Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Food Saf (Tokyo) ; 6(1): 44-50, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32231946

ABSTRACT

In this study, a collection of Salmonella enterica subspecies obtained from live mice caught on 32 poultry farms in the Northeast US between 1995 to 1998 was evaluated to provide a historical reference for serotype distribution during a time when egg contamination by serotype Enteritidis was at its peak. Of 821 mice cultured, 157 were positive (19.1%). Seven mice harbored two serotypes of Salmonella. Nine serotypes were detected, eight of which are often associated with foodborne illness. The three most prevalent serotypes were Enteritidis, Heidelberg, and Typhimurium. Enteritidis and Typhimurium were obtained from both spleens and intestines without preference according to type of sample. In contrast, Heidelberg was isolated most often from intestines and Schwarzengrund was most often obtained from spleens. These results support that the house mouse Mus musculus was a risk factor for introduction of multiple pathogenic Salmonella serotypes in poultry raised in the Northeast US during the mid-1990s. Isolates were submitted to the Food and Drug Administration and draft genomes for 64 isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis data have been released through the National Center for Biotechnology Information via the GenomeTrakr network.

2.
Avian Dis ; 53(3): 455-7, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19848088

ABSTRACT

Growing concerns about avian influenza, and its effect on agriculture and human health, have highlighted the need to understand the role of wildlife in maintaining and spreading the virus. We surveyed the wildlife inhabiting a poultry farm with recent H3N6 and H4N6 avian influenza virus exposure in Pennsylvania, U.S.A. One raccoon (Procyon lotor) tested positive for H4N6 antibodies. This is the first recorded incident of avian influenza exposure in a wild raccoon. We suggest that raccoons may play a role in the transmission of avian influenza viruses and in compromising biosecurity efforts at poultry operations.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Influenza A virus/classification , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Raccoons , Animals , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/blood , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology , Serologic Tests
3.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 70(5): 2756-63, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15128529

ABSTRACT

Characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis was refined by incorporating new data from isolates obtained from avian sources, from the spleens of naturally infected mice, and from the United Kingdom into an existing lipopolysaccharide (LPS) O-chain compositional database. From least to greatest, the probability of avian isolates producing high-molecular-mass LPS O chain ranked as follows: pooled kidney, liver, and spleen; intestine; cecum; ovary and oviduct; albumen; yolk; and whole egg. Mouse isolates were most like avian intestinal samples, whereas United Kingdom isolates were most like those from the avian reproductive tract and egg. Non-reproductive tract organ isolates had significant loss of O chain. Isogenic isolates that varied in ability to make biofilm and to be orally invasive produced different O-chain structures at 25 degrees C but not at 37 degrees C. Hens infected at a 91:9 biofilm-positive/-negative colony phenotype ratio yielded only the negative phenotype from eggs. These results indicate that the environment within the hen applies stringent selection pressure on subpopulations of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis at certain points in the infection pathway that ends in egg contamination. The avian cecum, rather than the intestines, is the early interface between the environment and the host that supports emergence of subpopulation diversity. These results suggest that diet and other factors that alter cecal physiology should be investigated as a means to reduce egg contamination.


Subject(s)
Eggs/microbiology , Food Contamination , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella enteritidis/classification , Animals , Cecum/microbiology , Chickens/microbiology , Female , Lipopolysaccharides/metabolism , Mice , Organ Specificity , Salmonella enteritidis/growth & development
4.
Avian Dis ; 48(1): 26-33, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15077795

ABSTRACT

An avian influenza (AI) outbreak occurred in meat-type chickens in central Pennsylvania from December 2001 to January 2002. Two broiler breeder flocks were initially infected almost simultaneously in early December. Avian influenza virus (AIV), H7N2 subtype, was isolated from the two premises in our laboratory. The H7N2 isolates were characterized as a low pathogenic strain at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories based on molecular sequencing of the virus hemagglutinin cleavage site and virus challenge studies in specific-pathogen-free leghorn chickens. However, clinical observations and pathologic findings indicated that this H7N2 virus appeared to be significantly pathogenic in meat-type chickens under field conditions. Follow-up investigation indicated that this H7N2 virus spread rapidly within each flock. Within 7 days of the recognized start of the outbreak, over 90% seroconversion was observed in the birds by the hemagglutination inhibition test. A diagnosis of AI was made within 24 hr of bird submission during this outbreak using a combination of virus detection by a same-day dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and virus isolation in embryonating chicken eggs. Follow-up investigation revealed that heavy virus shedding (90%-100% of birds shedding AIV) occurred between 4 and 7 days after disease onset, and a few birds (15%) continued to shed virus at 13 days post-disease onset, as detected by virus isolation on tracheal and cloacal swabs. AIV was not detected in or on eggs laid by the breeders during the testing phase of the outbreak. The two flocks were depopulated at 14 days after disease onset, and AIV was not detected on the two premises 23 days after depopulation.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Influenza A virus/classification , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/diagnosis , Influenza in Birds/virology , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Poultry , Poultry Diseases/diagnosis , Poultry Diseases/virology , Quarantine/veterinary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...