Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor Under General Anesthesia: Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is an incisionless therapy for the treatment of medication-resistant essential tremor. Although its safety and efficacy has been demonstrated, MRgFUS is typically performed with the patient awake, with intraprocedural neurological assessments to guide lesioning. OBJECTIVE: To report the first case of MRgFUS thalamotomy under general anesthesia in a patient whose medical comorbidities prohibit him from being in a supine position without a secured airway. METHODS: The dentatorubrothalamic tract was directly targeted. Two sonications reaching lesional temperatures (≥54°C) were delivered without any complications. RESULTS: Lesioning was confirmed on intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and the patient experienced 89% improvement in his tremor postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This demonstrates the safety and feasibility of MRgFUS thalamotomy under general anesthesia without the benefit of intraprocedural neurological assessments.

Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor in the Setting of Prior Craniotomy.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is a rapidly evolving therapy for the treatment of essential tremor. Although the skull is a major determinant of the delivery of acoustic energy to the target, how the presence of a prior craniotomy must be accounted for during lesioning is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate novel application of this therapeutic option in a patient with a history of prior craniotomies for unrelated intracranial pathologies. METHODS: A 55-yr-old man with a history of right frontal craniotomy for resection of a colloid cyst underwent a left ventrointermedius nucleus thalamotomy through MRgFUS. The prior craniotomy flap was not excluded in the treatment plan; however, all bony defects and hardware were marked as "no-pass" regions. Clinical outcomes were collected at the 6-mo follow-up. RESULTS: Transducer elements whose acoustic paths would have been altered by the craniotomy defect were turned off. Sonications reaching lesional temperatures of up to 56°C were successfully delivered. The procedure was well-tolerated, without any persistent intra-ablation or postablation adverse effects. The presence of a lesion was confirmed on MRI, which was associated with a significant reduction in the patient's tremor that was sustained at the 6-mo follow-up. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the safety and efficacy of MRgFUS thalamotomy in a patient with prior craniotomies and highlights our strategy for acoustic lesioning in this setting.

Patient-specific effects on sonication heating efficiency during magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy.

PURPOSE: During magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy for refractory tremor, high temperatures must be achieved and sustained for tissue necrosis. We assessed the impact of both patient-specific as well as procedure-related factors on the efficiency of acoustic energy transfer, or heating efficiency (HE). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 92 consecutive patients (857 sonications) with essential tremor or tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease treated at a single institution. Temperature elevations at the target were measured for each sonication with MR thermometry. HE of each sonication was defined as the ratio of peak temperature elevation and the delivered energy. HE was analyzed with respect to patient skull features (area, thickness, skull density ratio [SDR]), computed from CT scans, as well as demographic and clinical variables (age, sex, diagnosis, and duration of symptoms). RESULTS: Across the full range of sonication energies that can be delivered with current devices (up to 36 kJ), average sonication HE was diminished in patients with lower SDR. In individual subjects, there was a progressive loss in HE as sonication energy was titrated up throughout the course of treatment, with a more rapid decline in patients with higher SDR. This energy-dependent loss in HE was not related to procedural factors, namely, the number of previous sonications, or the cumulative energy deposited during previous sonications. In contrast to SDR, neither skull area nor thickness was an independent predictor of average HE or the rate of its decline with increasing energies. In 11% of patients, all of whom with SDR < 0.45, sonication HE fell below the threshold to reach 54°C even with delivery of maximum energy. In contrast, temperatures ≥ 50°C could be obtained in all but one patient. CONCLUSIONS: SDR is predictive of sonication HE, and determines patient-specific limits on the magnitude of temperature elevation that can be achieved with current devices. These data inform strategies for predictable lesioning in MRgFUS thalamotomy.