Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aust Occup Ther J ; 69(4): 391-402, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35289425

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Student Practice Evaluation Form - Revised Edition (SPEF-R) was used across Australian universities from 2008 to 2020 to assess occupational therapy student performance on practice placement. Evolution of practice contexts, placement models and professional competency standards prompted updating of the tool. This paper describes the second and final action research cycle in the development of the SPEF-R2. METHODS: Cycle 2 included three phases: (a) piloting of the SPEF-R2 and post-pilot survey to determine utility and applicability; (b) post-pilot focus groups/interviews; and (c) final amendments for publication and launch. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and reported using illustrative quotes. RESULTS: In Phase 1, 23 participants piloted the SPEF-R2 and completed a post-pilot survey. Results indicated participants found the SPEF-R2 relevant to a range of traditional and contemporary settings, easy to understand and an improvement over the previous version of the tool. Most participants found it more concise and less repetitive than the SPEF-R. Participants particularly valued additions regarding culturally responsive practice, student health and well-being and reflective practice. In Phase 2, five post-pilot focus groups/interviews were held, gathering a deeper understanding of its utility. Discussion highlighted desire for an additional core item within the self-management domain (Domain Two). Increased confidence in rating and provision of feedback on student performance were also evident. Reflection on findings led to final amendments and publication of the SPEF-R2. CONCLUSION: Extensive consultation with the occupational therapy community informed the development of the SPEF-R2, reflecting contemporary practice and meeting the expectations of Australian occupational therapists. Action research was an effective approach to the development of the SPEF-R2. Use of the manual and training website and support from universities are paramount if practice educators are to use the tool effectively.


Subject(s)
Occupational Therapy , Australia , Clinical Competence , Health Services Research , Humans , Occupational Therapy/education , Students
2.
Aust Occup Ther J ; 68(1): 21-31, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33029795

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Student Practice Evaluation Form-Revised Edition (SPEF-R) is used by all Australian universities to assess the capability and performance of occupational therapy students on block practice placements. The occupational therapy landscape in Australia has evolved significantly since the SPEF-R was developed. This study aimed to review the SPEF-R and develop a revised edition, the SPEF-R2. METHODS: The first cycle of an action research process involved four phases: (a) mapping the SPEF-R to the Australian Occupational Therapy Competency Standards 2018 (AOTCS); (b) development of the SPEF-R2; (c) national consultation through an online survey with clinicians, university staff and students; and (d) reflection and further amendments. RESULTS: In phase 1, good alignment was found between the AOTCS 2018 and the SPEF-R. In phase 2, the SPEF-R2 was developed to further enhance alignment, including expanded content related to culturally responsive practice, reflective practice and clinical/professional reasoning, resulting in two items being added to the tool. Further wording adjustments were made to improve clarity, reduce duplication and improve relevance to the contemporary occupational therapy landscape. In phase 3, survey results indicated that the SPEF-R2 was well received overall, with most participants viewing it as an improvement on the SPEF-R. Cultural content and reflective practice additions in particular received positive feedback. Concerns were raised by some participants, including perceived repetition, the length of the tool and time required for completion, and addressed by further amendments in phase 4. Three items were removed or consolidated elsewhere, and three items became core items. CONCLUSION: The Australian occupational therapy community considers the SPEF-R2 to be a timely and much-needed development. Piloting of the SPEF-R2 and final revisions prior to release are planned for subsequent action cycles and amendments will be made to the online platform and associated training resources.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Educational Measurement/methods , Occupational Therapy/education , Australia , Clinical Reasoning , Cultural Competency , Documentation , Evidence-Based Practice , Health Services Research , Humans , Mental Health , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...