Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Genet Couns ; 2023 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877326

ABSTRACT

Cascade testing, the site-specific genetic testing of relatives within families with an inherited condition, is underutilized. Long wait times for appointments in specialty genetics clinics are a known barrier to genetic testing access. In our cancer genetics, New Patient Clinic (NPC), the long wait time for an appointment (on average 5 months for routine referrals), was identified by both providers and patients as a barrier to uptake of cascade testing. Timely testing of at-risk relatives is essential to maximize the benefits of cascade testing and reduce cancer morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to improve access via implementation of a different clinical model that designated appointments for patients seeking cascade testing. A secondary goal was to improve use of genetic counselor time. We implemented a dedicated Cascade Testing Clinic (CTC) with an expedited triaging and unique scheduling model to decrease patient wait time to appointment and optimize clinician time. We report on the process and outcomes here. Between October 2016 and February 2020, the average wait time between referral date and first scheduled appointment date was 46 days for the CTC compared to 144 days for the NPC (p < 0.0001). No-show/cancelation/rescheduling rate was 11.7% in the CTC compared to 29.7% in the NPC (p < 0.0001). Genetic counselors saw approximately twice as many patients per half-day clinic in the CTC compared to the NPC (p < 0.00001). Modifications to clinic staffing and appointment times were made based on provider feedback. Implementation of a dedicated clinic specifically for patients seeking cascade testing significantly shortened wait times for this population, reduced patient drop-off, and improved clinician efficiency. The relatively straightforward indications and generally uncomplicated medical histories made this an ideal population for expedited appointments.

2.
Am J Cancer Res ; 13(1): 236-244, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36777509

ABSTRACT

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) is an autosomal dominant condition attributed to pathogenic variants in fumarate hydratase (FH) and presents with cutaneous leiomyomas (CLMs), uterine leiomyomas (ULMs) and renal cell cancer (RCC). The objective of this study was to characterize the spectrum of clinical and genetic findings in HLRCC at a large academic tertiary care referral center with a focus on dermatologic manifestations. Fifty-seven patients, 41 female and 16 male, with 27 unique pathogenic or likely-pathogenic FH variants were identified from 38 families. Mean age of HLRCC diagnosis was 44.4 years (range 8-82). CLMs were the primary reason for referral in 49.1% (n=28). CLMs were present in 43/56 patients who underwent full skin examination. Three of these 56 patients were diagnosed with cutaneous leiomyosarcoma. Incidence of ULMs was 37/41 female patients; no uterine leiomyosarcomas were observed. RCC was observed in 6/57 patients (mean age of diagnosis: 47.3 years (range 28-79)). CLMs predated RCC in the 3 patients diagnosed with both. Dermatologists have an opportunity to recognize cutaneous manifestations of HLRCC, including cutaneous leiomyomas and rarely cutaneous leiomyosarcomas, and refer for genetic evaluation to provide definitive diagnosis. Identification of HLRCC can promote family cascade testing and screening for RCC.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...