Case Report: Treatment of Renal Artery Aneurysms by Ex Vivo Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair and Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery aneurysms are increasingly being detected incidentally during diagnostic imaging using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or angiography performed for evaluation of other diseases. Our understanding of their natural history and surgical management has evolved significantly during the past two decades. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients with incidentally identified renal artery aneurysms have been referred to our renal transplantation program in the last 3 years. All three had aneurysms located at renal artery branches making endovascular repair challenging and thus underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy with ex vivo aneurysmectomy, with heterotopic autotransplantation in two cases and allotransplantation in the third case. RESULTS: All three cases resulted in successful renal artery aneurysm repair and reimplantation and good renal function of the implanted kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy with ex vivo aneurysm repair and reimplantation can be a successful approach to surgical management, especially in cases where the aneurysm involves multiple artery branches and endovascular repair is challenging. Given the excellent results with this surgical approach, living and deceased donor kidneys with aneurysms should be strongly encouraged if deemed reparable.

Key role for CD4 T cells during mixed antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts.

We utilized mouse models to elucidate the immunologic mechanisms of functional graft loss during mixed antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts (mixed AMR), in which humoral and cellular responses to the graft occur concomitantly. Although the majority of T cells in the graft at the time of rejection were CD8 T cells with only a minor population of CD4 T cells, depletion of CD4 but not CD8 cells prevented acute graft loss during mixed AMR. CD4 depletion eliminated antidonor alloantibodies and conferred protection from destruction of renal allografts. ELISPOT revealed that CD4 T effectors responded to donor alloantigens by both the direct and indirect pathways of allorecognition. In transfer studies, CD4 T effectors primed to donor alloantigens were highly effective at promoting acute graft dysfunction, and exhibited the attributes of effector T cells. Laser capture microdissection and confirmatory immunostaining studies revealed that CD4 T cells infiltrating the graft produced effector molecules with graft destructive potential. Bioluminescent imaging confirmed that CD4 T effectors traffic to the graft site in immune replete hosts. These data document that host CD4 T cells can promote acute dysfunction of renal allografts by directly mediating graft injury in addition to facilitating antidonor alloantibody responses.

Examining the value of lexical retrieval treatment in primary progressive aphasia: two positive cases.

Individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) suffer a gradual decline in communication ability as a result of neurodegenerative disease. Language treatment shows promise as a means of addressing these difficulties but much remains to be learned with regard to the potential value of treatment across variants and stages of the disorder. We present two cases, one with semantic variant of PPA and the other with logopenic PPA, each of whom underwent treatment that was unique in its focus on training self-cueing strategies to engage residual language skills. Despite differing language profiles and levels of aphasia severity, each individual benefited from treatment and showed maintenance of gains as well as generalization to untrained lexical items. These cases highlight the potential for treatment to capitalize on spared cognitive and neural systems in individuals with PPA, improving current language function as well as potentially preserving targeted skills in the face of disease progression.

Treatment for apraxia of speech in nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia.

There is a growing body of literature examining the utility of behavioral treatment in primary progressive aphasia (PPA). There are, however, no studies exploring treatment approaches to improve speech production in individuals with apraxia of speech (AOS) associated with the nonfluent variant of PPA. The purpose of this study was to examine a novel approach to treatment of AOS in nonfluent PPA. We implemented a treatment method using structured oral reading as a tool for improving production of multisyllabic words in an individual with mild AOS and nonfluent variant PPA. Our participant showed a reduction in speech errors during reading of novel text that was maintained at one year post-treatment. Generalization of improved speech production was observed on repetition of words and sentences and the participant showed stability of speech production over time in connected speech. Results suggest that oral reading treatment is an efficient and effective means of addressing multisyllabic word production in AOS associated with nonfluent PPA, with lasting and generalized treatment effects.

Report of a consensus conference on transplant program quality and surveillance.

Public reports of organ transplant program outcomes by the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients have been both groundbreaking and controversial. The reports are used by regulatory agencies, private insurance providers, transplant centers and patients. Failure to adequately adjust outcomes for risk may cause programs to avoid performing transplants involving suitable but high-risk candidates and donors. At a consensus conference of stakeholders held February 13-15, 2012, the participants recommended that program-specific reports be better designed to address the needs of all users. Additional comorbidity variables should be collected, but innovation should also be protected by excluding patients who are in approved protocols from statistical models that identify underperforming centers. The potential benefits of hierarchical and mixed-effects statistical methods should be studied. Transplant centers should be provided with tools to facilitate quality assessment and performance improvement. Additional statistical methods to assess outcomes at small-volume transplant programs should be developed. More data on waiting list risk and outcomes should be provided. Monitoring and reporting of short-term living donor outcomes should be enhanced. Overall, there was broad consensus that substantial improvement in reporting outcomes of transplant programs in the United States could and should be made in a cost-effective manner.

With respect to elderly patients: finding kidneys in the context of new allocation concepts.

The elderly have benefited from increased access to renal transplantation in recent years. New allocation concepts would shift distribution of kidneys to younger recipients, making expanded criteria and living donor kidneys more relevant for seniors. Current issues impacting expanded criteria donor kidney availability and living donor transplant opportunities for the elderly are explored. It is hoped that the kidney donor profile index will improve risk assessment and utilization of marginal kidneys. The usefulness of procurement biopsy remains controversial. Dual kidney transplantation and machine perfusion appear to be effective mechanisms to increase organ availability. "Old-for-old" allocation systems, donation service area variation and regulatory and reimbursement issues highlight disparities and disincentives affecting expanded criteria donor organ utilization, and considerations for the way forward are discussed. Living donor transplantation, even with older donors, may provide the best option for elderly recipients, and careful expansion of the living donor pool appears appropriate. In light of new allocation concepts, it will be important to understand issues pertinent to seniors and develop effective strategies to maintain or improve their access to the benefits of transplantation.

Clinical outcomes of renal transplant recipients treated with enteric-coated mycophenolic acid vs. mycophenolate mofetil as a switch agent using a primary steroid-free rapamune and microemulsion cyclosporine protocol.

Since 2002 our transplant program has utilized a steroid free, cyclosporine (CSA)- and rapamycin (RAPA)-based maintenance immunosuppression regimen. In cases where it has been desirable to avoid the potential nephrotoxicity with this regimen we have used mycophenolic acid (MPA) as our "switch" drug of choice. Both mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Roche Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA) and enteric-coated MPA (ECM) (Novartis, East Hanover, NJ, USA) have been used. In this study, we retrospectively compared the tolerability of the two formulations of MPA. Thus we compared 103 recipients switched to RAPA/MMF (RMM group) to 114 switched to RAPA/ECM (REC group). There was a significantly higher incidence of patients requiring dose changes and drug discontinuation in the RMM group, as well as an increased frequency of dose changes. There were significantly more acute rejection episodes and kidney losses in the dose adjustment vs. no dose adjustment patients. However, when comparing the incidence of acute rejection and kidney loss between the RMM and REC groups, there was no significant difference. We conclude that in this cohort of recipients, the ECM formulation of MPA was better tolerated than the MMF formulation, resulting in fewer patients requiring dose adjustments or drug discontinuation.

Experimental hand pain delays recognition of the contralateral hand--evidence that acute and chronic pain have opposite effects on information processing?

Recognising the laterality of a pictured hand involves making an initial decision and confirming that choice by mentally moving one's own hand to match the picture. This depends on an intact body schema. Because patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) take longer to recognise a hand's laterality when it corresponds to their affected hand, it has been proposed that nociceptive input disrupts the body schema. However, chronic pain is associated with physiological and psychosocial complexities that may also explain the results. In three studies, we investigated whether the effect is simply due to nociceptive input. Study one evaluated the temporal and perceptual characteristics of acute hand pain elicited by intramuscular injection of hypertonic saline into the thenar eminence. In studies two and three, subjects performed a hand laterality recognition task before, during, and after acute experimental hand pain, and experimental elbow pain, respectively. During hand pain and during elbow pain, when the laterality of the pictured hand corresponded to the painful side, there was no effect on response time (RT). That suggests that nociceptive input alone is not sufficient to disrupt the working body schema. Conversely to patients with CRPS1, when the laterality of the pictured hand corresponded to the non-painful hand, RT increased approximately 380 ms (95% confidence interval 190 ms-590 ms). The results highlight the differences between acute and chronic pain and may reflect a bias in information processing in acute pain toward the affected part.

A randomized prospective trial of OKT3 induction in the current immunosuppression era.

Recent improvements in immunosuppression and subsequent decreases in the incidence of acute rejection have brought into question the benefit of the use peri-transplant antibody therapy (i.e. induction therapy). In the current era of immunosuppression that includes mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine emulsion (Neoral, Novartis, Basle, Switzerland), we designed and have completed a prospective, randomized trial to address this question. Cadaveric and living donor renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive either OKT3/MMF/delayed Neoral/prednisone or MMF/immediate Neoral/prednisone without OKT3. The incidence of rejection episodes was the primary end point. Patients with delayed graft function were excluded. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven and all patients have been followed for a minimum of 2 yr. Fifty-four patients received OKT3 induction, of which 6 patients suffered a rejection episode (11%), while 13 patients (27%) not receiving OKT3 (p=0.04) had a rejection episode. Four patients in the no OKT3 group suffered multiple rejections, while there were only 2 with more than one episode in the OKT3 group. There was no increased incidence of infectious complications in the group receiving OKT3. Hospital costs tended to be higher in the OKT3-treated group, but were not significantly different. The low incidence of rejection in the OKT3-treated group was intriguing and validates the use of antibody therapy in the early post-operative periods even in the era of improved baseline immunosuppression.

Pancreas transplantation in Ohio: a 15-year outcomes analysis.

BACKGROUND: Beginning in 1984, all pancreas transplantations performed in the state of Ohio have been tracked by the Ohio Solid Organ Transplantation Consortium (OSOTC). In this study the outcomes of these transplantations were compared across 3 eras to determine whether increasing experience has been beneficial. METHODS: Between July 1984 and December 1999, 765 kidney-pancreas (KPTx) and 76 pancreas only (Ptx) transplantations were performed. Outcomes measures for these 841 pancreas transplantations were compared over 3 eras, 1984 to 1989, 1990 to 1994, and 1995 to 1999. RESULTS: One-year patient survivals for KPTx patients were 87%, 92%, and 94% in the 3 eras, respectively. Graft survival at 1 year was also markedly improved between era 1 and era 3, increasing for PTx patients from 21% to 85% and for KPTx patients from 68% to 85%. Average waiting time increased from 132 to 318 days between era 1 and era 3. Conversely, average length of stay in hospital was significantly decreased from 34 to 18 days. The cost of the procedure, as measured by hospital charges, also decreased when compared in 1985 dollars as a technique to control for inflation. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that pancreas transplantation in Ohio has become a very successful and cost-effective therapeutic intervention for patients with type I diabetes with or without concomitant end-stage renal failure.

Elevated blood pressure predicts the risk of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) is a strong predictor of renal allograft survival. Recent advances in immunosuppression have reduced considerably the incidence of AR. Still, approximately 25% of patients have AR early post-transplant, and the factors that predispose to AR have not been fully clarified. METHODS: The study includes 1641 adults, recipients of first cadaveric (CAD, N = 1195) or living related renal grafts (LRD, N = 446), transplanted in one institution. The variables associated with the occurrence of AR during the first year post-transplant were identified. RESULTS: By univariate analyses, AR was associated with the following variables: younger (P < 0.001); heavier (P = 0.003); and African American recipients (P = 0.002); CAD transplants (P = 0.001); higher number of HLA mismatches (P = 0.001); delayed graft function (DGF, P = 0.001); higher levels of serum creatinine post-transplant (P = 0.003); and higher levels of systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure (BP) post-transplant (P < 0.001). Higher BP levels were also associated with earlier AR episodes (P < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis AR was significantly associated with recipient age, number of HLA mismatches, DGF, pre-PRA and systolic BP. Analysis of BP measured weekly post-transplant indicated that elevated BP levels, even three weeks prior to the AR episode, were significantly associated with AR. For every level of BP, the use of BP medications was associated with a lower incidence of AR (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the use of calcium channel blockers was also associated with lower incidence of AR (P = 0.001). Of note, 81% of recipients whose BP increased after the transplant had AR. In contrast, 22% of patients whose BP declined post-transplant had AR. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated BP levels post-transplant identify patients at high risk of AR independently of graft function. Treatment of BP and reduction of BP levels appears to be associated with a decreased risk of AR. We hypothesize that high BP may be an indicator of a particular type of allograft damage, perhaps ischemic, that may predispose to AR.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: increasing incidence in renal allograft recipients transplanted in recent years.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a serious complication of transplantation caused by immunosuppressive drugs. In this study, we assessed the incidence of PTDM and the factors that are associated with the development of this complication. METHODS: The study population included 2078 non-DM renal allograft recipients, transplanted since 1983 in one institution. PTDM was diagnosed by the requirement of hypoglycemic medications, starting more than 30 days after transplantation. Post-transplant, all patients received cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone, but none of these patients received tacrolimus. RESULTS: At 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after transplantation, 7, 10, 13, and 21% of patients developed PTDM. By multivariate Cox, the following variables correlated with a more rapid increase in the number of PTDM cases: (1) older age (RR = 2.2 comparing patients younger or older than 45 years, P < 0.0001), (2) transplant done after 1995 (RR = 1.7, P = 0.003), (3) African American race (RR = 1.6, P = 0.003), and (4) higher body weight at transplant (RR = 1.4, P < 0.0001). Compared with before 1995, since 1995, the percentage of patients with PTDM has increased from 5.9 to 10.5% at one year and from 8.8 to 16.9% at three years. This increase was statistically independent from all other variables tested. However, since 1995, recipients have become significantly heavier (P < 0.0001) and older (P < 0.0001), and the average CsA level has increased significantly (P < 0.0001). Also, since 1995, the cumulative dose of corticosteroids has declined (P < 0.0001); patients received a newer, better absorbed preparation of CsA and received mycophenolate mofetil. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of PTDM increases continuously with time post-transplant. There has been an increase in the incidence of PTDM in patients transplanted recently, and that increase can be explained only partially by changes in the recipients' characteristics. We postulate that this increase may be due to the introduction of better absorbed CsA formulations that result in higher blood levels and higher cumulative exposure to this diabetogenic drug.

Randomized, prospective trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplantation, manifestations of renal allograft rejection typically become evident before those of pancreatic rejection. This study compared mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in prevention of renal rejection after primary SPK transplantation. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, multicenter study, patients received MMF 1.5 g twice daily (n=74) or AZA 1-3 mg/kg daily (n=76) for 1 year after transplantation. The incidence of rejection was assessed at 6 months. Adverse events were tracked through 1 year. Survival data are reported through 2 years. RESULTS: At 6 months, efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: rejection (27% vs. 39%); rejection or death (34% vs. 42%); rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal (i.e., treatment failure; 41% vs. 55%). Six-month efficacy trends favored MMF, and time to rejection or treatment failure was significantly longer when compared with AZA (P=0.049). One-year efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: treatment of renal rejection (35% vs. 47%); renal allograft loss or death (9% vs. 12%); pancreas allograft loss or death (15% vs. 14%). Five MMF patients (7%) and four (5%) in the AZA group died. More MMF than AZA patients developed opportunistic infections (54% vs. 38%), but the pathogens did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Trends for most efficacy parameters favored MMF over AZA, and time to renal allograft rejection or treatment failure was statistically significantly longer for MMF. The use of MMF in the treatment of SPK recipients is a useful advance.

Pulmonary Rhizopus infection in a diabetic renal transplant recipient.

Infectious complications after renal transplantation remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Mucormycosis is a rare infection in renal transplant recipients; however, mortality is exceedingly high. Risk factors predisposing to this disease include prolonged neutropenia, diabetes, and patients who are immunosuppressed (Singh N, Gayowski T, Singh J, Yu LV. Invasive gastrointestinal zygomycosis in a liver transplant recipient: case report and review of zygomycosis in solid-organ transplant recipients, Clin Infect Dis 1995: 20: 617). Life-threatening infections can occur, as this fungus has the propensity to invade blood vessel endothelium, resulting in hematological dissemination. We report a case of cavitary Rhizopus lung infection, 2 months after renal transplantation, where the patient was treated successfully with Amphotericin B and surgical resection of the lesions with preservation of his allograft function. In this era of intensified immunosuppression, we may see an increased incidence of mucormycosis in transplant population. Invasive diagnostic work-up is mandatory in case of suspicion; Amphotericin B and, in selected cases, surgical resection are the mainstays of therapy.

Obese living kidney donors: short-term results and possible implications.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation has increased recently as the shortage of cadaveric organs continues. This increase has occurred in part, due to expanded donor criteria, including obese patients. This is a potential concern because obesity is associated with surgical complications, possibly death, and chronic medical problems. To address this concern, we examined the outcome of a large group of obese (ObD) and nonobese living kidney donors (NObD). METHODS: A total of 107 obese (body mass index> or =27 kg/m2) and 116 nonobese (body mass index<27 kg/m2) living kidney donors donating at a single institution between 1990 and 1996 were studied. Surgical complications, operative duration, and hospital length of stay were assessed. Preoperative blood pressure, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, protein excretion, fasting glucose, and hemoglobin A1C were measured and first degree relatives with diabetes were identified. RESULTS: Overall complications were significantly more common in ObD, 16.8 vs. 3.4% (P=0.0012). The majority of complications in the entire cohort, 56%, were wound related and were significantly more common in ObD (P=0.016). There was no significant increase in nonwound-related infections, bleeding, or cardiopulmonary events. There were no deaths or major complications. Operative time was significantly longer in ObD 151+/-30 vs. 141+/-29 min (P<0.05) but hospital duration was no different. Predonation, blood pressure in ObD was significantly higher, (P<0.05) and they more often had a family history of diabetes, 46 vs. 30% (P<0.05) than nonobese donors. Renal function, proteinuria, fasting glucose, or hemoglobin A1C were no different. CONCLUSION: With prudent selection, the use of obese living kidney donors appears safe in the short term. They experience more minor complications, usually wound related, and slightly longer operations. Given a higher baseline blood pressure and family history of diabetes, the long-term effect on the remaining solitary kidney in ObD needs to be examined.

Renal allograft survival following acute rejection correlates with blood pressure levels and histopathology.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) is a strong predictor of renal graft survival, but the negative impact of AR on survival is variable, suggesting that other factors modulate this relationship. In this study, we examined the variables that correlate with graft survival after AR, particularly the impact of blood pressure (BP), graft function, and histopathology. METHODS: The study population included patients with no AR (N = 942) and patients with one (N = 407) or two (N = 156) AR during the first year post-transplant. Patients were adults who were recipients of living related (LRD, N = 410) or cadaveric grafts (CAD, N = 1095) and who were transplanted in a single institution and followed for 5.8 +/- 4 years. RESULTS: Compared with patients without AR, those with AR were significantly younger, had more human lymphocyte antigen mismatches, and included more CAD recipients. Graft survival was analyzed beyond six-months post-transplant. In patients with AR, reduced survival correlated (multivariate) with (a) younger recipients (P = 0.01), (b) AR occurring later during the first-year post-transplant (P = 0.0006), (c) elevated serum creatinine (Cr) before (P = 0.05), at the time (P = 0.0001) of, or after AR (P = 0.0004), and (d) average BP levels after AR [systolic BP (P = 0.003 logistic, P < 0.0001 by Cox), diastolic BP (P = 0.007), mean arterial pressure (P < 0.0001)]. This latter correlation was independent of graft function and recipient race. Thus, post-AR BP levels correlated with graft survival in patients with post-AR creatinine

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in renal allografts with chronic nephropathy: implications for graft survival.

De novo focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in renal allografts most often is diagnosed in association with chronic allograft nephropathy (CN). In this study, we assessed the clinical and pathological variables that correlate with the presence of de novo FSGS and the implications of FSGS for the survival of grafts with CN. The study population included 293 renal allograft recipients (52 living related donor, 241 cadaveric donor) diagnosed with CN by biopsy more than 6 months after transplantation. Patients with recurrent FSGS or FSGS associated with other glomerulopathies were excluded. FSGS was present in 87 patients with CN (30%). FSGS was diagnosed more commonly in the following groups of patients: young (P = 0.04), black (P = 0.02), and those with elevated serum cholesterol levels (P = 0.002) and/or high-grade proteinuria (P < 0. 0001, all univariate analysis). FSGS was diagnosed later after transplantation than CN without FSGS (P < 0.0001), and FSGS correlated with the presence of arteriolar hyalinosis in the biopsy specimen (P = 0.04). Compared with CN without FSGS, FSGS was associated with significantly worse death-censored graft survival (P = 0.008, univariate Cox). In addition, when we analyzed all patients with CN, graft survival correlated by multivariate analysis with the following parameters: serum creatinine level (P < 0.0001) and proteinuria (P = 0.004) at the time of diagnosis, presence of FSGS (P = 0.03), and degree of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (CN score; P < 0.0001, Cox). Of interest, the use of lipid-reducing agents was also associated with improved graft survival in patients with CN (P = 0.0002, univariate Cox), although total lipid levels were not significantly less in patients receiving these drugs. In conclusion, de novo FSGS presents late after transplantation and in association with arteriolar hyalinosis, suggesting these lesions may be related to chronic cyclosporine toxicity. In CN, the presence of FSGS and the severity of interstitial fibrosis are negative independent predictors of graft survival. The possible relationship between lipid-reducing agents and graft survival clearly needs to be examined carefully in future studies.

Patient survival after renal transplantation: II. The impact of smoking.

Renal transplant recipients have significantly higher mortality than individuals without kidney disease and the excess mortality is mainly due to cardiovascular causes. In this study, we sought to determine the impact of smoking, a major cardiovascular risk factor, on patient and renal graft survival. The study population included all adult recipients of first cadaveric kidney transplants done in our institution from 1984 to 1991. By selection, all patients were alive and had a functioning graft for at least 1 yr after transplantation. Smoking history was gathered prior to transplantation. The follow-up period was 84.3 + 41 months and during this time 28%, of the patients died and 21%, lost their graft. By univariate and multivariate analysis, patient survival, censored at the time of graft loss, correlated with these pre-transplant variables: age (p < 0.0001); diabetes (p = 0.0002); history of cigarette smoking (p = 0.004); time on dialysis prior to the transplant (p = 0.0005); and cardiomegaly by chest X-ray (p = 0.0005). Post-transplant variables did not correlate with patient mortality. By Cox regression, patient survival time was significantly shorter in diabetics (p < 0.0001), smokers (p = 0.0005), and recipients older than 40 yr. However, there were no significant differences between the survival of smokers, non-diabetics, diabetics, and older recipients. Patient death was the most common cause of renal transplant failure in smokers, in patients older than 40 yr, and in diabetics, but these patient characteristics did not correlate with graft survival. The prevalence of different causes of death was not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers. In conclusion, a history of cigarette smoking correlates with decreased patient survival after transplantation, and the magnitude of the negative impact of smoking in renal transplant recipients is quantitatively similar to that of diabetes.