Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 411
Filter
1.
Resusc Plus ; 17: 100594, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469565

ABSTRACT

Aim: To compare the incidence and percentage of survival after cardiac arrest outside and inside hospital where cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) had been started between two regions in Sweden in a 10-year perspective. Methods: A retrospective observational study including CPR treated patients both after out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA and IHCA) in Sweden, 2013-2022. Data was retrieved from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (SRCR). Results: The overall incidence of OHCA and IHCA events were 2,940 in Dalarna (having a lower population and population density) and 16,187 in Västra Götaland (having a higher population and population density). The overall incidence of survival when OHCA and IHCA were combined was 20 per 100,000 person years in Dalarna and 19 per 100,000 person years in Västra Götaland. The corresponding result for OHCA was 9 versus 7 and for IHCA 11 versus 12. The overall percentage of survival was 20% in Dalarna and 19% in Västra Götaland. The corresponding result for OHCA was 13% versus 10% and for IHCA 37% versus 36%. Conclusion: Overall, there was no marked difference neither in incidence nor in percentage of survival after cardiac arrest between the two regions. However, regarding cardiac arrest that took place outside hospital both incidence and percentage of survival was higher in Dalarna than in Västra Götaland despite the fact that the former had lower population density.

2.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 30(1): 22, 2022 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There has been in increase in the use of systems for organizing lay responders for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) dispatch using smartphone-based technology. The purpose is to increase survival rates; however, such systems are dependent on people's commitment to becoming a lay responder. Knowledge about the characteristics of such volunteers and their motivational factors is lacking. Therefore, we explored characteristics and quantified the underlying motivational factors for joining a smartphone-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) lay responder system. METHODS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 800 consecutively recruited lay responders in a smartphone-based mobile positioning first-responder system (SMS-lifesavers) were surveyed. Data on characteristics and motivational factors were collected, the latter through a modified version of the validated survey "Volunteer Motivation Inventory" (VMI). The statements in the VMI, ranked on a Likert scale (1-5), corresponded to(a) intrinsic (an inner belief of doing good for others) or (b) extrinsic (earning some kind of reward from the act) motivational factors. RESULTS: A total of 461 participants were included in the final analysis. Among respondents, 59% were women, 48% between 25 and 39 years of age, 37% worked within health care, and 66% had undergone post-secondary school. The most common way (44%) to learn about the lay responder system was from a CPR instructor. A majority (77%) had undergone CPR training at their workplace. In terms of motivation, where higher scores reflect greater importance to the participant, intrinsic factors scored highest, represented by the category values (mean 3.97) followed by extrinsic categories reciprocity (mean 3.88) and self-esteem (mean 3.22). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that motivation to join a first responder system mainly depends on intrinsic factors, i.e. an inner belief of doing good, but there are also extrinsic factors, such as earning some kind of reward from the act, to consider. Focusing information campaigns on intrinsic factors may be the most important factor for successful recruitment. When implementing a smartphone-based lay responder system, CPR instructors, as a main information source to potential lay responders, as well as the workplace, are crucial for successful recruitment.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Responders , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/education , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Motivation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy
3.
BMC Emerg Med ; 21(1): 38, 2021 03 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dizziness is a relatively common symptom among patients who call for the emergency medical services (EMS). AIM: To identify factors of importance for the early identification of a time-sensitive condition behind the symptom of dizziness among patients assessed by the EMS. METHODS: All patients assessed by the EMS and triaged using Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment (RETTS) for adults code 11 (=dizziness) in the 660,000 inhabitants in the Municipality of Gothenburg, Sweden, in 2016, were considered for inclusion. The patients were divided into two groups according to the final diagnosis (a time-sensitive condition, yes or no). RESULTS: There were 1536 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 96 (6.2%) had a time-sensitive condition. The majority of these had a stroke/transitory ischaemic attack (TIA). Eight predictors of a time-sensitive condition were identified. Three were associated with a reduced risk: 1) the dizziness was of a rotatory type, 2) the dizziness had a sudden onset and 3) increasing body temperature. Five were associated with an increased risk: 1) sudden onset of headache, 2) a history of head trauma, 3) symptoms of nausea or vomiting, 4) on treatment with anticoagulants and 5) increasing systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Among 1536 patients who were triaged by the EMS for dizziness, 6.2% had a time-sensitive condition. On the arrival of the EMS, eight factors were associated with the risk of having a time-sensitive condition. All these factors were linked to the type of symptoms or to clinical findings on the arrival of the EMS or to the recent clinical history.


Subject(s)
Dizziness , Emergency Medical Services , Ischemic Attack, Transient , Stroke , Time Factors , Adult , Dizziness/diagnosis , Dizziness/epidemiology , Dizziness/etiology , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/diagnosis , Stroke/diagnosis , Sweden , Triage
4.
J Intern Med ; 290(2): 359-372, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33576075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Characteristics and prognosis of patients admitted with strong suspicion of myocardial infarction (MI) but discharged without an MI diagnosis are not well-described. OBJECTIVES: To compare background characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes in patients discharged with or without MI diagnosis. METHODS: The DETermination of the role of Oxygen in suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction (DETO2X-AMI) trial compared 6629 patients with strong suspicion of MI randomized to oxygen or ambient air. The main composite end-point of this subgroup analysis was the incidence of all-cause death, rehospitalization with MI, heart failure (HF) or stroke during a follow-up of 2.1 years (median; range: 1-3.7 years) irrespective of randomized treatment. RESULTS: 1619 (24%) received a non-MI discharge diagnosis, and 5010 patients (76%) were diagnosed with MI. Groups were similar in age, but non-MI patients were more commonly female and had more comorbidities. At thirty days, the incidence of the composite end-point was 2.8% (45 of 1619) in non-MI patients, compared to 5.0% (250 of 5010) in MI patients with lower incidences in all individual end-points. However, for the long-term follow-up, the incidence of the composite end-point increased in the non-MI patients to 17.7% (286 of 1619) as compared to 16.0% (804 of 5010) in MI patients, mainly driven by a higher incidence of all-cause death, stroke and HF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted with a strong suspicion of MI but discharged with another diagnosis had more favourable outcomes in the short-term perspective, but from one year onwards, cardiovascular outcomes and death deteriorated to a worse long-term prognosis.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Patient Readmission , Stroke/epidemiology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Prognosis , Survival Rate
5.
Resuscitation ; 150: 65-71, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32199902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a knowledge gap regarding aetiology of and potential for predicting out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) among individuals who are healthy before the event. AIM: To describe causes of OHCA and the potential for predicting OHCA in apparently healthy patients. METHODS: Patients were recruited from the Swedish Register of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation from November 2007 to January 2011. Inclusion criteria were: OHCA with attempted CPR but neither dispensed prescription medication nor hospital care two years before the event The register includes the majority of patients suffering OHCA in Sweden where cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was attempted. Medication status was defined by linkage to the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Cause of death was assessed based on autopsy and the Swedish Cause of Death Register. Prediction of OHCA was attempted based on available electrocardiograms (ECG) before the OHCA event. RESULTS: Altogether 781 individuals (16% women) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Survival to 30 days was 16%. Autopsy rate was 72%. Based on autopsy, 70% had a cardiovascular aetiology and 59% a cardiac aetiology. An ECG recording before the event was found in 23% of cases. The ECG was abnormal in 22% of them. CONCLUSION: Among OHCA victims who appeared to be healthy prior to the event, the cause was cardiovascular in the great majority according to autopsy findings. A minority had a preceding abnormal ECG that could have been helpful in avoiding the event.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Autopsy , Electrocardiography , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Sweden/epidemiology
6.
Resuscitation ; 136: 78-84, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30572073

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is international variation in the rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). 'Bystander CPR' is defined in the Utstein definitions, however, differences in interpretation may contribute to the variation reported. The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to understand how the term 'bystander CPR' is interpreted in Emergency Medical Service (EMS) across Europe, and to contribute to a better definition of 'bystander' for future reference. METHODS: During analysis of the EuReCa ONE study, uncertainty about the definition of a 'bystander' emerged. Sixty scenarios were developed, addressing the interpretation of 'bystander CPR'. An electronic version of the survey was sent to 27 EuReCa National Coordinators, who distributed it to EMS representatives in their countries. Results were descriptively analysed. RESULTS: 362 questionnaires were received from 23 countries. In scenarios where a layperson arrived on scene by chance and provided CPR, up to 95% of the participants agreed that 'bystander CPR' had been performed. In scenarios that included community response systems, firefighters and/or police personnel, the percentage of agreement that 'bystander CPR' had been performed ranged widely from 16% to 91%. Even in scenarios that explicitly matched examples provided in the Utstein template there was disagreement on the definition. CONCLUSION: In this survey, the interpretation of 'bystander CPR' varied, particularly when community response systems including laypersons, firefighters, and/or police personnel were involved. It is suggested that the definition of 'bystander CPR' should be revised to reflect changes in treatment of OHCA, and that CPR before arrival of EMS is more accurately described.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Terminology as Topic , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Medical Services , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 26(1): 30, 2018 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trauma is a main cause of death among young adults worldwide. Patients experiencing a traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) certainly have a poor prognosis but population-based studies are sparse. Primarily to describe characteristics and 30-day survival following a TCA as compared with a medical out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (medical CA). METHODS: A cohort study based on data from the nationwide, prospective population-based Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (SRCR), a medical cardiac arrest registry, between 1990 and 2016. The definition of a TCA in the SRCR is a patient who is unresponsive with apnoea where cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or defibrillation have been initiated and in whom the Emergency Medical Services (EMS, mainly a nurse-based system) reported trauma as the aetiology. Outcome was overall 30-day survival. Descriptive statistics as well as multivariable logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: In all, between 1990 and 2016, 1774 (2.4%) cases had a TCA and 72,547 had a medical CA. Overall 30-day survival gradually increased over the years, and was 3.7% for TCAs compared to 8.2% following a medical CA (p < 0.01). Among TCAs, factors associated with a higher 30-day survival were bystander witnessed and having a shockable initial rhythm (adjusted OR 2.67, 95% C.I. 1.15-6.22 and OR 8.94 95% C.I. 4.27-18.69, respectively). DISCUSSION: Association in registry-based studies do not imply causality but TCA had short time intervals in the chain of survival as well as high rates of bystander-CPR. CONCLUSION: In a medical CA registry like ours, prevalence of TCAs is low and survival is poor. Registries like ours might not capture the true incidence. However, many individuals do survive and resuscitation in TCAs should not be seen futile.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Electric Countershock , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Registries , Survival Analysis , Sweden/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
J Intern Med ; 283(3): 238-256, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29331055

ABSTRACT

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major health problem that affects approximately four hundred and thousand patients annually in the United States alone. It is a major challenge for the emergency medical system as decreased survival rates are directly proportional to the time delay from collapse to defibrillation. Historically, defibrillation has only been performed by physicians and in-hospital. With the development of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), rapid defibrillation by nonmedical professionals and subsequently by trained or untrained lay bystanders has become possible. Much hope has been put to the concept of Public Access Defibrillation with a massive dissemination of public available AEDs throughout most Western countries. Accordingly, current guidelines recommend that AEDs should be deployed in places with a high likelihood of OHCA. Despite these efforts, AED use is in most settings anecdotal with little effect on overall OHCA survival. The major reasons for low use of public AEDs are that most OHCAs take place outside high incidence sites of cardiac arrest and that most OHCAs take place in residential settings, currently defined as not suitable for Public Access Defibrillation. However, the use of new technology for identification and recruitment of lay bystanders and nearby AEDs to the scene of the cardiac arrest as well as new methods for strategic AED placement redefines and challenges the current concept and definitions of Public Access Defibrillation. Existing evidence of Public Access Defibrillation and knowledge gaps and future directions to improve outcomes for OHCA are discussed. In addition, a new definition of the different levels of Public Access Defibrillation is offered as well as new strategies for increasing AED use in the society.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Defibrillators/supply & distribution , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Population Surveillance , Registries , Humans
9.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 137(5): 523-530, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29315463

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We compare various aspects in the early chain of care among patients with haemorrhagic stroke and ischaemic stroke. MATERIALS & METHODS: The Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and nine emergency hospitals, each with a stroke unit, were included. All patients hospitalised with a first and a final diagnosis of stroke between 15 December 2010 and 15 April 2011 were included. The primary endpoint was the system delay (from call to the EMS until diagnosis). Secondary endpoints were: (i) use of the EMS, (ii) delay from symptom onset until call to the EMS; (iii) priority at the dispatch centre; (iv) priority by the EMS; and (v) suspicion of stroke by the EMS nurse and physician on admission to hospital. RESULTS: Of 1336 patients, 172 (13%) had a haemorrhagic stroke. The delay from call to the EMS until diagnosis was significantly shorter in haemorrhagic stroke. The patient's decision time was significantly shorter in haemorrhagic stroke. The priority level at the dispatch centre did not differ between the two groups, whereas the EMS nurse gave a significantly higher priority to patients with haemorrhage. There was no significant difference between groups with regard to the suspicion of stroke either by the EMS nurse or by the physician on admission to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a haemorrhagic stroke differed from other stroke patients with a more frequent and rapid activation of EMS.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Intracranial Hemorrhages/diagnosis , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/etiology , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Brain Ischemia/complications , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Humans , Intracranial Hemorrhages/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
10.
Resuscitation ; 118: 101-106, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28736324

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There have been few studies of the outcome in elderly patients who have suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and the association between cardiac arrest characteristics and survival. AIM: The aim of this large observational study was to investigate the survival and neurological outcome in the elderly after IHCA, and to identify which factors were associated with survival. METHODS: We investigated elderly IHCA patients (≥70years of age) who were registered in the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry 2007-2015. For descriptive purposes, the patients were grouped according to age (70-79, 80-89, and ≥90years). Predictors of 30-day survival were identified using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Altogether, 11,396 patients were included in the study. Thirty-day survival was 28% for patients aged 70-79 years, 20% for patients aged 80-89 years, and 14% for patients aged ≥90years. Factors associated with higher survival were: patients with an initially shockable rhythm, IHCA at an ECG-monitored location, IHCA was witnessed, IHCA during daytime (8 a.m.-8 p.m.), and an etiology of arrhythmia. A lower survival was associated with a history of heart failure, respiratory insufficiency, renal dysfunction and with an etiology of acute pulmonary oedema. Patients over 90 years of age with VF/VT as initial rhythm had a 41% survival rate. We found a trend indicating a less aggressive care with increasing age during cardiac arrest (fewer intubations, and less use of adrenalin and anti-arrhythmic drugs) but there was no association between age and delay in starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In survivors, there was no significant association between age and a favourable neurological outcome (CPC score: 1-2) (92%, 93%, and 88% in the three age groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age among the elderly is associated with a lower 30-day survival after IHCA. Less aggressive treatment and a worse risk profile might contribute to these findings. Relatively high survival rates among certain subgroups suggest that discussions about advanced directives should be individualized. Most survivors have good neurological outcome, even patients over 90 years of age.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/mortality , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Heart Arrest/mortality , Heart Arrest/therapy , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart Arrest/etiology , Humans , Male , Registries , Statistics, Nonparametric , Sweden , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
11.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 54(2): 235-240, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28583719

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Acute lower limb ischaemia (ALLI) is a potentially fatal, limb threatening medical emergency. Early treatment is essential for a good outcome. The aim was to describe the early chain of care in ALLI focusing on lead times and emergency management in order to identify weak links for improvement. METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive case study. This study analysed the medical records of all patients with a main discharge diagnosis of ALLI between January 2009 and December 2014. Predetermined emergency care data on lead times, diagnosis recognition, presenting symptoms, emergency care treatment and outcome were collected for patients who were transported by the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) and those who were not. RESULTS: In total, 552 medical records were audited of which 195 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Among them were 117 (60%) transported by the EMS. The median time from symptom onset to revascularisation was 23 (interquartile range [IQR] 10-55; EMS transported) and 93 (IQR 42-152, not EMS transported) hours (p < .01). The time from symptom onset to arrival in hospital was 5 (IQR 2-26; EMS transported) and 48 (IQR 6-108; not EMS transported) hours. After arrival in hospital, the median time to first doctor evaluation was 51 (IQR 28-90; EMS transported) and 80 (IQR 44-169; not EMS transported) minutes, p = .01. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was given to 72% of patients in the emergency department (ED) and a multivariate analysis showed that the use of LMWH was associated with a more favourable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Both the time spent in the ED and the time from the onset of symptoms to revascularisation were considerably longer than optimal. Time delays in the early treatment chain can mainly be attributed to "patient delay" and a considerable time spent in hospital before revascularisation. The use of LMWH as an integral part of ED management was associated with a better outcome.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Critical Pathways , Emergency Medical Services , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/therapy , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Administration Schedule , Early Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Ischemia/physiopathology , Limb Salvage , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Time-to-Treatment , Treatment Outcome , Triage , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
12.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 54(1): 21-27, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28526396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: To investigate the frequency of initial misdiagnosis and the clinical consequences of an initial misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data from the Swedish National Registry for Vascular Surgery (Swedvasc) and medical charts were extracted for patients treated for rAAA in the West of Sweden in the period 2008-14. Initially misdiagnosed patients were compared with correctly diagnosed patients. RESULTS: In all, 261 patients were included in the study. Patients with rAAA were initially misdiagnosed in 33% (n = 86) of the cases and this caused a 4.8 hour (median time) additional delay to surgical intervention. There were no differences in 30 day mortality between initially misdiagnosed patients and correctly diagnosed patients (27.9% vs. 28.0%; p = 1.00). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality in initially misdiagnosed patients compared with correctly diagnosed patients was 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.38-1.60). No difference was observed between the groups regarding 90 day mortality, length of intensive care, need for post-operative ventilator support, need of haemodialysis support, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Misdiagnosis is common in patients with rAAA, and treatment is significantly delayed in misdiagnosed patients. The study did not show any survival disadvantage or increased frequency of post-operative complications in misdiagnosed patients despite the delayed treatment. However, only patients who reached surgical intervention were included in the analysis.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Diagnostic Errors , Time-to-Treatment , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/physiopathology , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Aortic Rupture/physiopathology , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sweden , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Am J Emerg Med ; 35(8): 1043-1048, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28238537

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bystanders play a vital role in public access defibrillation (PAD) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Dual dispatch of first responders (FR) alongside emergency medical services (EMS) can reduce time to first defibrillation. The aim of this study was to describe the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in OHCAs before EMS arrival. METHODS: All OHCA cases with a shockable rhythm in which an AED was used prior to the arrival of EMS between 2008 and 2015 in western Sweden were eligible for inclusion. Data from the Swedish Register for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (SRCR) were used for analysis, on-site bystander and FR defibrillation were compared with EMS defibrillation in the final analysis. RESULTS: Of the reported 6675 cases, 24% suffered ventricular fibrillation (VF), 162 patients (15%) of all VF cases were defibrillated before EMS arrival, 46% with a public AED on site. The proportion of cases defibrillated before EMS arrival increased from 5% in 2008 to 20% in 2015 (p<0.001). During this period, 30-day survival increased in patients with VF from 22% to 28% (p=0.04) and was highest when an AED was used on site (68%), with a median delay of 6.5min from collapse to defibrillation. Adjusted odds ratio for on-site defibrillation versus dispatched defibrillation for 30-day survival was 2.45 (95% CI: 1.02-5.95). CONCLUSIONS: The use of AEDs before the arrival of EMS increased over time. This was associated with an increased 30-day survival among patients with VF. Thirty-day survival was highest when an AED was used on site before EMS arrival.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Defibrillators , Emergency Medical Services , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy , Aged , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Defibrillators/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Survival Rate/trends , Sweden/epidemiology , Ventricular Fibrillation/mortality
15.
J Intern Med ; 273(6): 622-7, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23360556

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In a review based on estimations and assumptions, to report the estimated number of survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started and to speculate about possible future improvements in Sweden. DESIGN: An observational study. SETTING: All ambulance organisations in Sweden. SUBJECTS: Patients included in the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Registry who suffered an OHCA between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010. Approximately 80% of OHCA cases in Sweden in which CPR was started are included. INTERVENTIONS: None RESULTS: In 11 005 patients, the 1-month survival rate was 9.4%. There are approximately 5000 OHCA cases annually in which CPR is started and 30-day survival is achieved in up to 500 patients yearly (6 per 100 000 inhabitants). Based on findings on survival in relation to the time to calling for the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) and the start of CPR and defibrillation, it was estimated that, if the delay from collapse to (i) calling EMS, (ii) the start of CPR, and (iii) the time to defibrillation were reduced to <2 min, <2 min, and <8 min, respectively, 300-400 additional lives could be saved. CONCLUSION: Based on findings relating to the delay to calling for the EMS and the start of CPR and defibrillation, we speculate that 300-400 additional OHCA patients yearly (4 per 100 000 inhabitants) could be saved in Sweden.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/trends , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Registries , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Survival Rate/trends , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors
16.
Resuscitation ; 84(7): 952-6, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23313425

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe differences and similarities between reported and non-reported data in the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Register in selected parts in Sweden. METHODS: Prospective and retrospective data for treated OHCA patients in Sweden, 2008-2010, were compared in the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Register. Data were investigated in three Swedish counties, which represented one third of the population. The recording models varied. Prospective data are those reported by the emergency medical service (EMS) crews, while retrospective data are those missed by the EMS crews but discovered afterwards by cross-checking with the local ambulance register. RESULT: In 2008-2010, the number of prospectively (n=2398) and retrospectively (n=800) reported OHCA cases was n=3198, which indicates a 25% missing rate. When comparing the two groups, the mean age was higher in patients who were reported retrospectively (69 years vs. 67 years; p=0.003). There was no difference between groups with regard to gender, time of day and year of OHCA, witnessed status or initial rhythm. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was more frequent among patients who were reported prospectively (65% vs. 60%; p=0.023), whereas survival to one month was higher among patients who were reported retrospectively (9.2% vs. 11.9%; p=0.035). CONCLUSION: Among 3198 cases of OHCA in three counties in Sweden, 800 (25%) were not reported prospectively by the EMS crews but were discovered retrospectively as missing cases. Patients who were reported retrospectively differed from prospectively reported cases by being older, having less frequently received bystander CPR but having a higher survival rate. Our data suggest that reports on OHCA from national quality registers which are based on prospectively recorded data may be influenced by selection bias.


Subject(s)
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Registries/standards , Aged , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Humans , Male , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Sweden/epidemiology
17.
Resuscitation ; 84(2): 213-7, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22922177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge is insufficient of the long-term benefit of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) after out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). AIM: To describe the use and factors of importance for outcome in relation to ICD use among survivors of ventricular fibrillation (VF). METHODS: In consecutive patients discharged alive after OHCA in Gothenburg between 1988 and 2008 the long-term prognosis was followed. RESULTS: In all, there were 5443 OHCAs of which 1489 (27%) were hospitalized alive. Of those, 495 (33%) were discharged alive, of which 390 (79%) had shockable rhythm. The use of ICDs increased, but only 58 of 390 (15%) had an ICD. Among patients who received an ICD, the 2-year mortality was 2%, versus 25% of those who did not (p<0.0001). In follow-up (mean 5.5 years; maximum 10 years), the use of an ICD showed a borderline association with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 024-1.01; p=0.052). Patients who had ICD were younger and had better cerebral function compared with patients without. Predictors for mortality were cerebral function at discharge, age, history of heart failure and myocardial infarction and no coronary angiography during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Among survivors of OHCA caused by VT/VF who had ICD during hospitalization only 2% died during the subsequent 2 years. The use of ICDs was low but increasing. Factors of importance for mortality were cerebral function at the time of discharge, age, history of heart failure and myocardial infarction and no coronary angiography during hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Survivors , Time Factors
18.
Int J Cardiol ; 166(2): 440-7, 2013 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22119114

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe differences in treatment and delay times in acute chest pain at the three hospitals in Göteborg, Sweden. METHODS: All patients admitted to the three hospitals within Sahlgrenska University (SU) (Sahlgrenska: SU/S, Östra: SU/Ö and Mölndal: SU/M) with acute chest pain during 3 months in 2008 were evaluated for diagnosis, early treatment and outcome. RESULTS: In all, 2588 visits by 2393 patients were included (visits n=1253 SU/S; n=853 SU/Ö; n=482 SU/M) of which 50%, 63% and 51% were hospitalised (p<0.0001). Among hospitalised patients, a diagnosis of ACS was reported in 26%, 9% and 22% respectively (p<0.0001). Among ACS patients, 83%, 66% and 57% respectively underwent coronary angiography (p=0.004). The median delay to coronary angiography in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was 42 min at SU/S, 3h 47 min at SU/Ö and 2h 34 min at SU/M (p=0.008). The corresponding values for coronary angiography in unstable coronary artery disease were 42h 7min, 48h 35 min and 123h 42 min (p=0.007). Overall mortality at 30 days was 3.6%, 3.2% and 1.5% (NS) and, at 1 year, it was 9.9%, 9.6% and 7.3% respectively (NS). CONCLUSION: In acute chest pain in the Municipality of Göteborg, there was a marked difference between hospitals in: 1) the percentage of hospitalised patients, 2) the percentage of ACS among hospitalised patients and 3) the delay to and rate of coronary angiography. The clinical consequences of these deviations remain to be proven.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Chest Pain/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Urban Population , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chest Pain/therapy , Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Angiography/trends , Female , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors , Urban Population/trends
19.
Int J Cardiol ; 156(2): 139-43, 2012 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21112645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The gender perspectives of the triage of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in a community are insufficiently explored. METHODS: Patients (n=3224) with symptoms of ACS, in whom ECG was sent by the ambulance crew to a coronary care unit (CCU)/ cath lab, were investigated in the municipality of Göteborg in 2004-2007. Background, triage priority, investigations and treatment were analysed (p-values age adjusted) in relation to gender. Data were compared with three published studies (1995-2002: Surveys 1-3). RESULTS: Women were directly admitted to the CCU significantly less frequently than men (23 versus 35%, p<0.0001). Adjusted for ECG findings, age, symptoms and medical history, odds ratio and 95% confidence limits (for direct admission; men versus women) were 0.61; 0.46-0.82. SURVEY 1: Patients with ACS, aged <80, in CCU at a university hospital (n=1744). Only minor differences between women and men, with regard to investigations and treatment, were found. SURVEY 2: Patients discharged from hospital (dead or alive) with AMI, regardless of type of ward (n=1423). Fewer women than men were admitted to CCU and fewer women underwent coronary angiography (21% versus 40%; p=0.02) and coronary revascularisation (12% versus 27%; p=0.004). SURVEY 3: Patients with symptoms of AMI (n=930) and patients with a confirmed AMI (n=130) from a pre-hospital perspective. Women tended to be given lower priority than men both by the ambulance dispatchers and by the ambulance crew. CONCLUSION: In our practice setting, men are given priority over women in admission to CCU, but no gender differences are seen thereafter.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/standards , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Residence Characteristics , Triage/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Collection/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome , Triage/methods
20.
Resuscitation ; 82(10): 1307-13, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21628082

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe the reported incidence of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and the characteristics and outcome after OHCA in relation to population density in Sweden. METHODS: All patients participating in the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Register between 2008 and 2009 in (a) 20 of 21 regions (n=6457) and in (b) 165 of 292 municipalities (n=3522) in Sweden, took part in the survey. RESULTS: The regional population density varied between 3 and 310 inhabitants per km(2) in 2009. In 2008-2009, the number of reported cardiac arrests varied between 13 and 52 per 100,000 inhabitants and year. Survival to 1 month varied between 2% and 14% during the same period in different regions. With regard to population density, based on municipalities, bystander CPR (p=0.04) as well as cardiac etiology (p=0.002) were more frequent in less populated areas. Ambulance response time was longer in less populated areas (p<0.0001). There was no significant association between population density and survival to 1 month after OHCA or incidence (adjusted for age and gender) of OHCA. CONCLUSION: There was no significant association between population density and survival to 1 month after OHCA or incidence (adjusted for age and gender) of OHCA. However, bystander CPR, cardiac etiology and longer response times were more frequent in less populated areas.


Subject(s)
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Population Density , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Sweden/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...