Effect of bite tray impression technique on relocation accuracy in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy.

A previously developed method for achieving patient relocation in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (attachment of an infrared fiducial system to a bite tray) relies on the integrity of a bite tray system that incorporates moulding to the patient's upper dentition. Reproducible and accurate patient positioning requires stability of the bite tray and mould during the full treatment process, both during the time the bite tray is inserted in the patient's mouth, and between separate bite tray insertions. The optimum construction method for a stable reproducible tray has not been sufficiently investigated. We undertook a study to identify factors which might influence the integrity of the hard palate bite tray system. Reprosil Fast Set Putty was used to construct 3 impression conditions; teeth only; teeth and alveolar sulcus; and teeth, alveolar sulcus, and the hard palate. Reproducibility was assessed by volunteers inserting the impressions multiple times and recording the locations of 8 standard reference points. Our results showed the optimal impression technique (i.e., the one that led to the smallest ranges in positional and rotational errors) was that which incorporated the teeth, alveolar sulcus, and hard palate.

Feasible measurement errors when undertaking in vivo dosimetry during external beam radiotherapy of the breast.

In vivo dosimetry is a proven reliable method of checking overall treatment accuracy, allowing verification of dosimetry and dose calculation as well as patient treatment setup. We conducted a pilot study to assess the clinical utility of in vivo dosimetry in our department. Diodes (calibrated for typical treatment conditions) were used to record entrance dose measurements on 62 patients representing a variety of treatment sites. Measurements were compared with predictions from the planning system, with results found to be in tolerance for the majority of treatment sites. However, large discrepancies were encountered for measurements performed during breast irradiation (up to 16% for lateral tangential fields). The sensitivity of the recorded entrance dose to the positioning error of the diode placement was examined. The sensitivity of diode signal to small changes in position were compared with feasible variations in other parameters (e.g., dosimetry, FSD at setup). For the breast irradiation technique considered, wedges are used for the majority of fields. It was found that a proportion of error was predominantly due to the use of wedges and the presence of significantly nonuniform patient contours. In combination with diode placement errors, this resulted in increased measurement error. Correct diode placement is critical to ensure accurate data collection. The results of this study indicate the importance of separating errors due to measurement technique from actual treatment/setup errors.