2 independent reviewers and 4 rounds of blinded review. RESULTS: The Delphi process identified 8 key questions to be answered by the systematic review. The systematic review comprised 1544 studies, 49 of which were included in the final full-text review. Using the results of the systematic review as a shared evidence base, the NGT meeting created and refined conclusions and recommendations until consensus was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: These conclusions and recommendations represent a pragmatic approach, balancing expert experiences and the available scientific evidence.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Delphi Technique , Device Removal , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Emergency Responders/education , Head Protective Devices , Humans , Protective Devices , Restraint, Physical , Spinal Injuries/prevention & control , Transportation of Patients , United States
4.
J Athl Train ; 55(6): 563-572, 2020 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32579668

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sports participation is among the leading causes of catastrophic cervical spine injury (CSI) in the United States. Appropriate prehospital care for athletes with suspected CSIs should be available at all levels of sport. The goal of this project was to develop a set of best-practice recommendations appropriate for athletic trainers, emergency responders, sports medicine and emergency physicians, and others engaged in caring for athletes with suspected CSIs. METHODS: A consensus-driven approach (RAND/UCLA method) in combination with a systematic review of the available literature was used to identify key research questions and develop conclusions and recommendations on the prehospital care of the spine-injured athlete. A diverse panel of experts, including members of the National Athletic Trainers' Association, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, and the Sports Institute at UW Medicine participated in 4 Delphi rounds and a 2-day nominal group technique meeting. The systematic review involved 2 independent reviewers and 4 rounds of blinded review. RESULTS: The Delphi process identified 8 key questions to be answered by the systematic review. The systematic review comprised 1544 studies, 49 of which were included in the final full-text review. Using the results of the systematic review as a shared evidence base, the nominal group technique meeting created and refined conclusions and recommendations until consensus was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: These conclusions and recommendations represent a pragmatic approach, balancing expert experiences and the available scientific evidence.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/therapy , Emergency Medical Services , Football/injuries , Neck Injuries/therapy , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Sports Medicine , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Humans , Sports Medicine/methods , Sports Medicine/standards , United States
5.
J Athl Train ; 55(6): 545-562, 2020 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32579669

ABSTRACT

Sport-related spine injury can be devastating and have long-lasting effects on athletes and their families. Providing evidence-based care for patients with spine injury is essential for optimizing postinjury outcomes. When caring for an injured athlete in American tackle football, clinicians must make decisions that involve unique challenges related to protective equipment (eg, helmet and shoulder pads). The Spine Injury in Sport Group (SISG) met in Atlanta, Georgia, March 2-3, 2019, and involved 25 health care professionals with expertise in emergency medicine, sports medicine, neurologic surgery, orthopaedic surgery, neurology, physiatry, athletic training, and research to review the current literature and discuss evidence-based medicine, best practices, and care options available for the prehospital treatment of athletes with suspected cervical spine injuries.1,2 That meeting and the subsequent Mills et al publication delineate the quality and quantity of published evidence regarding many aspects of prehospital care for the athlete with a suspected cervical spine injury. This paper offers a practical treatment guide based on the experience of those who attended the Atlanta meeting as well as the evidence presented in the Mills et al article. Ongoing research will help to further advance clinical treatment recommendations.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Emergency Medical Services , First Aid , Football/injuries , Spinal Injuries , Transportation of Patients , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Benchmarking , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , First Aid/methods , First Aid/standards , Georgia , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Spinal Injuries/epidemiology , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Sports Medicine/standards , Transportation of Patients/methods , Transportation of Patients/standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...