Epidemiology of fungal infection in COVID 19 in Spain during 2020 and 2021: a nationwide study.

We realize a nationwide population-based retrospective study to analyze the characteristics and risk factors of fungal co-infections in COVID-19 hospitalized patients as well as describe their causative agents in the Spanish population in 2020 and 2021. Data were obtained from records in the Minimum Basic Data Set of the National Surveillance System for Hospital Data in Spain, provided by the Ministry of Health, and annually published with two years lag. The assessment of the risk associated with the development of healthcare-associated fungal co-infections was assessed using an adjusted logistic regression model. The incidence of fungal co-infection in COVID-19 hospitalized patients was 1.41%. The main risk factors associated were surgery, sepsis, age, male gender, obesity, and COPD. Co-infection was associated with worse outcomes including higher in-hospital and in ICU mortality, and higher length of stay. Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. were the microorganisms more frequent. This is the first study analyzing fungal coinfection at a national level in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Spanish population and one of the few studies available that demonstrate that surgery was an independent risk factor of Aspergillosis coinfection in COVID-19 patients.

Situación de los cuidados intensivos en España / Intensive care in Spain

No disponible

Endothelial dysfunction is an early indicator of sepsis and neutrophil degranulation of septic shock in surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Stratification of the severity of infection is currently based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, which is difficult to calculate outside the ICU. Biomarkers could help to stratify the severity of infection in surgical patients. METHODS: Levels of ten biomarkers indicating endothelial dysfunction, 22 indicating emergency granulopoiesis, and six denoting neutrophil degranulation were compared in three groups of patients in the first 12 h after diagnosis at three Spanish hospitals. RESULTS: There were 100 patients with infection, 95 with sepsis and 57 with septic shock. Seven biomarkers indicating endothelial dysfunction (mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-ProADM), syndecan 1, thrombomodulin, angiopoietin 2, endothelial cell-specific molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and E-selectin) had stronger associations with sepsis than infection alone. MR-ProADM had the highest odds ratio (OR) in multivariable analysis (OR 11·53, 95 per cent c.i. 4·15 to 32·08; P = 0·006) and the best area under the curve (AUC) for detecting sepsis (0·86, 95 per cent c.i. 0·80 to 0·91; P < 0·001). In a comparison of sepsis with septic shock, two biomarkers of neutrophil degranulation, proteinase 3 (OR 8·09, 1·34 to 48·91; P = 0·028) and lipocalin 2 (OR 6·62, 2·47 to 17·77; P = 0·002), had the strongest association with septic shock, but lipocalin 2 exhibited the highest AUC (0·81, 0·73 to 0·90; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: MR-ProADM and lipocalin 2 could be alternatives to the SOFA score in the detection of sepsis and septic shock respectively in surgical patients with infection.

ANTECEDENTES: La estratificación de la gravedad de una infección se basa actualmente en la puntuación SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), que es difícil de calcular fuera de la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Los biomarcadores podrían ayudar a estratificar la gravedad de la infección en pacientes quirúrgicos. MÉTODOS: Se compararon las concentraciones de 10 biomarcadores que denotan disfunción endotelial, 22 que indican granulopoyesis de emergencia y 6 que expresan la degranulación de neutrófilos en tres grupos de pacientes de tres hospitales españoles (100 con infección, 95 con sepsis y 57 con shock séptico) en las primeras doce horas después del diagnóstico. RESULTADOS: Siete biomarcadores que expresan disfunción endotelial (proadrenomedulina, sindecan-1, trombomodulina, angiopoyetina-2, endocan-1, molécula de adhesión endotelial 1 y E-selectina) mostraron una fuerte asociación con la sepsis en comparación con la infección aislada. La proadrenomedulina presentó el valor más alto de la razón de oportunidades (odds ratio, OR) en el análisis multivariable (OR 11,53, i.c. del 95% 4,15-32,08, P = 0,006) y la mejor área bajo la curva para detectar sepsis (AUC 0,86, i.c. del 95% 0,80-0,91, P < 0,001). En la comparación entre sepsis y shock séptico, los biomarcadores que mostraron la asociación más estrecha con el shock séptico fueron dos biomarcadores de degranulación de neutrófilos (proteinasa-3 y lipocalina-2) (OR 8,09, i.c. del 9% 1,34-48,91, P = 0,028; OR 6.62, i.c. del 95% 2,47-17,77, P = 0,002), pero la lipocalina-2 presentó la mejor AUC (0,81, i.c. del 95% 0,73-0,90, P < 0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: la proadrenomedulina y la lipocalina-2 podrían representar alternativas a la puntuación SOFA para detectar sepsis y shock séptico en pacientes quirúrgicos con infección.

Impact of empirical treatment with antifungal agents on survival of patients with candidemia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of echinocandins and fluconazole) on mortality 7 and 30 days after candidemia onset and overall in-hospital mortality), in patients with candidemia at a Spanish tertiary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that enrolled all non-neutropenic adult patients diagnosed with candidemia at Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid between 2007 and 2016. A total of 179 patients were evaluated, they were divided into two sub-groups: surviving patients (n = 92) and non-surviving patients (n = 87). RESULTS: The 7-day mortality was 25,1% (45), 30-day mortality was 46,9% (84), and overall in-hospital mortality was 48,6% (87). 40.8% of patients received no antifungal treatment (43.8% of surviving patients and 37.8% of non-surviving patients; p=0.15). A total of 106 (59.2%) patients were treated, of which 90 patients (50.3%) received empiric treatment. 19.6% and 47.8% of surviving patients were treated with echinocandins and fluconazole, respectively. By contrast, of non-surviving patients, 31.0% were treated with echinocandins and 47.1% received fluconazole. Survival for the first 7 days was significantly higher in treated with antifungal agents (log-rank = 0.029), however, there were not significant differences in 30-day survival. Factors linked to a significant increase in overall in-hospital mortality were age (OR 1.040), septic shock (OR 2.694) and need for mechanical ventilation > 48 h (OR 2.812). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received antifungal treatment, regardless of whether they received fluconazole or echinocandins, had a significantly lower mortality rate after 7 days than untreated patients, although no significant differences in 30-day mortality were seen.

Antifungal treatment with echinocandins: a 10-year clinical experience.

OBJECTIVE: The number of studies evaluating the use of echinocandins, whether or not its indication meets international guidelines, in clinical practice is limited. The objective of the present study was to determine the use of echinocandins in a tertiary Spanish hospital in 10 years of clinical practice, and to evaluate its impact on prognosis. METHODS: This retrospective study involved adult nonneutropenic ill patients with suspicion of fungal invasion who started treatment with echinocandins between 2006 and 2015. RESULTS: The number of patients treated with echinocandins was 153, and candidemia was detected thereafter in 25.5%. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients receiving echinocandins were: sex male, septic shock, Charlson comorbidity index, and total stay at the hospital. In-hospital mortality after 7, 30 and 90 days was 13.7%, 24.8%, and 56.8%, respectively. From patients receiving echinocandins, 98 did no show multifocal colonization, 50 had Candida score <2.5, and 49 did not meet Ostrosky-Zeichner prediction rule. A total of 19 patients did not show any of these 3 potential risk factors for candidemia. CONCLUSIONS: The use of echinocandins in 10 years of clinical practice in our tertiary hospital has been performed according to international guidelines; however, candidemia was only diagnosed thereafter in only 25.5% of cases. Furthermore, according to our results, the adequate use of echinocandins seems not to be associated with reduced mortality rates. Further studies, involving a large cohort of patients and more hospitals, are required to corroborate these results.