Mapping the Road to Recovery: Shorter Stays and Satisfied Patients in Posterior Spinal Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) experience variations in their hospital care, which may lead to differences in objective and patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that using plan of care-educating families preoperatively and standardizing some aspects of care-would decrease time to mobility and time to discharge while maintaining pain control and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Chart review was conducted in 3 groups-preprotocol (December 2008 to December 2009, n=51), first protocol (December 2, 2009 to July 24, 2013, n=100), and second protocol (July 25, 2013 to June 1, 2014, n=39)-to track pain scores (0 to 10), time to regular diet, Foley catheter removal, epidural catheter removal, mobility, and discharge. Patient satisfaction surveys (0 to 10) were administered before discharge. Statistical analysis was performed using a 1-way analysis of variance test with Tukey post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Average pain scores were similar in all groups. Time to sitting was significantly reduced in both first protocol (27.2±9.8 h, P=1×10) and second protocol (28.4±13.6 h, P=3×10) compared with preprotocol (40.2±15.4 h). Time to discharge was significantly lower in second protocol (84.3±27.2 h, P=0.036) compared with first protocol (98.4±27.8 h). Patient satisfaction with care was significantly higher in first protocol (9.1/10, P=2×10) and second protocol (8.6/10, P=5×10) compared with preprotocol (6.5/10). CONCLUSIONS: By educating families preoperatively and standardizing portions of postoperative care in PSF for AIS, pain scores were significantly reduced while overall satisfaction remained high. Specifically, by removing the epidural and Foley catheters on postoperative day 2, time to discharge was dramatically decreased by 15 hours. The application of a multidisciplinary, evidence-driven plan of care for AIS patients undergoing PSF improves throughput and has beneficial effects on objective and patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective case series.

Outcomes following removal of instrumentation after posterior spinal fusion.

BACKGROUND: Although there is good evidence to support the removal of instrumentation for infection following posterior spine fusion, there are few studies that report outcomes following removal for late operative site pain. The purpose of this study was 3-fold: (1) to determine whether removal of instrumentation following posterior spinal fusion resolves preoperative pain, (2) to determine whether indolent infection not detected before removal of instrumentation is related to late operative site pain, and (3) to determine whether curve progression differs when spinal hardware is removed for infection versus late operative site pain. METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive patients aged 10 to 21 years, who underwent removal of instrumentation after posterior spinal fusion over a 10-year-period was conducted. Patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative imaging results, laboratory studies, and operative findings were reviewed. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-sample t test, bivariate analysis, and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included. Indications for removal of spinal instrumentation were pain (57%), infection (28%), hardware failure (8%), and prominent hardware (7%). The mean time from index procedure to hardware removal was 2.8 years. The average loss of curve correction following complete hardware removal was 23.1 degrees. Patients who underwent removal of hardware because of infection had bigger changes in their curves than those without infection (mean, 33.8 degrees vs. 18.8 degrees). Of the 43 patients with pain, only 40% reported relief of their symptoms following removal of hardware. Sixteen of the 43 patients were found to have indolent infection confirmed by positive intraoperative culture results. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be cautioned that hardware removal after posterior spinal fusion may not provide complete pain relief. Furthermore, there is risk for curve progression following removal of instrumentation, particularly in the setting of infection. Back pain may be an indicator of infection, and intraoperative cultures should be taken at the time of implant removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; retrospective case series.

Obesity and its effects on pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the effects of childhood obesity on fracture complexity and associated injuries in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. METHODS: A billing query identified all patients who were two to eleven years of age and had undergone operative treatment for extension-type supracondylar humeral fractures over a 12.5-year period. Records were reviewed for demographic data, body mass index percentile, and injury data. Complex fractures were defined as type-3 supracondylar humeral fractures, supracondylar humeral fractures with intercondylar extension, or supracondylar humeral fractures with ipsilateral upper-extremity fractures. Logistic regression analyses were used to test relationships among body mass index subgroups, fracture complexity, elbow motion, preoperative and postoperative neurovascular status, and complications. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-four patients met our inclusion criteria. Forty-one children were underweight (BMI in the <5th percentile), 182 were normal weight (BMI in the 5th to 85th percentile), sixty-three were overweight (BMI in the >85th to 95th percentile), and sixty-eight were obese (BMI in the >95th percentile). There were 149 patients, eleven of whom were obese, with isolated type-2 fractures and 205 patients, fifty-seven of whom were obese, with complex fractures. Thirty-two patients had preoperative nerve palsies and twenty-eight patients had postoperative nerve palsies. Using logistic regression, obesity was associated with complex fractures (odds ratio, 9.19 [95% confidence interval, 4.25 to 19.92]; p < 0.001), preoperative nerve palsies (odds ratio, 2.69 [95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 6.29]; p = 0.02), postoperative nerve palsies (odds ratio, 7.69 [95% confidence interval, 2.66 to 22.31]; p < 0.001), and postoperative complications (odds ratio, 4.03 [95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 9.46]; p < 0.001). Additionally, obese patients were more likely to sustain complex fractures from a fall on an outstretched hand than normal-weight patients (odds ratio, 13.00 [95% confidence interval, 3.44 to 49.19]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with more complex supracondylar humeral fractures, preoperative and postoperative nerve palsies, and postoperative complications. To our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the implications of obesity on supracondylar humeral fracture complexity and associated injuries and it validates public health efforts in combating childhood obesity.

Postoperative spine and VEPTR infections in children: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) after pediatric scoliosis surgery is a major cause of morbidity. We compared the odds ratios of various potential risk factors for infection among patients who developed a deep SSI following spinal deformity surgery and those who remained infection free. METHODS: This was a case-control study, not a matched study. More noninfection cases (50) than infection cases (20) were selected because more were available. Twenty children with a deep SSI after scoliosis surgery were compared with 50 similar children who did not develop a deep SSI. Fourteen perioperative factors were examined in both the groups. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients who had a deep SSI, 14 had neuromuscular scoliosis. In the infected group, 6 patients had undergone vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib placement, 2 had undergone growing rod insertion, and 12 had undergone posterior spinal fusion. Eighteen patients developed a SSI within 1 year of the operation and 2 patients presented with a SSI >1 year after surgery. Sixteen patients had positive cultures. Majority were skin flora: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (8) and Propionibacterium acnes (4). Both patients with tracheostomies had Enterococcus faecalis infections. When comparing the 20 patients with deep SSI to the 50 controls, increased preoperative Cobb angle (P=0.011), increased postoperative Cobb angle (P=0.0043), nonambulatory status (P=0.0002), and increased length of stay (P=0.015) were associated with significantly increased odds of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that patients with neuromuscular scoliosis are at higher risk of developing a deep SSI after spinal deformity surgery. Skin flora is a common cause of deep SSI. We have now instituted a standard skin preparation protocol to include alcohol and chlorhexidine washes the night before and the morning of surgery. We have altered our prophylactic antibiotic regimen to cover skin flora in all patients and gastrointestinal flora in patients with a tracheostomy. We have counseled the families of nonambulatory children with large neuromuscular curves regarding the significantly increased odds of postoperative deep SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.