Mass spectroscopic phosphoprotein mapping of Ral binding protein 1 (RalBP1/Rip1/RLIP76).

RalBP1, a multifunctional protein implicated in cancer cell proliferation, radiation and chemoresistance, and ligand dependent receptor internalization, is upregulated in bladder cancer and is a downstream effector of RalB, a GTPase associated with metastasis. RalBP1 can be regulated by phosphorylation by protein kinase C (PKC). No studies have comprehensively mapped RalBP1 phosphorylation sites or whether RalB affects these. We identified 14 phosphorylation sites of RalBP1 in human bladder carcinoma UMUC-3 and embryonic kidney derived 293T cells. The phosphorylated residues are concentrated at the N-terminus. Ten of the first 100 amino acids of the primary structure were phosphorylated. Nine were serine residues, and one a threonine. We evaluated the effect of RalB overexpression on RalBP1 phosphorylation and found the largest change in phosphorylation status at S463 and S645. Further characterization of these sites will provide novel insights on RalBP1 biology, its functional relationship to RalB and possible avenues for therapeutic intervention.

RalA and RalB: antagonistic relatives in cancer cell migration.

The Ral family of small G proteins has been implicated in tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastasis. However, little emphasis has been placed on clarifying the individual roles of the two Ral proteins, RalA and RalB, in these processes in view of their high sequence homology. Here we analyze the separate contributions of RalA and RalB in regulating cell migration, a necessary component of the invasive phenotype, in two human cancer cell lines; UMUC-3, a bladder carcinoma line, and the prostate carcinoma line, DU145. Although inhibiting RalA protein expression by approximately 80% with two different small interfering RNA duplexes had no effect on migration, inhibiting RalB expression to the same extent with two different duplexes resulted in a marked reduction in migration. Inhibiting RalB expression did trigger a significant loss of actin cytoskeleton fibers in UMUC-3 that was not seen with inhibition of RalA expression. Interestingly, simultaneous inhibition of RalA and RalB expression had no effect on migration. However, dual inhibition of RalA and RalB expression in UMUC-3 did result in an almost total loss of actin fibers as well as a reduction in proliferation, particularly in reduced serum conditions. These results suggest that RalA and RalB have different roles in cell migration and that they may in fact act as antagonists with regard to this phenotype. As further verification of this hypothesis, we found that expression of constitutively active RalA inhibited migration, whereas expression of constitutively active RalB stimulated migration, consistent with this model. In summary, we present the first demonstration that despite their significant sequence homology, RalA and RalB have nonoverlapping and opposing functions in cancer cell migration but overlapping functions in cell growth.