Generation of a new Adar1p150 -/- mouse demonstrates isoform-specific roles in embryonic development and adult homeostasis.

The RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) is an essential regulator of the innate immune response to both cellular and viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing by ADAR1 modifies the sequence and structure of endogenous dsRNA and masks it from the cytoplasmic dsRNA sensor melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), preventing innate immune activation. Loss-of-function mutations in ADAR are associated with rare autoinflammatory disorders including Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS), defined by a constitutive systemic up-regulation of type I interferon (IFN). The murine Adar gene encodes two protein isoforms with distinct functions: ADAR1p110 is constitutively expressed and localizes to the nucleus, whereas ADAR1p150 is primarily cytoplasmic and is inducible by IFN. Recent studies have demonstrated the critical requirement for ADAR1p150 to suppress innate immune activation by self dsRNAs. However, detailed in vivo characterization of the role of ADAR1p150 during development and in adult mice is lacking. We identified a new ADAR1p150-specific knockout mouse mutant based on a single nucleotide deletion that resulted in the loss of the ADAR1p150 protein without affecting ADAR1p110 expression. The Adar1p150 -/- died embryonically at E11.5-E12.5 accompanied by cell death in the fetal liver and an activated IFN response. Somatic loss of ADAR1p150 in adults was lethal and caused rapid hematopoietic failure, demonstrating an ongoing requirement for ADAR1p150 in vivo. The generation and characterization of this mouse model demonstrates the essential role of ADAR1p150 in vivo and provides a new tool for dissecting the functional differences between ADAR1 isoforms and their physiological contributions.

The phenotype of the most common human ADAR1p150 Zα mutation P193A in mice is partially penetrant.

ADAR1 -mediated A-to-I RNA editing is a self-/non-self-discrimination mechanism for cellular double-stranded RNAs. ADAR mutations are one cause of Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome, an inherited paediatric encephalopathy, classed as a "Type I interferonopathy." The most common ADAR1 mutation is a proline 193 alanine (p.P193A) mutation, mapping to the ADAR1p150 isoform-specific Zα domain. Here, we report the development of an independent murine P195A knock-in mouse, homologous to human P193A. The Adar1P195A/P195A mice are largely normal and the mutation is well tolerated. When the P195A mutation is compounded with an Adar1 null allele (Adar1P195A/- ), approximately half the animals are runted with a shortened lifespan while the remaining Adar1P195A/- animals are normal, contrasting with previous reports. The phenotype of the Adar1P195A/- animals is both associated with the parental genotype and partly non-genetic/environmental. Complementation with an editing-deficient ADAR1 (Adar1P195A/E861A ), or the loss of MDA5, rescues phenotypes in the Adar1P195A/- mice.

What do editors do? Understanding the physiological functions of A-to-I RNA editing by adenosine deaminase acting on RNAs.

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing is a post-transcriptional modification of RNA which changes its sequence, coding potential and secondary structure. Catalysed by the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) proteins, ADAR1 and ADAR2, A-to-I editing occurs at approximately 50 000-150 000 sites in mice and into the millions of sites in humans. The vast majority of A-to-I editing occurs in repetitive elements, accounting for the discrepancy in total numbers of sites between species. The species-conserved primary role of editing by ADAR1 in mammals is to suppress innate immune activation by unedited cell-derived endogenous RNA. In the absence of editing, inverted paired sequences, such as Alu elements, are thought to form stable double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) structures which trigger activation of dsRNA sensors, such as MDA5. A small subset of editing sites are within coding sequences and are evolutionarily conserved across metazoans. Editing by ADAR2 has been demonstrated to be physiologically important for recoding of neurotransmitter receptors in the brain. Furthermore, changes in RNA editing are associated with various pathological states, from the severe autoimmune disease Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, to various neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions and cancer. However, does detection of an editing site imply functional importance? Genetic studies in humans and genetically modified mouse models together with evolutionary genomics have begun to clarify the roles of A-to-I editing in vivo. Furthermore, recent developments suggest there may be the potential for distinct functions of editing during pathological conditions such as cancer.

The majority of A-to-I RNA editing is not required for mammalian homeostasis.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, mediated by ADAR1 and ADAR2, occurs at tens of thousands to millions of sites across mammalian transcriptomes. A-to-I editing can change the protein coding potential of a transcript and alter RNA splicing, miRNA biology, RNA secondary structure and formation of other RNA species. In vivo, the editing-dependent protein recoding of GRIA2 is the essential function of ADAR2, while ADAR1 editing prevents innate immune sensing of endogenous RNAs by MDA5 in both human and mouse. However, a significant proportion of A-to-I editing sites can be edited by both ADAR1 and ADAR2, particularly within the brain where both are highly expressed. The physiological function(s) of these shared sites, including those evolutionarily conserved, is largely unknown. RESULTS: To generate completely A-to-I editing-deficient mammals, we crossed the viable rescued ADAR1-editing-deficient animals (Adar1E861A/E861AIfih1-/-) with rescued ADAR2-deficient (Adarb1-/-Gria2R/R) animals. Unexpectedly, the global absence of editing was well tolerated. Adar1E861A/E861AIfih1-/-Adarb1-/-Gria2R/R were recovered at Mendelian ratios and age normally. Detailed transcriptome analysis demonstrated that editing was absent in the brains of the compound mutants and that ADAR1 and ADAR2 have similar editing site preferences and patterns. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ADAR1 and ADAR2 are non-redundant and do not compensate for each other's essential functions in vivo. Physiologically essential A-to-I editing comprises a small subset of the editome, and the majority of editing is dispensable for mammalian homeostasis. Moreover, in vivo biologically essential protein recoding mediated by A-to-I editing is an exception in mammals.

Defining the functions of adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing through hematology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The direct modification of RNA is now understood to be widespread, evolutionarily conserved and of consequence to cellular and organismal homeostasis. adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is one of the most common mammalian RNA modifications. Transcriptome-wide maps of the A-to-I editing exist, yet functions for the majority of editing sites remain opaque. Herein we discuss how hematology has been applied to determine physiological and malignant functions of A-to-I editing. RECENT FINDINGS: Functional studies have established that A-to-I editing and ADAR1, responsible for the majority of editing in blood cells, are essential for normal blood cell homeostasis. ADAR1 edits endogenous RNA and reshapes its secondary structure, preventing MDA5 from perceiving the cells own RNA as pathogenic. Roles for ADAR1 in human leukaemia, and most recently, cancer cell intrinsic and extrinsic functions of ADAR1 have been identified that highlight ADAR1 as a therapeutic target in cancer. SUMMARY: The studies reviewed have identified the key physiological function of ADAR1 and mechanistic basis for A-to-I editing in normal physiology and have now been extended to cancer. As our understanding of the biology and consequences of A-to-I editing evolve, it may be possible to target ADAR1 function advantageously in a number of settings.

Protein recoding by ADAR1-mediated RNA editing is not essential for normal development and homeostasis.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing of dsRNA by ADAR proteins is a pervasive epitranscriptome feature. Tens of thousands of A-to-I editing events are defined in the mouse, yet the functional impact of most is unknown. Editing causing protein recoding is the essential function of ADAR2, but an essential role for recoding by ADAR1 has not been demonstrated. ADAR1 has been proposed to have editing-dependent and editing-independent functions. The relative contribution of these in vivo has not been clearly defined. A critical function of ADAR1 is editing of endogenous RNA to prevent activation of the dsRNA sensor MDA5 (Ifih1). Outside of this, how ADAR1 editing contributes to normal development and homeostasis is uncertain. RESULTS: We describe the consequences of ADAR1 editing deficiency on murine homeostasis. Adar1 E861A/E861A Ifih1 -/- mice are strikingly normal, including their lifespan. There is a mild, non-pathogenic innate immune activation signature in the Adar1 E861A/E861A Ifih1 -/- mice. Assessing A-to-I editing across adult tissues demonstrates that outside of the brain, ADAR1 performs the majority of editing and that ADAR2 cannot compensate in its absence. Direct comparison of the Adar1 -/- and Adar1 E861A/E861A alleles demonstrates a high degree of concordance on both Ifih1 +/+ and Ifih1 -/- backgrounds, suggesting no substantial contribution from ADAR1 editing-independent functions. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses demonstrate that the lifetime absence of ADAR1-editing is well tolerated in the absence of MDA5. We conclude that protein recoding arising from ADAR1-mediated editing is not essential for organismal homeostasis. Additionally, the phenotypes associated with loss of ADAR1 are the result of RNA editing and MDA5-dependent functions.

The role of RNA editing by ADAR1 in prevention of innate immune sensing of self-RNA.

The innate immune system is the first line of the cellular defence against invading pathogens. A critical component of this defence is the capacity to discriminate foreign RNA molecules, which are distinct from most cellular RNAs in structure and/or modifications. However, a series of rare autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases in humans highlight the propensity for the innate immune sensing system to be activated by endogenous cellular double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs), underscoring the fine line between distinguishing self from non-self. The RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 has recently emerged as a key regulator that prevents innate immune pathway activation, principally the cytosolic dsRNA sensor MDA5, from inducing interferon in response to double-stranded RNA structures within endogenous RNAs. Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA editing by ADAR1 is proposed to destabilise duplexes formed from inverted repetitive elements within RNAs, which appear to prevent MDA5 from sensing these RNA as virus-like in the cytoplasm. Aberrant activation of these pathways has catastrophic effects at both a cellular and organismal level, contributing to one of the causes of the conditions collectively known as the type I interferonopathies.

The multifunctional Staufen proteins: conserved roles from neurogenesis to synaptic plasticity.

Staufen (Stau) proteins belong to a family of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that are important for RNA localisation in many organisms. In this review we discuss recent findings on the conserved role played by Stau during both the early differentiation of neurons and in the synaptic plasticity of mature neurons. Recent molecular data suggest mechanisms for how Stau2 regulates mRNA localisation, mRNA stability, translation, and ribonucleoprotein (RNP) assembly. We offer a perspective on how this multifunctional RBP has been adopted to regulate mRNA localisation under several different cellular and developmental conditions.

Interactome of two diverse RNA granules links mRNA localization to translational repression in neurons.

Transport of RNAs to dendrites occurs in neuronal RNA granules, which allows local synthesis of specific proteins at active synapses on demand, thereby contributing to learning and memory. To gain insight into the machinery controlling dendritic mRNA localization and translation, we established a stringent protocol to biochemically purify RNA granules from rat brain. Here, we identified a specific set of interactors for two RNA-binding proteins that are known components of neuronal RNA granules, Barentsz and Staufen2. First, neuronal RNA granules are much more heterogeneous than previously anticipated, sharing only a third of the identified proteins. Second, dendritically localized mRNAs, e.g., Arc and CaMKIIα, associate selectively with distinct RNA granules. Third, our work identifies a series of factors with known roles in RNA localization, translational control, and RNA quality control that are likely to keep localized transcripts in a translationally repressed state, often in distinct types of RNPs.

Staufen2 regulates neuronal target RNAs.

RNA-binding proteins play crucial roles in directing RNA translation to neuronal synapses. Staufen2 (Stau2) has been implicated in both dendritic RNA localization and synaptic plasticity in mammalian neurons. Here, we report the identification of functionally relevant Stau2 target mRNAs in neurons. The majority of Stau2-copurifying mRNAs expressed in the hippocampus are present in neuronal processes, further implicating Stau2 in dendritic mRNA regulation. Stau2 targets are enriched for secondary structures similar to those identified in the 3' UTRs of Drosophila Staufen targets. Next, we show that Stau2 regulates steady-state levels of many neuronal RNAs and that its targets are predominantly downregulated in Stau2-deficient neurons. Detailed analysis confirms that Stau2 stabilizes the expression of one synaptic signaling component, the regulator of G protein signaling 4 (Rgs4) mRNA, via its 3' UTR. This study defines the global impact of Stau2 on mRNAs in neurons, revealing a role in stabilization of the levels of synaptic targets.