DeepSelectNet: deep neural network based selective sequencing for oxford nanopore sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Nanopore sequencing allows selective sequencing, the ability to programmatically reject unwanted reads in a sample. Selective sequencing has many present and future applications in genomics research and the classification of species from a pool of species is an example. Existing methods for selective sequencing for species classification are still immature and the accuracy highly varies depending on the datasets. For the five datasets we tested, the accuracy of existing methods varied in the range of [Formula: see text] 77 to 97% (average accuracy < 89%). Here we present DeepSelectNet, an accurate deep-learning-based method that can directly classify nanopore current signals belonging to a particular species. DeepSelectNet utilizes novel data preprocessing techniques and improved neural network architecture for regularization. RESULTS: For the five datasets tested, DeepSelectNet's accuracy varied between [Formula: see text] 91 and 99% (average accuracy [Formula: see text] 95%). At its best performance, DeepSelectNet achieved a nearly 12% accuracy increase compared to its deep learning-based predecessor SquiggleNet. Furthermore, precision and recall evaluated for DeepSelectNet on average were always > 89% (average [Formula: see text] 95%). In terms of execution performance, DeepSelectNet outperformed SquiggleNet by [Formula: see text] 13% on average. Thus, DeepSelectNet is a practically viable method to improve the effectiveness of selective sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to base alignment and deep learning predecessors, DeepSelectNet can significantly improve the accuracy to enable real-time species classification using selective sequencing. The source code of DeepSelectNet is available at https://github.com/AnjanaSenanayake/DeepSelectNet .

miRNAFinder: A comprehensive web resource for plant Pre-microRNA classification.

microRNAs (miRNAs) are known as one of the small non-coding RNA molecules that control the expression of genes at the RNA level, while some operate at the DNA level. They typically range from 20 to 24 nucleotides in length and can be found in the plant and animal kingdoms as well as in some viruses. Computational approaches have overcome the limitations of the experimental methods and have performed well in identifying miRNAs. Compared to mature miRNAs, precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) are long and have a hairpin loop structure with structural features. Therefore, most in-silico tools are implemented for pre-miRNA identification. This study presents a multilayer perceptron (MLP) based classifier implemented using 180 features under sequential, structural, and thermodynamic feature categories for plant pre-miRNA identification. This classifier has a 92% accuracy, a 94% specificity, and a 90% sensitivity. We have further tested this model with other small non-coding RNA types and obtained 78% accuracy. Furthermore, we introduce a novel dataset to train and test machine learning models, addressing the overlapping data issue in the positive training and testing datasets presented in PlantMiRNAPred for the classification of real and pseudo-plant pre-miRNAs. The new dataset and the classifier that can be used with any plant species are deployed on a web server freely accessible at http://mirnafinder.shyaman.me/.

ENVirT: inference of ecological characteristics of viruses from metagenomic data.

BACKGROUND: Estimating the parameters that describe the ecology of viruses,particularly those that are novel, can be made possible using metagenomic approaches. However, the best-performing existing methods require databases to first estimate an average genome length of a viral community before being able to estimate other parameters, such as viral richness. Although this approach has been widely used, it can adversely skew results since the majority of viruses are yet to be catalogued in databases. RESULTS: In this paper, we present ENVirT, a method for estimating the richness of novel viral mixtures, and for the first time we also show that it is possible to simultaneously estimate the average genome length without a priori information. This is shown to be a significant improvement over database-dependent methods, since we can now robustly analyze samples that may include novel viral types under-represented in current databases. We demonstrate that the viral richness estimates produced by ENVirT are several orders of magnitude higher in accuracy than the estimates produced by existing methods named PHACCS and CatchAll when benchmarked against simulated data. We repeated the analysis of 20 metavirome samples using ENVirT, which produced results in close agreement with complementary in virto analyses. CONCLUSIONS: These insights were previously not captured by existing computational methods. As such, ENVirT is shown to be an essential tool for enhancing our understanding of novel viral populations.

Assessing Species Diversity Using Metavirome Data: Methods and Challenges.

Assessing biodiversity is an important step in the study of microbial ecology associated with a given environment. Multiple indices have been used to quantify species diversity, which is a key biodiversity measure. Measuring species diversity of viruses in different environments remains a challenge relative to measuring the diversity of other microbial communities. Metagenomics has played an important role in elucidating viral diversity by conducting metavirome studies; however, metavirome data are of high complexity requiring robust data preprocessing and analysis methods. In this review, existing bioinformatics methods for measuring species diversity using metavirome data are categorised broadly as either sequence similarity-dependent methods or sequence similarity-independent methods. The former includes a comparison of DNA fragments or assemblies generated in the experiment against reference databases for quantifying species diversity, whereas estimates from the latter are independent of the knowledge of existing sequence data. Current methods and tools are discussed in detail, including their applications and limitations. Drawbacks of the state-of-the-art method are demonstrated through results from a simulation. In addition, alternative approaches are proposed to overcome the challenges in estimating species diversity measures using metavirome data.

CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.

BACKGROUND: In metagenomics, the separation of nucleotide sequences belonging to an individual or closely matched populations is termed binning. Binning helps the evaluation of underlying microbial population structure as well as the recovery of individual genomes from a sample of uncultivable microbial organisms. Both supervised and unsupervised learning methods have been employed in binning; however, characterizing a metagenomic sample containing multiple strains remains a significant challenge. In this study, we designed and implemented a new workflow, Coverage and composition based binning of Metagenomes (CoMet), for binning contigs in a single metagenomic sample. CoMet utilizes coverage values and the compositional features of metagenomic contigs. The binning strategy in CoMet includes the initial grouping of contigs in guanine-cytosine (GC) content-coverage space and refinement of bins in tetranucleotide frequencies space in a purely unsupervised manner. With CoMet, the clustering algorithm DBSCAN is employed for binning contigs. The performances of CoMet were compared against four existing approaches for binning a single metagenomic sample, including MaxBin, Metawatt, MyCC (default) and MyCC (coverage) using multiple datasets including a sample comprised of multiple strains. RESULTS: Binning methods based on both compositional features and coverages of contigs had higher performances than the method which is based only on compositional features of contigs. CoMet yielded higher or comparable precision in comparison to the existing binning methods on benchmark datasets of varying complexities. MyCC (coverage) had the highest ranking score in F1-score. However, the performances of CoMet were higher than MyCC (coverage) on the dataset containing multiple strains. Furthermore, CoMet recovered contigs of more species and was 18 - 39% higher in precision than the compared existing methods in discriminating species from the sample of multiple strains. CoMet resulted in higher precision than MyCC (default) and MyCC (coverage) on a real metagenome. CONCLUSIONS: The approach proposed with CoMet for binning contigs, improves the precision of binning while characterizing more species in a single metagenomic sample and in a sample containing multiple strains. The F1-scores obtained from different binning strategies vary with different datasets; however, CoMet yields the highest F1-score with a sample comprised of multiple strains.