Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 34(3): 337-342, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29921339

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Colposcopes are expensive, heavy, and need specialized technical service, which may outreach the capacity of low-resource settings. Our aim was to assess the performance of smartphone-based digital images for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). METHODS: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women recruited through a cervical cancer screening campaign had VIA/VILI assessment (visual inspection after application of acetic acid/lugol's iodine). Cervical digital images were captured with a smartphone camera, randomly coded with no prior selection and distributed on an online database (Google Forms) for evaluation. Healthcare providers were invited to evaluate the images and identify CIN2+. The gold standard was the histopathological diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CIN2+ was assessed for each reader and reported with the 95 percent confidence interval (Clopper-Pearson method). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five consecutive HPV-positive women were included, with 19 CIN2+ (15.2 percent). Forty-five gynecologists completed the assessment, one-third were considered as experts (>50 colposcopies) and two-thirds as novices (<50 colposcopies). The sensitivity and specificity for CIN 2+ detection was 71.3 percent (67.0-75.7 percent) and 62.4 percent (57.5-67.4 percent), respectively. The performance of novices and experts was similar. The readers assessed 73.1 percent of images as acceptable for diagnostic. CONCLUSION: Smartphone-based digital images, with its high portability, have a great potential for the diagnosis of CIN2+ in low-resource context.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Smartphone , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Humans , Madagascar , Neoplasm Grading , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/complications , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/complications , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 46, 2018 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29402226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antenatal care (ANC) has the potential to identify and manage obstetric complications, educate women about risks during pregnancy and promote skilled birth attendance during childbirth. The aim of this study was to assess women's knowledge of obstetric danger signs and factors associated with this knowledge in Ambanja, Madagascar. It also sought to evaluate whether the participation in a mobile health (mHealth) project that aimed to provide comprehensive ANC to pregnant women in remote areas influenced women's knowledge of obstetric danger signs. METHODS: From April to October 2015, a non-random, convenience sample of 372 women in their first year postpartum were recruited, including 161 who had participated in the mHealth project. Data were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Knowledge of at least one danger sign varied from 80.9% of women knowing danger sign(s) in pregnancy, to 51.9%, 50.8% and 53.2% at delivery, postpartum and in the newborn, respectively. Participation in the mHealth intervention, higher household income, and receipt of information about danger signs during pregnancy were associated with knowledge of danger signs during delivery, in bivariate analysis; only higher household income and mHealth project participation were independently associated. Higher educational attainment and receipt of information about danger signs in antenatal care were associated with significantly higher odds of knowing danger sign(s) for the newborn in both bivariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of obstetric danger signs is low. Information provision during pregnancy and with mHealth is promising. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was retrospectively registered at the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Register (identifier ISRCTN15798183 ; August 22, 2015).


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mothers/psychology , Obstetric Labor Complications/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Income , Logistic Models , Madagascar , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telemedicine/methods , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...