ABSTRACT
Objetivos: El muestreo de hisopado nasofaríngeo para la detección de SARS CoV-2 es un método estándar para el diagnóstico de COVID-19, pero su recolección generalmente ocasiona incomodidad en el paciente y expone a un mayor riesgo al personal de salud. La muestra de saliva parece ser una buena alternativa con respecto a las muestras de hisopado nasofaringeo, no es invasiva, reduce el riesgo de contaminación del personal sanitario y permite la auto recolección. Este estudio tiene por objetivo comparar la capacidad de detectar al SARS CoV-2 por RT-PCR en un mismo paciente, a partir de muestras de saliva y de hisopado nasofaríngeo para analizar la concordancia de los resultados obtenidos entre ambas muestras. Métodos: Treinta muestras de saliva y de HNF de pacientes con síntomas de COVID-19 que ingresaron al servicio de emergencia del Hospital Clínico Viedma fueron tomadas en paralelo. Ambas muestras fueron analizadas por RT-PCR para la detección de SARS CoV-2. La concordancia de resultados fue calculada por el coeficiente de kappa de Cohen. Resultados: Nuestros resultados muestran que existe una buena concordancia (Índice Kappa 0,730; IC del 95%: 0,486 - 0,974) entre los dos tipos de muestras analizadas. Conclusiones: La saliva parece ser una muestra fiable y efectiva para la detección del SARS CoV-2.
Objectives: Nasopharyngeal swab sampling for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 is a standard method for the diagnosis of COVID-19, but its collection usually causes discomfort in the patient and exposes healthcare workers to a higher risk. Saliva seems to be a good alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs, as it is non-invasive, reduces the risk of contamination of healthcare workers, and allows self-collection. This study aims to compare the ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in the same patient using saliva and nasopharyngeal swab samples to analyze the concordance of the results obtained between the two samples. Methods: Thirty saliva and nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients with COVID-19 symptoms who were admitted to the emergency department of the Viedma Clinical Hospital were taken in parallel. Both samples were analyzed by RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The concordance of results was calculated using the Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Results: Our results show that there is good concordance (Kappa index 0.730; 95% CI: 0.486-0.974) between the two types of samples analyzed. Conclusions: Saliva seems to be a reliable and effective sample for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effects of exposure to a 50 Hz electric field (EF) on plasma level of triacylglycerol, free fatty acids, total cholesterol and phospholipid and mRNA expression level of diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) 1 and 2 in liver and intestines from C57BL/6 J mice were studied. METHODS: The test was based on comparison between mice post treated with 50 Hz EF of 45 kV/m intensity for 30 min per day for 11 days or without EF. DGATs mRNA expression was analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: There was no difference in the gene expression level of DGAT1 in liver and intestines. The DGAT2 gene expression level in liver derived from mice treated with EF was significantly lower than those in the control (P < 0.001). Both plasma total cholesterol (P < 0.01) and phospholipid (P < 0.05) in the group exposed to EF were lower than those in the control, but there was no difference in triacylglycerol or free fatty acid levels. CONCLUSION: Exposure to 50 Hz EF decrease the plasma levels of total cholesterol and phospholipids, and downregulated DGAT2 mRNA expression in liver. The mechanisms for the effects of EF on lipid metabolism are not well understand yet, but altered DGAT2 activity may be involved.
