ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Over recent years, a growing number of studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of alternative models to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) such as tele-PR or home-based unsupervised PR, offering perspectives for improved accessibility and adherence. Other studies have demonstrated the relevance and long-term benefits of maintenance PR programs. However, they remain poorly implemented in real-life settings. In order to encourage patient adherence to new PR models and to guide future orientations, we conducted a survey assessing patients' views on PR models and maintenance programs. METHOD: The survey (37 questions) was circulated to COPD patients of the French national respiratory patient F.F.A.A.I.R network and in five specialised PR centres. RESULTS: Among the 298 respondents, 75% had previously taken part in a PR program, mainly in hospital settings (91%), with a high degree of satisfaction. The main barriers to PR were being physically separated from their loved ones (21%) and fears of having to share a double room (47%). Regarding maintenance PR programs, patients expressed diversified opinions, in terms of ideal duration and frequency of follow-up, format of follow-up (home-based, telephone, videoconference) and type of professional involved. CONCLUSIONS: Diversified PR settings offer perspectives to increase access and improve the effectiveness of current programs. Furthermore, comprehensive personalization (professionals involved, content, setting, duration) seems to be the key to success in concrete implementation and achievement of patient satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , France/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/psychology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/psychology , Aged, 80 and over , ForecastingABSTRACT
Abnormal hematopoiesis, including a deficiency of marrow progenitors and particularly of erythroid progenitors, has been described after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), persisting for several years. In order to explain this deficiency, a resistance of marrow progenitors to stem cell factor (SCF) after ASCT was investigated. Marrow samples were harvested from pregraft patients at graft collection prior to ASCT, transplanted patients 6-24 months after high-dose therapy and control patients. CD34+ cells were cultured in a serum-free clonogenic assay with increasing doses of SCF. The clonogenic efficiency without SCF was lower for BFU-E in treated groups than in controls, whereas it was not different for CFU-GM. With increasing doses of SCF a dose-dependent effect was found on the numbers of both CFU-GM and BFU-E in all groups, although the maximal number of BFU-E remained lower in treated groups. However, the SCF dose that induced 50% of maximal BFU-E growth (D50) was similar in all groups. Furthermore, a dose-dependent effect on the size of BFU-E was found in all groups, with no difference in the proportion of large colonies. Thus, clonogenic erythroid progenitors from patients who have received myelotoxic treatments remain sensitive to SCF, with no evidence for a chemotherapy-related resistance.
