Application of the iBox prognostication system as a surrogate endpoint in the TRANSFORM randomised controlled trial: proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVES: Development of pharmaceutical agents in transplantation is currently limited by long waits for hard endpoints. We applied a validated integrative risk-prognostication system integrative Box (iBox) as a surrogate endpoint to the TRANSFORM Study, a large randomised controlled trial, to project individual patient long-term kidney allograft survival from 1 year to 11 years after randomisation. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of a randomised open-label controlled trial. SETTING: Multicentre study including 186 centres in 42 countries worldwide. PARTICIPANTS: 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) or mycophenolic acid with standard-exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The iBox scores were computed for each participant at 1 year after randomisation using functional, immunological and histological parameters. Individual long-term death-censored allograft survival over 4, 6 and 11 years after randomisation was projected with the iBox risk-prognostication system. RESULTS: Overall, 940 patients receiving EVR+rCNI and 932 receiving MPA+sCNI completed the 1-year visit. iBox scores generated at 1 year yielded graft survival prediction rates of 90.9% vs 92.1%, 87.9% vs 89.5%, and 80.0% vs 82.4% in the EVR+rCNI versus MPA+sCNI arms at 4, 6, and 11 years post-randomisation, respectively (all differences below the 10% non-inferiority margin defined by study protocol). Inclusion of immunological and histological Banff diagnoses parameters in iBox scores resulted in comparable and non-inferior predicted graft survival for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study provides the first application of a validated prognostication system as a surrogate endpoint in the field of transplantation. The iBox system, by projecting kidney allograft survival up to 11 years post-randomisation, confirms the non-inferiority of EVR+rCNI versus MPA+sCNI regimen. Given the current process engaged for surrogate endpoints qualification, this study illustrates the potential to fast track development of pharmaceutical agents. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TRANSFORM trial: NCT01950819.iBox prognostication system: NCT03474003.

Wound healing adverse events in kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure or current standard-of-care: insights from the 24-month TRANSFORM study.

OBJECTIVES: In TRANSFORM, de novo kidney transplant recipients received either everolimus in combination with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) at standard EVR pre-dose concentrations of 3-8 ng/mL or mycophenolic acid plus standard-exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI). The authors analyzed the incidence of wound healing adverse events (WHAEs) over the 2-year study period 15. METHODS: Patients were randomized to either EVR+rCNI or MPA+sCNI, both combined with induction therapy and steroids 19. RESULTS: The safety population consisted of 2,026 patients (EVR+rCNI: 1,014, MPA+sCNI: 1,012). The proportion of patients with at least 1 WHAE was comparable between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI treatment groups [20.6% vs. 17.3%; risk ratio (RR): 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.43] at month 24. The numerical difference between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI was mainly caused by an increased proportion of EVR patients with lymphocele and wound dehiscence [7.5% vs. 5.1% (RR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.05) and 3.9% vs. 1.8% (RR: 2.22; 95%CI: 1.28, 3.84), respectively] 20. CONCLUSION: The immediate introduction of EVR+rCNI after kidney transplantation was associated with an overall comparable incidence of WHAEs versus current standard-of-care over the 24-month study period. There was an increased relative risk of experiencing lymphocele and wound dehiscence but the absolute risks were rather low in both groups 21. CT.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01950819.

"Early" and "Late" Hospital readmissions in the first year after kidney transplant at a single center.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission (HR) after surgery is considered a quality metric. METHODS: Data on 2371 first-time adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients were collected to analyze the "early" (≤30 days) and "late" (31-365 days) HR patterns after KT at a single center over a 12-year time span (2002-2013). RESULTS: 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year HR were 31%, 41%, and 53%, respectively. Risk factors for HR included age >50, female sex, black race, BMI >30, transplant LOS >5 days, and pre-transplant time on dialysis >765 days. Indications for early (n = 749) and late (n = 508) HR were similar. Early HR (OR: 3.80, P = .007) and black race (OR: 2.38, P = .009) were associated with higher odds of 1-year graft failure while frequency (1-2, 3-4, 5+) of HR (ORs: 4.68, 8.36, 9.44, P < .001) and age > 50 (OR: 2.11, P = .007) were associated with higher odds of 1-year mortality. Transplant LOS > 5 days increased both odds of 1-year graft failure (OR: 3.51, P = .001) and mortality (OR: 2.05, P = .006). One-year graft and recipient survival were 96.7% and 94.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmission was associated with reduced graft and patient survival; however, despite a relatively high and consistent HR rate after KT, overall 1-year graft and patient survival was high.

Evidence-based practice: Guidance for using everolimus in combination with low-exposure calcineurin inhibitors as initial immunosuppression in kidney transplant patients.

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus, in combination with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), has been demonstrated in clinical trials to have comparable efficacy in low-to-moderate immunological risk kidney transplant recipients to the Standard of Care, mycophenolic acid (MPA) in combination with standard-exposure CNI. Current treatment guidelines consider mTOR inhibitors to be a second-line therapy in the majority of cases; however, given that everolimus-based regimens are associated with a reduced rate of viral infections after transplantation, their wider use could have great benefits for kidney transplant patients. In this evidence-based practice guideline, we consider the de novo use of everolimus in kidney transplant recipients. The main outcomes of our consideration of the available evidence are that: 1. Everolimus, in combination with reduced-exposure CNI and low dose steroids, is a suitable regimen for the prophylaxis of kidney transplant rejection in the majority of low-to-moderate immunological risk adult patients, with individualized management; 2. Induction with either basiliximab or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin is an effective therapy for kidney transplant recipients when initiating an everolimus-based, reduced-exposure CNI regimen; and 3. An individualized approach should be adopted when managing kidney transplant recipients on everolimus-based therapy.

Two-year outcomes in de novo renal transplant recipients receiving everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor reduction regimen from the TRANSFORM study.

TRANSFORM (TRANSplant eFficacy and safety Outcomes with an eveRolimus-based regiMen) was a 24-month, prospective, open-label trial in 2037 de novo renal transplant recipients randomized (1:1) within 24 hours of transplantation to receive everolimus (EVR) with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR + rCNI) or mycophenolate with standard-exposure CNI. Consistent with previously reported 12-month findings, noninferiority of the EVR + rCNI regimen for the primary endpoint of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 mL/min per 1.73 m2 was achieved at month 24 (47.9% vs 43.7%; difference = 4.2%; 95% confidence interval = -0.3, 8.7; P = .006). Mean eGFR was stable up to month 24 (52.6 vs 54.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2 ) in both arms. The incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) was lower in the EVR + rCNI arm (12.3% vs 17.6%) among on-treatment patients. Although discontinuation rates due to adverse events were higher with EVR + rCNI (27.2% vs 15.0%), rates of cytomegalovirus (2.8% vs 13.5%) and BK virus (5.8% vs 10.3%) infections were lower. Cytomegalovirus infection rates were significantly lower with EVR + rCNI even in the D+/R- high-risk group (P < .0001). In conclusion, the EVR + rCNI regimen offers comparable efficacy and graft function with low tBPAR and dnDSA rates and significantly lower incidence of viral infections relative to standard-of-care up to 24 months. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01950819.

Enterovesical Fistula After Enteric Conversion of a Bladder-Drained Pancreatic Allograft: A Case Report.

Since the inception of pancreas transplant as a treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus, there has been considerable debate about the best way to manage exocrine secretions and monitor patients for graft rejection. For patients who undergo bladder exocrine drainage of a pancreatic allograft, a bladder-to-enteric drainage conversion can serve as a rescue procedure in case of anastomotic leaks or other complications. However, this procedure is associated with its own complications, including a rarely described enterovesical fistula. Here we report on a 45-year-old man who underwent a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant with bladder drainage to the latter. He developed a pancreatic allograft duodenal leak (duodenal-vesical anastomosis) requiring a bladder-to-enteric drainage conversion. The patient returned 2 weeks after discharge with an enterovesical fistula. He was treated nonsurgically with intravenous antibiotics, bowel rest, and parenteral nutrition, and the fistula successfully closed in approximately 2 weeks. Overall, enterovesical fistula formation is a rare but treatable complication that can occur after a bladder-to-enteric drainage conversion of a pancreatic transplant allograft. It can be managed nonsurgically, which is preferable in these immunocompromised patients.

Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation.

Background Everolimus permits reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, but the efficacy and safety outcomes of this treatment after kidney transplant require confirmation.Methods In a multicenter noninferiority trial, we randomized 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients to receive, in combination with induction therapy and corticosteroids, everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (everolimus arm) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (MPA arm). The primary end point was treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or eGFR<50 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at post-transplant month 12 using a 10% noninferiority margin.Results In the intent-to-treat population (everolimus n=1022, MPA n=1015), the primary end point incidence was 48.2% (493) with everolimus and 45.1% (457) with MPA (difference 3.2%; 95% confidence interval, -1.3% to 7.6%). Similar between-treatment differences in incidence were observed in the subgroups of patients who received tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death at post-transplant month 12 occurred in 14.9% and 12.5% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively (difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, -1.7% to 6.4%). De novo donor-specific antibody incidence at 12 months and antibody-mediated rejection rate did not differ between arms. Cytomegalovirus (3.6% versus 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% versus 8.0%) were less frequent in the everolimus arm than in the MPA arm. Overall, 23.0% and 11.9% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively, discontinued the study drug because of adverse events.Conclusions In kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, everolimus was noninferior to MPA for a binary composite end point assessing immunosuppressive efficacy and preservation of graft function.

Clinical utility of C3d binding donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody detection by single antigen beads after kidney transplantation-a retrospective study.

Development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after renal transplantation is known to be associated with worse graft survival, yet determining which specificities in which recipients are the most deleterious remains under investigation. This study evaluated the relationship of the complement binding capacity of post-transplant de novo anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies with subsequent clinical outcome. Stored sera from 265 recipients previously identified as having de novo DSA were retested for DSA and their C3d binding capacity using Luminex-based solid-phase assays. Most recipients had anti-HLA class II-reactive DSA (class I = 12.5%, class II = 68.7%, class I and class II = 18.9%). The recipients that had C3d binding DSA (67.5%) had a significantly higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and any rejection. They also had significantly lower kidney survival, with the lowest survival in those that had both anti-HLA class I and class II C3d binding DSA. Concurrent biopsy comparison revealed a 96.2% positive predictive value and 47.4% negative predictive value for C4d peritubular capillary (Ptc) deposition. Anti-HLA class I and class II C3d binding DSA carried a twofold and 1.5-fold increased risk of kidney loss, respectively, in multivariate analysis.

Establishing patient-specific criteria for selecting the optimal upper extremity vascular access procedure.

OBJECTIVE: The Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative and Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative call for the indiscriminate creation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) without providing patient-specific criteria for vascular access selection. Although the U.S. AVF rate has increased dramatically, several reports have found that this singular focus on increasing AVFs has resulted in increased AVF nonmaturation/early failure and a high prevalence of catheter dependence. The objective of this study was to determine the appropriateness of vascular access procedures in clinical scenarios constructed with combinations of relevant factors potentially influencing outcomes. METHODS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used. Accordingly, a comprehensive literature search was performed and a synthesis of results compiled. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was applied to 2088 AVF and 1728 AVG clinical scenarios with varying patient characteristics. Eleven international vascular access experts rated the appropriateness of each scenario in two rounds. On the basis of the distribution of the panelists' scores, each scenario was determined to be appropriate, inappropriate, or indeterminate. RESULTS: Panelists achieved agreement in 2964 (77.7%) scenarios; 860 (41%) AVF and 588 (34%) AVG scenarios were scored appropriate, 686 (33%) AVF and 480 (28%) AVG scenarios were scored inappropriate, and 542 (26%) AVF and 660 (38%) AVG scenarios were indeterminate. Younger age, larger outflow vein diameter, normal or obese body mass index (vs morbidly obese), larger inflow artery diameter, and higher patient functional status were associated with appropriateness of AVF creation. Older age, dialysis dependence, and smaller vein size were associated with appropriateness of AVG creation. Gender, diabetes, and coronary artery disease were not associated with AVF or AVG appropriateness. Dialysis status was not associated with AVF appropriateness. Body mass index and functional status were not associated with AVG appropriateness. To simulate the surgeon's decision-making, scenarios were combined to create situations with the same patient characteristics and both AVF and AVG options for access. Of these 864 clinical situations, 311 (36%) were rated appropriate for AVG but inappropriate or indeterminate for AVF. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that patient-specific situations exist wherein AVG is as appropriate as or more appropriate than AVF. These results provide patient-specific recommendations for clinicians to optimize vascular access selection criteria, to standardize care, and to inform payers and policy. Indeterminate scenarios will guide future research.

Evaluation of Flagging Criteria of United States Kidney Transplant Center Performance: How to Best Define Outliers?

BACKGROUND: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients report cards of US organ transplant center performance are publicly available and used for quality oversight. Low center performance (LP) evaluations are associated with changes in practice including reduced transplant rates and increased waitlist removals. In 2014, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients implemented new Bayesian methodology to evaluate performance which was not adopted by Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). In May 2016, CMS altered their performance criteria, reducing the likelihood of LP evaluations. METHODS: Our aims were to evaluate incidence, survival rates, and volume of LP centers with Bayesian, historical (old-CMS) and new-CMS criteria using 6 consecutive program-specific reports (PSR), January 2013 to July 2015 among adult kidney transplant centers. RESULTS: Bayesian, old-CMS and new-CMS criteria identified 13.4%, 8.3%, and 6.1% LP PSRs, respectively. Over the 3-year period, 31.9% (Bayesian), 23.4% (old-CMS), and 19.8% (new-CMS) of centers had 1 or more LP evaluation. For small centers (<83 transplants/PSR), there were 4-fold additional LP evaluations (52 vs 13 PSRs) for 1-year mortality with Bayesian versus new-CMS criteria. For large centers (>183 transplants/PSR), there were 3-fold additional LP evaluations for 1-year mortality with Bayesian versus new-CMS criteria with median differences in observed and expected patient survival of -1.6% and -2.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of kidney transplant centers are identified as low performing with relatively small survival differences compared with expected. Bayesian criteria have significantly higher flagging rates and new-CMS criteria modestly reduce flagging. Critical appraisal of performance criteria is needed to assess whether quality oversight is meeting intended goals and whether further modifications could reduce risk aversion, more efficiently allocate resources, and increase transplant opportunities.

High mortality in diabetic recipients of high KDPI deceased donor kidneys.

BACKGROUND: Deceased donor (DD) kidney quality is determined by calculating the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). Optimizing high KDPI (≥85%) DD transplant outcome is challenging. This retrospective study was performed to review our high KDPI DD transplant results to identify clinical practices that can improve future outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively calculated the KDPI for 895 DD kidney recipients transplanted between 1/2002 and 11/2013. Age, race, body mass index (BMI), retransplantation, gender, diabetes (DM), dialysis time, and preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) (previous myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass (CABG), or stenting) were determined for all recipients. RESULTS: About 29.7% (266/895) of transplants were from donors with a KDPI ≥85%. By Cox regression older age, diabetes, female gender, and dialysis time >4 years correlated with shorter patient survival time. Diabetics with CAD who received a high KDPI donor kidney had a significantly increased risk of death (HR 4.33 (CI 1.82-10.30), P=.001) compared to low KDPI kidney recipients. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve for diabetic recipients of high KDPI kidneys was significantly worse if they had preexisting CAD (P<.001 by log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Patient survival using high KDPI donor kidneys may be improved by avoiding diabetic candidates with preexisting CAD.

Refractory Hypotension after Liver Allograft Reperfusion: A Case of Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction.

Hypotension after reperfusion is a common occurrence during liver transplantation following the systemic release of cold, hyperkalemic, and acidic contents of the liver allograft. Moreover, the release of vasoactive metabolites such as inflammatory cytokines and free radicals from the liver and mesentery, compounded by the hepatic uptake of blood, may also cause a decrement in systemic perfusion pressures. Thus, the postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) can materialize if hypotension and fibrinolysis occur concomitantly within 5 min of reperfusion. Treatment of the PRS may require the administration of inotropes, vasopressors, and intravenous fluids to maintain hemodynamic stability. However, the occurrence of the PRS and its treatment with inotropes and calcium chloride may lead to dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (DLVOTO) precipitating refractory hypotension. Expedient diagnosis of DLVOTO with transesophageal echocardiography is extremely vital in order to avoid potential cardiovascular collapse during this critical period.

Early immunosuppression treatment correlates with later de novo donor-specific antibody development after kidney and pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) post-transplant correlate with a higher risk of immunologic graft injury and loss following kidney and pancreas transplantation. Post-transplant dnDSA can occur within the first post-transplant year. METHODS: In this study, 817 of 1290 kidney and simultaneous kidney/pancreas recipients were tested for dnDSA post-transplant. Recipient immunosuppressive treatment at one, three, six, and 12 months post-transplant was correlated with dnDSA incidence by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The overall incidence of dnDSA was 21.3% detected a median of 3.5 yr post-transplant. By univariate analysis, the immunosuppressive treatment at all time points correlated with dnDSA (p < 0.01). Month 6 treatment correlated best in multivariable analysis (p = 0.004). At six months, recipients receiving rapamune/mycophenolic acid (Rapa/MPA) had the highest dnDSA incidence at five yr (25.3%) and last follow-up (30.7%), those treated with cyclosporine/rapamune (CNI/Rapa) had the lowest incidence at five yr (10.8%) and last follow-up (18.6%), and cyclosporine/mycophenolic acid (CNI/MPA) treatment had an intermediate incidence at five yr (16.7%) and last follow-up (20.4%) (p < 0.01). Six-month CNI/MPA and Rapa/MPA treatment significantly correlated with dnDSA (hazard ratios of 2.36 and 1.80, respectively) by Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. CONCLUSION: The risk of post-transplant dnDSA development correlates with early immunosuppressive management.

Preservation solutions used during abdominal transplantation: Current status and outcomes.

Organ preservation remains an important contributing factor to graft and patient outcomes. During donor organ procurement and transportation, cellular injury is mitigated through the use of preservation solutions in conjunction with hypothermia. Various preservation solutions and protocols exist with widespread variability among transplant centers. In this review of abdominal organ preservation solutions, evolution of transplantation and graft preservation are discussed followed by classification of preservation solutions according to the composition of electrolytes, impermeants, buffers, antioxidants, and energy precursors. Lastly, pertinent clinical studies in the setting of hepatic, renal, pancreas, and intestinal transplantation are reviewed for patient and graft survival as well as financial considerations. In liver transplants there may be some benefit with the use of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) over University of Wisconsin solution in terms of biliary complications and potential cost savings. Renal grafts may experience increased initial graft dysfunction with the use of Euro-Collins thereby dissuading its use in support of HTK which can lead to substantial cost savings. University of Wisconsin solution and Celsior are favored in pancreas transplants given the concern for pancreatitis and graft thrombosis associated with HTK. No difference was observed with preservation solutions with respect to graft and patient survival in liver, renal, and pancreas transplants. Studies involving intestinal transplants are sparse but University of Wisconsin solution infused intraluminally in combination with an intra-vascular washout is a reasonable option until further evidence can be generated. Available literature can be used to ameliorate extensive variation across centers while potentially minimizing graft dysfunction and improving associated costs.

Rituximab, Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin as Effective Platinum-Based Salvage Chemotherapy for Periportal Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder After an Orthotopic Liver Transplant.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is a group of heterogenous disorders that occur after solid-organ transplant. The overall incidence is between 1% and 20%. In orthotopic liver transplant recipients, the reported incidence ranges from 2% to 10%, while the incidence is greater in children (9.7%-11%) and lesser in adults (1.7%-3%). The following treatment options are considered for patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: reduction of immunosuppression, single-agent rituximab, rituximab and chemotherapy, surgery and radiation, antivirals targeted at the Epstein-Barr virus, and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes targeting the Epstein-Barr virus. This report describes a 61-year-old man who presented after an orthotopic liver transplant with a large periportal soft tissue mass that was shown on biopsy to be a monomorphic, CD20+, diffuse, large B-cell lymphoma, nongerminal center type. He was treated with reduced immunosuppression, followed by single-agent rituximab, then with an anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen: rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, doxorubicin, and then a platinum-based salvage chemotherapy with rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin with a good response.

Effects of cardiovascular comorbidity adjustment on SRTR risk-adjusted cox proportional hazard models of graft survival.

BACKGROUND: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) determine expected graft survivals to identify potentially underperforming transplant centers. There has been recent interest in evaluating adjustments for comorbidities when performing these calculations. This study was performed to determine the influence that adjustment for pre-transplant cardiovascular disease comorbidity can have on risk-adjusted Cox models, such as those used by SRTR and CMS. METHODS: We analyzed Cox proportional hazards models for 1-year and 3-year graft survival for kidney recipients from a single center where cardiovascular disease covariates were added to a baseline model derived by using the SRTR calculated risk scores and including all standard SRTR parameters. RESULTS: Living and deceased donor recipient 1-year and living donor 3-year Cox models that included all seven covariates demonstrated 8% to 13% improved discrimination. Only the 1-year deceased donor recipient Cox model demonstrated significantly improved calibration (likelihood ratio test P=0.038). The expected graft losses increased by >30% for living donor recipients at 1 and 3 years and decreased by 2% to 4% for deceased donor recipients at 1 and 3 years. CONCLUSION: SRTR and CMS use of pre-transplant cardiovascular comorbidity adjustment might impact center performance evaluations.

Acute pyelonephritis in renal allografts: a new role for microRNAs?

BACKGROUND: Acute pyelonephritis (APN) versus acute rejection (AR) is a frequently encountered diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma in kidney transplants. Variable culture results, overlapping histologic features, and persistent graft dysfunction despite antibiotics are frequently encountered. Therefore, we explored the utility of intragraft microRNA profiles to distinguish between allograft APN and AR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2011, we identified 49 patients with biopsy features of APN, within the first 2 years posttransplant. MicroRNA profiling was performed on 20 biopsies (normal kidney, n=4; unequivocal AR, n=5; features of APN, n=11). RESULTS: Only 32% (16/49) of the patients had concomitant positive urine cultures at biopsy, and in 8 of 16 patients, colony count was less than 10 CFU/mL. In 14 of 49 patients, positive urine culture did not coincide with the biopsy, and in 19 of 49 patients, urine cultures were negative. On microRNA profiling, good clustering was seen among the normal kidneys and among AR biopsies. Among the 11 biopsies with features of APN, 4 biopsies showed good clustering with a pattern distinct from AR; (these patients recovered graft function with antibiotics); 7 of 11 biopsies showed heterogeneity in microRNA profiles and variable outcomes with antibiotic treatment. We identified a panel of 25 microRNAs showing statistical difference in expression between AR and APN. MiR-99b, miR-23b let-7b-5p, miR-30a, and miR-145 were validated using qPCR. CONCLUSION: Allograft pyelonephritis can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. A gestalt approach is required. In addition to histology and cultures, differential intragraft microRNA expression may prove helpful to distinguish APN from AR in renal allograft biopsies.

Improving medication administration safety in solid organ transplant patients through barcode-assisted medication administration.

Solid organ transplant recipients are prescribed a high number of medications, increasing the potential for medication errors. Barcode-assisted medication administration (BCMA) is technology that reduces medication administration errors. An observational study was conducted at an academic medical center solid organ transplant unit before and after BMCA implementation. Medication accuracy was determined and administration errors were categorized by type and therapeutic class of medication. A baseline medication administration error rate of 4.8% was observed with wrong dose errors representing 78% of the errors. During the post-BCMA period the medication administration error rate was reduced by 68% to 1.5% (P = .0001). Wrong dose errors were reduced by 67% (P = .001), and unauthorized medication administrations were reduced by 73%. Steroids were associated with the highest error rate. The results of this study suggest that routinely adopting BCMA has the potential to reduce medication administration errors in transplant patients.

Cardiac stress test as a risk-stratification tool for posttransplant cardiac outcomes in diabetic kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The utility of cardiac stress testing as a risk-stratification tool before kidney transplantation remains debatable owing to discordance with coronary angiography and outcome yields at different centers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 273 diabetic kidney transplant recipients from 2006 to 2010. By protocol, all diabetic patients underwent pharmacological radionucleotide stress test or dobutamine stress echocardiography before transplant. We compared the 1-year cardiac outcomes between those with negative stress test results and those with positive stress test results. RESULTS: Patients with a positive stress test result (n=67) underwent coronary angiogram, and significant coronary artery disease (≥70% coronary stenosis) was found in 35 (52.2%) patients. Of the latter, 32 (91.4%) underwent cardiac revascularization (24 underwent cardiac stenting and 8 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting). The rest (n=35) were treated medically. Within 1 year after transplant, the group with positive stress test results experienced more cardiac events (34.3% vs. 3.9%, P<0.001) including acute myocardial infarction (22.4% vs. 3.4%, P<0.001) and ventricular arrhythmias (8.9% vs. 0.05%, P=0.001), higher all-cause mortality (19.4% vs. 4.8%, P<0.001), and cardiac mortality (17.9% vs. 0.9%, P<0.001) compared with the group with negative stress test results. CONCLUSIONS: In this diabetic population, stress testing showed positive and negative predictive values of 34.3% and 96.1%, respectively. Pharmacological cardiac stress testing provided excellent risk stratification in diabetic kidney transplant recipients.