Long-term survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a group of rare malignant tumours with heterogeneous behaviour. This study aimed to assess long-term survival and prognostic factors associated with survival, in order to optimise counselling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This population-based study included all GEP-NENs diagnosed between 1989 and 2016 in the Netherlands, selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Overall survival (OS) and relative survival (RS) were calculated. A Cox Proportional Hazard analysis was used to identify prognostic factors (gender, age, tumour stage, location and treatment) for OS. Analyses were stratified by metastatic disease status and tumour grade. RESULTS: In total, 9697 patients were included. In grade 1, 2 and 3 non-metastatic GEP-NENs (N = 6544), 5-year OS and RS were 81% and 88%, 78% and 83%, and 26% and 30%, respectively. In grade 1 non-metastatic GEP-NENs 10-year OS and RS were 68% and 83%. In grade 1, 2 and 3 metastatic GEP-NENs (N = 3153), 5-year OS and RS rates were 47% and 52%, 38% and 41%, and 5% and 5%, respectively. The highest (relative) survival rates were found in appendicular and rectal NENs, demonstrating 10-year OS and RS of 87% and 93%, and 81% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These long-term follow-up data demonstrate significant differences in survival for different grades, tumour stage, and primary origin of GEP-NENs, with the most favourable overall and RS rates in patients with non-metastatic grade 1 appendicular and rectal NENs. This study demonstrates unique long-term OS and RS rates using combined stratification by tumour site, grade and stage.

In-depth molecular analysis of combined and co-primary pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Up to 14% of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) are diagnosed in continuity with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. In addition to these combined lesions, 1% to 7% of lung tumors present as co-primary tumors with multiple synchronous lesions. We evaluated molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of combined and co-primary LCNEC-adenocarcinoma (ADC) tumors. Ten patients with LCNEC-ADC (combined) and five patients with multiple synchronous ipsilateral LCNEC and ADC tumors (co-primary) were included. DNA was isolated from distinct tumor parts, and 65 cancer genes were analyzed by next generation sequencing. Immunohistochemistry was performed including neuroendocrine markers, pRb, Ascl1 and Rest. Pure ADC (N = 37) and LCNEC (N = 17) cases were used for reference. At least 1 shared mutation, indicating tumor clonality, was found in LCNEC- and ADC-parts of 10/10 combined tumors but only in 1/5 co-primary tumors. A range of identical mutations was observed in both parts of combined tumors: 8/10 contained ADC-related (EGFR/KRAS/STK11 and/or KEAP1), 4/10 RB1 and 9/10 TP53 mutations. Loss of pRb IHC was observed in 6/10 LCNEC- and 4/10 ADC-parts. The number and intensity of expression of Ascl1 and neuroendocrine markers increased from pure ADC (low) to combined ADC (intermediate) and combined and pure LCNEC (high). The opposite was true for Rest expression. In conclusion, all combined LCNEC-ADC tumors were clonally related indicating a common origin. A relatively high frequency of pRb inactivation was observed in both LCNEC- and ADC-parts, suggesting an underlying role in LCNEC-ADC development. Furthermore, neuroendocrine differentiation might be modulated by Ascl1(+) and Rest(-) expression.

Clinical-Pathologic Challenges in the Classification of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Targets on the Horizon for Future Clinical Practice.

Diagnosing a pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) may be difficult, challenging clinical decision making. In this review, the following key clinical and pathologic issues and informative molecular markers are being discussed: (1) What is the preferred outcome parameter for curatively resected low-grade NENs (carcinoid), for example, overall survival or recurrence-free interval? (2) Does the WHO classification combined with a Ki-67 proliferation index and molecular markers, such as OTP and CD44, offer improved prognostication in low-grade NENs? (3) What is the value of a typical versus atypical carcinoid diagnosis on a biopsy specimen in local and metastatic disease? Diagnosis is difficult in biopsy specimens and recent observations of an increased mitotic rate in metastatic carcinoid from typical to atypical and high-grade NEN can further complicate diagnosis. (4) What is the (ir)relevance of morphologically separating large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) SCLC and the value of molecular markers (RB1 gene and pRb protein or transcription factors NEUROD1, ASCL1, POU2F3, or YAP1 [NAPY]) to predict systemic treatment outcome? (5) Are additional diagnostic criteria required to accurately separate LCNEC from NSCLC in biopsy specimens? Neuroendocrine morphology can be absent owing to limited sample size leading to missed LCNEC diagnoses. Evaluation of genomic studies on LCNEC and marker studies have identified that a combination of napsin A and neuroendocrine markers could be helpful. Hence, to improve clinical practice, we should consider to adjust our NEN classification incorporating prognostic and predictive markers applicable on biopsy specimens to inform a treatment outcome-driven classification.

Preoperative Biopsy Diagnosis in Pulmonary Carcinoids, a Shot in the Dark.

INTRODUCTION: The preferred treatment for pulmonary carcinoids (PCs) is lobectomy, and parenchyma-sparing approaches might be considered for typical carcinoids (TCs). Treatment decisions are based on a preoperative biopsy diagnosis. Following the WHO criteria (2015), definitive diagnosis is only feasible postoperatively, thereby hampering preoperative treatment decisions. Here, we determined whether the final carcinoid classification on a resection specimen can be predicted by a preoperative biopsy. METHODS: We searched all stage I to III patients with a final carcinoid diagnosis who underwent a curative resection and of whom both a preoperative biopsy and paired resection specimen were available (2003-2012) using the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and the Netherlands Cancer Registry (IKNL). Pathology report conclusions of the biopsy-resection specimen were compared. RESULTS: Paired biopsy-resection specimens in combination with clinical data were available from 330 patients. 57% (189 of 330) of the patients exhibited discordance between the preoperative biopsy and paired resection diagnosis, including 36% (44 of 121) preoperatively diagnosed TC, 40% (six of 15) atypical carcinoid (AC), and 65% (103 of 158) not-otherwise-specified (NOS) carcinoids. A quarter of preoperatively diagnosed TC and NOS was reclassified as AC on the resection specimen. Preoperatively diagnosed ACs exhibited the highest relapse rates (40%, 6 of 15). Preoperatively diagnosed TC and NOS patients who were reclassified as ACs exhibited higher relapse rates as compared to nonreclassified TCs and NOS (3% versus 1%, and 16% versus 6%). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that carcinoid classification on preoperative biopsies is imprecise, as is also stated by the current WHO classification. We advise clinicians to interpret the preoperative biopsy diagnosis with caution in deciding the extent of surgery (e.g., parenchyma-sparing versus non-parenchyma-sparing).

Unique Metastatic Patterns in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Different Primary Origin.

INTRODUCTION: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) can originate in different organs, for example, the gastroenteral tract (GE), pancreas (Pan), or lungs (L). Our aim was to examine metastatic patterns for patients with NEN of various primary origins with a special focus on brain metastases to indicate utility for screening. METHODS: All NEN patients except for small cell lung cancer registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry from 2008 to 2018 were selected. Metastatic patterns at initial diagnosis for NEN with different primary origins were compared. In a subcohort of patients from 2 referral hospitals (2014-2019), additional information on, for example, development of metastases after initial presentation was available. RESULTS: In the nationwide cohort, 4,768/11,120 (43%) patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis (GE: 1,504/4,710 [32%]; Pan: 489/1,150 [43%]; and L: 1,230/2,978 [41%]). For GE- and Pan-NEN, the most prevalent metastatic site was the liver (25 and 39%), followed by distant lymph nodes (8 and 8%), whereas only few patients with brain metastases were identified (0% in both). In contrast, for L-NEN, prevalence of metastases in the liver (19%), brain (9%), lung (7%), and bone (14%) was more equal. In the reference network cohort, slightly more NEN patients had metastatic disease (260/539, 48%) and similar metastatic patterns were observed. CONCLUSION: Almost half of NEN patients were diagnosed with synchronous metastatic disease. L-NEN have a unique metastatic pattern compared to GE- and Pan-NEN. Remarkably, an important part of L-NEN metastases was in the brain, whereas brain metastases were almost absent in GE- and Pan-NEN, indicating utility of screening in L-NEN.

Effect of Bisphosphonates, Denosumab, and Radioisotopes on Bone Pain and Quality of Life in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review.

Bone metastases are common in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), often causing pain and a decrease in quality of life (QoL). The effect of bone-targeted agents is evaluated by reduction in skeletal-related events in which neither pain nor QoL are included. Radioisotopes can be administered for more diffuse bone pain that is not eligible for palliative radiotherapy. The evidence that bone-targeted agents relieve pain or improve QoL is not solid. We performed a systematic review of the effect of bone-targeted agents on pain and QoL in patients with NSCLC. Our systematic literature search included original articles or abstracts reporting on bisphosphonates, denosumab, or radioisotopes or combinations thereof in patients with bone metastases (≥5 patients with NSCLC), with pain, QoL, or both serving as the primary or secondary end point. Of the twenty-five eligible studies, 13 examined bisphosphonates (one also examined denosumab) and 12 dealt with radioisotopes. None of the randomized studies on bisphosphonates or denosumab evaluated pain and QoL as the primary end point. In the single-arm studies of bisphosphonates a decrease in pain or analgesic consumption was found for 38% to 77% of patients. QoL was included in five of 13 studies, but improvement was found in only two. No high-level evidence that bisphosphonates or denosumab reduce pain or improve QoL was found. Although the data are limited, radioisotopes seem to reduce pain with a rapid onset of action and duration of response of 1 to 3 months. The evidence that bisphosphonates or denosumab reduce or prevent pain in patients with NSCLC and bone metastases or that they have an influence on QoL is very weak. Radioisotopes can be used to reduce diffuse pain, although there is no high-level evidence supporting such use.

Weekly kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography for detection of dose discrepancies during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Use of highly conformal radiotherapy in patients with head and neck carcinoma may lead to under-/overdosage of gross target volume (GTV) and organs at risk (OAR) due to changes in patients' anatomy. A method to achieve more effective radiation treatment combined with less toxicity is dose-guided radiotherapy (DGRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate discrepancies between planned and actually delivered radiation dose in head and neck patients and to identify predictive factors. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 20 patients with cT2-4 N0-3 M0 carcinoma originating from oropharynx, oral cavity, larynx and hypopharynx (Cohort 1), and seven patients with cT1-4 N0-3 M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (Cohort 2) treated with primary (chemo)radiotherapy and undergoing weekly kV-CBCT scans were included. Radiation dose was recalculated on 184 kV-CBCT images, which was quantified by D95% (GTV), Dmean (parotid and submandibular glands) and D2% (spinal cord). Predictive factors investigated for changes in these dose metrics were: gender, age, cT/N-stage, tumor grade, HPV-status, systemic therapy, body mass index at start of treatment, weight loss and volume change over the duration of the radiotherapy. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the planned and delivered dose for GTV and OARs of Week 1 to subsequent weeks for Cohort 1. In Cohort 2, actually delivered Dmean to parotid glands was significant higher than planned dose (1.1 Gy, p = 0.002). No clinically relevant correlations between dose changes and predictive factors were found. CONCLUSION: Weekly dose calculations do not seem to improve dose delivery for patients with tumors of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. In patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, however, mid-treatment imaging may facilitate DGRT.