Quetiapine for the Treatment of Pediatric Delirium.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common complication of critical illness, with a prevalence of 25% among pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Pharmacological treatment options for ICU delirium are limited to off-label use of antipsychotics, but their benefit remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate quetiapine effectiveness for the treatment of delirium in critically ill pediatric patients and to describe the safety profile of quetiapine. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of patients aged ≤ 18 years who screened positive for delirium via the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD ≥ 9) and received ≥ 48 hours of quetiapine therapy was conducted. The relationship between quetiapine and deliriogenic medication doses was evaluated. RESULTS: This study included 37 patients who received quetiapine for the treatment of delirium. The change in sedation requirements before quetiapine initiation to 48 hours after the highest quetiapine dose demonstrated a downward trend; 68% of patients had a decrease in opioid requirements and 43% of patients had a decrease in benzodiazepine requirements. The median CAPD score at baseline was 17 and the median CAPD score at 48 hours after the highest dose was 16. Three patients experienced QTc prolongation (defined as a QTc ≥ 500), although none developed dysrhythmias. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Quetiapine did not have a statistically significant impact on deliriogenic medication doses. There were minimal changes in QTc and dysrhythmias were not identified. Therefore, quetiapine can be safe to use in our pediatric patients but further studies are needed to find an effective dose.

Increasing Rates of Prone Positioning in Acute Care Patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning improves mortality in patients intubated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and has been proposed as a treatment for nonintubated patients with COVID-19 outside the ICU. However, there are substantial patient and operational barriers to prone positioning on acute floors. The objective of this project was to increase the frequency of prone positioning among acute care patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of all adult patients admitted to the acute care floors with COVID-19 respiratory failure. A run chart was used to quantify the frequency of prone positioning over time. For the subset of patients assisted by a dedicated physical therapy team, oxygen before and after positioning was compared. The initiative consisted of four separate interventions: (1) nursing, physical therapy, physician, and patient education; (2) optimization of supply management and operations; (3) an acute care prone positioning team; and (4) electronic health record optimization. RESULTS: From March 9, 2020, to August 26, 2020, 176/875 (20.1%) patients were placed in prone position. Among these, 43 (24.4%) were placed in the prone position by the physical therapy team. Only 2/94 (2.1%) eligible patients admitted in the first two weeks of the pandemic were ever documented in prone position. After launching the initiative, weekly frequency peaked at 13/28 (46.4%). Mean oxygen saturation was 91% prior to prone positioning vs. 95.2% after (p < 0.001) in those positioned by physical therapy. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative increased frequency of prone positioning by proactively addressing barriers in knowledge, equipment, training, and information technology.

Early Neurorehabilitation and Recovery from Disorders of Consciousness After Severe COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Early neurorehabilitation improves outcomes in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) after brain injury, but its applicability in COVID-19 is unknown. We describe our experience implementing an early neurorehabilitation protocol for patients with COVID-19-associated DoC in the intensive care unit (ICU) and evaluate factors associated with recovery. METHODS: During the initial COVID-19 surge in New York City between March 10 and May 20, 2020, faced with a disproportionately high number of ICU patients with prolonged unresponsiveness, we developed and implemented an early neurorehabilitation protocol, applying standard practices from brain injury rehabilitation care to the ICU setting. Twenty-one patients with delayed recovery of consciousness after severe COVID-19 participated in a pilot early neurorehabilitation program that included serial Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) assessments, multimodal treatment, and access to clinicians specializing in brain injury medicine. We retrospectively compared clinical features of patients who did and did not recover to the minimally conscious state (MCS) or better, defined as a CRS-R total score (TS) ≥ 8, before discharge. We additionally examined factors associated with best CRS-R TS, last CRS-R TS, hospital length of stay, and time on mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Patients underwent CRS-R assessments a median of six (interquartile range [IQR] 3-10) times before discharge, beginning a median of 48 days (IQR 40-55) from admission. Twelve (57%) patients recovered to MCS after a median of 8 days (IQR 2-14) off continuous sedation; they had lower body mass index (p = 0.009), lower peak serum C-reactive protein levels (p = 0.023), higher minimum arterial partial pressure of oxygen (p = 0.028), and earlier fentanyl discontinuation (p = 0.018). CRS-R scores fluctuated over time, and the best CRS-R TS was significantly higher than the last CRS-R TS (median 8 [IQR 5-23] vs. 5 [IQR 3-18], p = 0.002). Earlier fentanyl (p = 0.001) and neuromuscular blockade (p = 0.015) discontinuation correlated with a higher last CRS-R TS. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of our cohort of patients with prolonged unresponsiveness following severe COVID-19 recovered to MCS or better before hospital discharge, achieving a clinical benchmark known to have relatively favorable long-term prognostic implications in DoC of other etiologies. Hypoxia, systemic inflammation, sedation, and neuromuscular blockade may impact diagnostic assessment and prognosis, and fluctuations in level of consciousness make serial assessments essential. Early neurorehabilitation of these patients in the ICU can be accomplished but is associated with unique challenges. Further research should evaluate factors associated with longer-term neurologic recovery and benefits of early rehabilitation in patients with severe COVID-19.

Early Mobilization in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Mobilizing patients during an intensive care unit admission results in improved clinical and functional outcomes. The goal of this quality improvement project was to increase the percentage of patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mobilized early from 62% to 80%. Early mobilization was within 18 hours of admission for nonmechanically ventilated (non-MV) patients and 48 hours for mechanically ventilated (MV) patients. METHODS: We collected data from September 15, 2015, to December 15, 2016, identified key drivers and barriers, and developed interventions. Interventions included the development of an algorithm to identify patients appropriate for mobilization, management of barriers to mobilization, and education on the benefits of early mobilization. The percentage of PICU patients mobilized early; the percentage of patients with physical therapy, occupational therapy (OT), speech-language pathology (SLP), and activity orders; identified barriers; PICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition, were compared between the pre- and postintervention groups and the non-MV and MV subgroups. The MV subgroup was too small for statistical testing. RESULTS: All measures in the combined postintervention group improved and reached significance (<0.05), except for the percentage of SLP orders and discharged home. Percentage mobilized early increased 25%, activity orders 50%, physical therapist orders 14%, OT orders 11%, SLP orders 7%, and discharged home 6%. Hospital LOS decreased by 35%, and PICU LOS decreased by 34%. All measures in the postintervention, non-MV subgroup improved and reached significance (<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This early mobilization program was associated with statistically significant improvements in the rate of early mobilization, activity and therapy orders, and hospital and PICU LOS.

Early Rehabilitation in the Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Units for Patients With and Without Mechanical Ventilation: An Interprofessional Performance Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Most early mobility studies focus on patients on mechanical ventilation and the role of physical and occupational therapy. This Performance Improvement Project (PIP) project examined early mobility and increased intensity of therapy services on patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with and without mechanical ventilation. In addition, speech-language pathology rehabilitation was added to the early mobilization program. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy of early mobilization of patients with and without mechanical ventilation in the ICU on length of stay (LOS) and patient outcomes and to determine the financial viability of the program. DESIGN: PIP. Prospective data collection in 2014 (PIP) compared with a historical patient population in 2012 (pre-PIP). SETTING: Medical and surgical ICUs of a Level 2 trauma hospital. PATIENTS: There were 160 patients in the PIP and 123 in the pre-PIP. INTERVENTIONS: Interprofessional training to improve collaboration and increase intensity of rehabilitation therapy services in the medical and surgical intensive care units for medically appropriate patients. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics; intensity of service; ICU and hospital LOS; medications; pain; discharge disposition; functional mobility; and average cost per day were examined. MAIN RESULTS: Rehabilitation therapy services increased from 2012 to 2014 by approximately 60 minutes per patient. The average ICU LOS decreased by almost 20% from 4.6 days (pre-PIP) to 3.7 days (PIP) (P = .05). A decrease of over 40% was observed in the floor bed average LOS from 6.0 days (pre-PIP) to 3.4 days (PIP) (P < .01). An increased percentage of PIP patients, 40.5%, were discharged home without services compared with 18.2% in the pre-PIP phase (P < .01). Average cost per day in the ICU and floor bed decreased in the PIP group, resulting in an annualized net cost savings of $1.5 million. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the PIP indicate that enhanced rehabilitation services in the ICU is clinically feasible, results in improved patient outcomes, and is fiscally sound. Most early mobility studies focus on patients on mechanical ventilation. The results of this PIP project demonstrate that there are significant benefits to early mobility and increased intensity of therapy services on ICU patients with and without mechanical ventilation. Benefits include reduced hospitalization LOS, decreased health care costs, and decreased need for postacute care services. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.