ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important public health problem. This arrhythmia is common and associated with a high risk of stroke. Further, appropriate interventions in AF can reduce the risk of stroke by approximately 68%. Population studies show that a large group of patients have intermittent or chronic AF that remains unrecognized. If a simple screening test for this arrhythmia could be developed and validated, application of the technique across populations might identify AF patients for early treatment, potentially reducing the incidence of stroke. In this study, we sought to determine whether individuals taken from the general community could be taught to find and classify the pulse of another as very irregular, implying AF, or regular, implying normal sinus rhythm (NSR). The aim was to establish that pulse examination for potential AF could be performed by individuals with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be effectively used as a screening procedure for this medically important arrhythmia. METHODS: We enrolled 178 subjects selected from the general community from four centers. Subjects received standardized education on the medical importance of AF and its signature, a very irregular pulse. A technique for palpating and characterizing the rhythm of the radial pulse was also taught. Without further coaching, subjects were then asked to find their pulse and then to find and classify the pulse of two models randomly presented who may or may not have had AF. RESULTS: Of the 178 subjects tested, 92% were able to find their own pulse; 17 (9.6%) were unable to find the pulse of one or both patient models and were, therefore, excluded from the study. Of the remaining 161 subjects, 76% (122 of 161) correctly identified the pulse in an AF model, and 86% (139 of 161) correctly identified the pulse in an NSR model. Results did not statistically differ as a function of age, educational status, or location. DISCUSSION: This multicenter trial established that given minimal standardized instructions, subjects from the general community can reliably and consistently find both their pulse as well as the pulse of another and to differentiate a regular pulse from a very irregular pulse. If similar educational programs were widely applied across large populations, periodic screening for AF might lead to earlier diagnosis and appropriate treatment for patients who have this major risk factor for stroke. These screening programs should be focused on the population over the age of 55 where the risk of stroke in AF increases with each decade.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate disability in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) by using combinations of functional assessment scales and subscales to predict (1) the burden of care measured in minutes of assistance provided per day by another person in the home, and (2) the subject's level of satisfaction with life in general. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Incapacity Status Scale, Environmental Status Scale, and the Barthel Index had high intercorrelations with each other. Although each was predictive of the MS subject's physical care needs, the FIM was the most useful. A change in total FIM score of one point was equivalent to an average of 3.38 minutes of help from another person per day. With the Brief Symptom Inventory and the Environmental Status Scale, the FIM contributed to predicting the patient's general satisfaction as well. We propose that burden of care and subjective satisfaction with life be the standards by which functional assessment instruments are compared to reflect, in pragmatic terms, the impact of disability on the lives of individuals and on the human and economic resources of the community.
