Effects of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Immediate Tissue Expander and Acellular Dermal Matrix Reconstruction: Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) delivered to an immediate reconstruction increases the risk of surgical complications. Although acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been used with immediate tissue expander (TE) reconstruction to improve cosmetic outcomes and minimize capsular contracture, there is a paucity of data on this approach in the setting of PMRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-two patients with stage I to III breast cancer were treated with mastectomy, immediate TE-ADM reconstruction, and PMRT between 2009 and 2012 in a prospective single-arm study. The primary objective was the "success" rate, determined by the number of patients at 2 years after PMRT having an intact final reconstruction, no major complications, and a cosmetic outcome rated by a physician as excellent or good. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24 months. Final reconstruction status was known in 31 of 32 patients (96.9%; 1 patient left the country) and completed in 29 of 31 patients (93.5%; implant, n = 26; flap, n = 1; both, n = 2; none, n = 2). At 2 years, 6 patients were unevaluable (metastatic disease, n = 3; withdrawn consent, n = 1; left the country, n = 2). Of 26 evaluable patients, the success rate was 65.4% (17 of 26). Lack of success was the result of "fair" cosmesis (n = 2), infection (n = 2), severe capsular contracture (n = 1), major revision (n = 2), and no final reconstruction (n = 2). Most patients had good-to-excellent 2-year overall cosmesis based on patient perception (15; 62.5%) and physician evaluation (19; 79.2%). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first dedicated prospective trial evaluating long-term cosmetic and complication outcomes in patients treated with immediate TE-ADM reconstruction followed by PMRT. Most patients (65.4%) met the success criteria in this prospective single-arm series. The great majority (93.5%) achieved final reconstruction; most had good-to-excellent overall cosmetic outcomes (79.2%). The results with longer follow-up will be of interest, and further investigation of strategies to optimize reconstruction with PMRT are warranted.

Predictors of Complications and Comparison of Outcomes Using SurgiMend Fetal Bovine and AlloDerm Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrices in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix is one of the most common procedures performed by plastic surgeons. Although numerous matrices are available, there is little literature comparing them. This study compares the rates of complications between two commonly used products: AlloDerm (human cadaveric) and SurgiMend (fetal bovine) acellular dermal matrices. METHODS: A retrospective review of a single center's 6-year experience was performed for consecutive, immediate breast reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix from 2009 to 2014. The authors compared demographics and surgical characteristics between patients receiving AlloDerm versus SurgiMend. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine any association between type of matrix and surgical complications and to identify other clinical predictors for complications. RESULTS: A total of 640 patients underwent 952 reconstructions using AlloDerm [578 breasts (61 percent)] or SurgiMend [374 breasts (39 percent)]. The average follow-up was 587 days. Multivariate analysis revealed that type of matrix was not an independent risk factor for the development of complications. However, smoking, age, radiotherapy, and initial tissue expander fill volume were associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both AlloDerm and SurgiMend acellular dermal matrices demonstrate similar rates of major complications when used in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. In contrast, preoperative radiation therapy, smoking, increasing age, and initial tissue expander fill volume are independent risk factors for postoperative complications. Reconstructive surgeons should take these findings into consideration when performing implant-based breast reconstruction with a dermal matrix.

Evolving options for breast reconstruction.

In summary, if the abdomen cannot be used for a donor site, alternative flap selection is based on individual patient anatomy and body habitus, targeting the buttocks and upper thigh. Intraoperative repositioning may be required for ease in flap harvest and donor site closure, adding time to the procedure. Flap dissection is performed in the subfascial plane to avoid injury to the perforator vessels. Deep suspension sutures may be required to maintain the gluteal fold location.

Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix has become a common adjunct in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. The authors' aim was to determine whether acellular dermal matrix use in immediate prosthesis-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher rate of complications. METHODS: Over a 5½-year period at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, 470 postmastectomy defects were reconstructed immediately using tissue expanders or implants. These were divided into two groups: reconstructions with or without acellular dermal matrix. Data were collected on patient comorbidities, radiation, intraoperative tumescent solution use, prosthesis size, initial fill volume, and complications. RESULTS: The risk for major infections that required prosthesis removal was elevated in the acellular dermal matrix group (4.9 versus 2.5 percent), but this increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.172). There was a statistically significant increase in overall wound infection rate in the acellular dermal matrix group (6.8 versus 2.5 percent, p = 0.031), but in a multivariate analysis, the use of acellular dermal matrix did not materialize as a significant risk factor for overall wound infection. Overall surgical complication rate was significantly higher in the acellular dermal matrix group at 19.5 percent, compared with the non-acellular dermal matrix group at 12.3 percent (p < 0.001). Other significant risk factors for overall surgical complication included smoking, higher body mass index, higher initial volume, and larger implant size. CONCLUSIONS: Patient selection for prosthesis reconstruction involving acellular dermal matrix should be judicious, especially among smokers and patients with elevated body mass index. Even though the use of acellular dermal matrix allows higher initial volumes and reduced number of expansions, one should be careful about putting in too high of an initial volume.

Incidence of major corrective surgery after post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy.

To evaluate the likelihood of requiring major corrective surgery (MCS) after modified radical mastectomy (MRM), immediate reconstruction and radiation therapy (RT) to the reconstructed breast. The study population consisted of 62 patients who underwent MRM and immediate breast reconstruction between 1990 and 1999, had postoperative radiation and at least one follow-up visit or procedure > or = 2 months after radiation. Reconstruction consisted of a pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in 42 patients, latissimus dorsi flap in five, latissimus dorsi plus implant in six, and implant alone in nine. Median follow-up time after reconstruction was 13 months (range: 2-58) for non-implant patients and 10 months (range: 4-57) for implant patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major complications requiring MCS. Ten patients (16%) underwent MCS between 1 and 28 months after radiation (median in these patients of 8 months). 4/47 non-implant patients (9%) underwent MCS, compared to 6/15 implant patients (40%). Of patients followed > or = 6 months after RT, 0/38 non-implant patients underwent MCS within 6 months compared to 3/13 (23%) implant patients (p = 0.01); of patients followed for > or = 12 months after RT, the rates of MCS within 12 months were 1/24 (4%) and 2/7 (29%), respectively (p = 0.12). Patients who undergo immediate reconstruction after mastectomy using an implant followed by radiation have a high rate of subsequent MCS. The difference in the rate of MCS between the implant and non-implant groups is significant in early follow-up. Patients considering an implant followed by RT should be apprised of this increased risk. Prospective studies of these risks and the cosmetic outcomes are warranted.

New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing?

OBJECTIVE: Review of available literature on the topic of breast reconstruction and radiation is presented. Factors influencing the decision-making process in breast reconstruction are analyzed. New trends of immediate breast reconstruction are presented. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: New indications for postmastectomy radiation have caused a dramatic increase in the number of radiated patients presenting for breast reconstruction. The major studies and their impact on breast cancer management practice are analyzed. Unsatisfactory results of conventional immediate reconstruction techniques followed by radiotherapy led to a new treatment algorithm for these patients. If the need for postoperative radiation therapy is known, a delayed reconstruction should be considered. When an immediate reconstruction is still desired despite the certainty of postoperative radiotherapy, reconstructive options should be based on tissue characteristics and blood supply. Autologous tissue reconstruction options should be given a priority in an order reflecting superiority of vascularity and resistance to radiation: latissimus dorsi flap, free TRAM or pedicled TRAM without any contralateral components of tissue, pedicled TRAM/midabdominal TRAM, and perforator flap. CONCLUSIONS: When the indications for postoperative radiotherapy are unknown, premastectomy sentinel node biopsy, delayed-immediate reconstruction, or delayed reconstruction is preferable.

A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of postmastectomy reconstruction and investigate the impact of socioeconomic status on the receipt of reconstruction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Outcomes Project is a prospective, multi-institutional database that contains data on all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients treated at one of the participating comprehensive cancer centers. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 2174 patients with DCIS and stage I, II, and III invasive breast cancer who underwent mastectomy at one of 8 NCCN centers. Rates of reconstruction were determined. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate whether socioeconomic characteristics are associated with breast reconstruction. RESULTS: Overall, 42% of patients had breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Patients with Medicaid and Medicare were less likely to undergo reconstruction than those with managed care insurance; however, there was no difference for indemnity versus managed care insurance. Homemakers and retired patients had fewer reconstructions than those employed outside the home. Patients with a high school education or less were less likely to have reconstruction than those with more education. Race and ethnicity were not significant predictors of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The reconstruction rate in this study (42%) is markedly higher than those previously reported. The type of insurance, education level, and employment status of a patient, but not her race or ethnicity, appear to influence the use of breast reconstruction. Because all patients were treated at an NCCN institution, these socioeconomic differences cannot be explained by access to care.

CD44-hyaluronic acid interactions mediate shear-resistant binding of lymphocytes to dermal endothelium in acute cutaneous GVHD.

For circulating lymphocytes to migrate to inflammatory sites, they must first adhere to the target tissue endothelium with sufficient strength to overcome the shear forces of blood flow. We previously reported that dermal papillary vessels in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) support shear-resistant lymphocyte adherence. We now identify the relevant adhesion molecule(s) directing this binding, showing that interactions between lymphocyte CD44 and hyaluronic acid (HA) expressed on dermal vessels in aGVHD alone confer this shear-resistant attachment. Native HA deposits on vascular endothelium support lymphocyte adherence, whereas HA immobilized on plastic does not. HA expressed at dermal endothelium in aGVHD is thus specialized to support lymphocyte adherence under flow conditions, and CD44-HA interactions may contribute to lymphocytotropism to skin in aGVHD.