COVID-19 Vaccination Before Initiating Rituximab Treatment Induces Strong Serological Response in Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease, Reducing Post-Pandemic Concerns About the Impact of Rituximab.

OBJECTIVE: Rituximab (RTX)-treated patients exhibit suboptimal responses to COVID-19 vaccines. However, existing research primarily involves patients already receiving RTX when vaccines were introduced, failing to account for the current landscape where patients are vaccinated before initiating RTX. Our objective was to compare the serological response to COVID-19 vaccines in patients vaccinated before or after RTX initiation. METHODS: We included 254 RTX-treated patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) and 113 blood donors (BDs) in a retrospective, observational cohort study. Patients were categorized based on the timing of RTX treatment relative to primary COVID-19 vaccination. Serological vaccine responses were assessed using three immunoassays, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of serological response. RESULTS: Patients vaccinated before initiating RTX treatment had significantly higher seroconversion rates of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (87%) and neutralizing antibodies (91%) compared with those receiving RTX before and after vaccination (n = 132) (61% and 65%, respectively). In the logistic regression analysis, a positive serological response was associated with the number of vaccines administered >9 months after the last RTX treatment. Patients receiving the highest number of vaccines with >9 months after RTX showed a response comparable to that of the BDs. CONCLUSION: Vaccinating before RTX initiation yields a robust serological response in patients with AIIRDs. Furthermore, we highlight the reversibility of antibody impairment after RTX treatment cessation, provided that adequate vaccinations occur within a minimum of 9 months after RTX. Our findings offer essential insights for clinical decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccination and RTX treatment, alleviating concerns about future RTX use.

Revaccination of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis without an initial COVID-19 vaccine response elicits seroconversion in half of the patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of COVID-19 mRNA revaccination (two doses) on the antibody response in patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) who were initial vaccine non-responders. Further, to examine if B-cell levels or T-cell responses before revaccination predicted seroconversion. METHODS: From a RD cohort vaccinated with the standard two-dose COVID-19 vaccinations, we enrolled cases without detectable antibody responses (n=17) and controls with detectable antibody response (n=29). Blood donors (n=32) were included as additional controls. Samples were collected before and six weeks after completed revaccination. Total antibodies and specific IgG, IgA, and IgM against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies, and SARS-CoV-2 reacting CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were measured before and after revaccination. B-cells (CD19+CD45+) were quantified before revaccination. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of cases had detectable neutralising antibodies after revaccination. However, antibody levels were significantly lower than in controls and blood donors. Revaccination induced an antibody class switch in cases with a decrease in IgM and increase in IgG. No significant difference was observed in T-cell responses before and after revaccination between the three groups. Only 29% of cases had measurable B-cells compared to 100% of controls and blood donors. Fifty percent of revaccinated cases who seroconverted had measurable B-cells before revaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-seven percent of initial non-responders seroconverted after two-dose revaccination but still had lower levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies compared with controls and blood donors. RD patients without a detectable serological response after the initial COVID-19 mRNA vaccine had a T-cell response similar to immunocompetent controls and blood donors.

Myositis-related autoantibody profile and clinical characteristics stratified by anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A status in connective tissue diseases.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (cN-1A) autoantibodies have been recognized as myositis-related autoantibodies. However, their correlations with clinical characteristics and other myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MSAs/MAAs) are still unclear. We aimed to establish the prevalence and clinical and laboratory associations of cN-1A autoantibodies in a cohort of patients with connective tissue diseases. METHODS: A total of 567 participants (182 idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [IIM], 164 systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], 121 systemic sclerosis [SSc], and 100 blood donors [BD]) were tested for the presence of cN-1A autoantibodies and other myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MSAs/MAAs). Clinical and laboratory characteristics were compared between anti-cN-1A positive and negative patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) and between anti-cN-1A positive and negative patients with non-IBM IIM. RESULTS: In the sIBM cohort, 30 patients (46.9%) were anti-cN-1A positive vs. 18 (15.2%) in the non-IBM IIM cohort, 17 (10%) were anti-cN-1A positive in the SLE cohort and none in the SSc or the BD cohorts. Anti-cN-1A positivity had an overall sensitivity of 46.9% and a specificity of 93.2% for sIBM. Dysphagia was more frequent in the anti-cN-1A positive vs. negative sIBM patients (p = .04). In the non-IBM IIM group, being anti-cN-1A antibody positive was associated with the diagnosis polymyositis (p = .04) and overlap-myositis (p = .04) and less disease damage evaluated by physician global damage score (p < .001). DISCUSSION: cN-1A autoantibodies were predominantly found in IIM patients and was associated with dysphagia in sIBM patients. Notably, anti-cN-1A appears to identify a distinct phenotype of anti-cN-1A positive non-IBM IIM patients with a milder disease course.

COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases leads to a high seroconversion rate and reduced self-imposed isolation and shielding behaviour.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effect of a two-dose messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine on antibody levels against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and patient behaviour and shielding concerning fear of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Three hundred and three patients and 44 blood donors were included. All patients received two doses of an mRNA vaccine and had total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 measured before vaccination and 2 and 9 weeks after the second vaccination. Further, patients answered an electronic questionnaire before and after vaccination concerning behaviour, anxiety, and symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9). RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients (90%) had measurable antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 compared to blood donors (100%) after the second vaccination (P < .001). Treatment with rituximab was the strongest predictor of an unfavourable vaccine response, as only 27% had measurable antibodies. Nearly all patients (97%) not treated with rituximab experienced seroconversion. Prednisone and methotrexate had a negative effect on seroconversion, but no effect of age or comorbidity was observed. Patients experienced significant improvement after vaccination in 10 out of 12 questions regarding behaviour and fear of COVID-19, while no change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or anxiety was observed. CONCLUSION: We find a very high seroconversion rate among rheumatic patients and reduced self-imposed isolation and shielding after COVID-19 vaccination.

Rituximab-treated rheumatic patients: B cells predict seroconversion after COVID-19 boost or revaccination in initial vaccine non-responders.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of either a booster vaccine (one dose) or revaccination (two doses 3 weeks apart) on the antibody response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in patients with rheumatic disease (RD) treated with rituximab (RTX) who had not produced vaccine-reactive antibodies after the initial two vaccine doses. Further, to examine if B cell levels in peripheral blood predicted seroconversion. METHODS: We included 91 RTX-treated RD patients previously vaccinated against COVID-19. Patients were offered revaccination or a single booster vaccination with an mRNA vaccine. Serum total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured before and 6 weeks after the last vaccine dose. B cells (CD19+CD45+) were measured by flow cytometry at inclusion. RESULTS: Of RD patients with undetectable SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels before inclusion, seroconversion was seen in 38% 6 weeks after the booster dose and 32% after revaccination. Patients receiving revaccination had significantly higher antibody levels than patients receiving a booster dose (P < 0.001). In both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, only B cells higher than 10/µl before boost or revaccination were associated with seroconversion (P = 0.009 and P = 0.01, respectively). Seroconversion was independent of age, gender, diagnosis, cumulative RTX dose, RTX treatment time and time since last RTX treatment. CONCLUSION: Continuously impaired humoral response to mRNA vaccines was found in most RTX-treated patients after a booster dose or revaccination. Seroconversion was observed in approximately one-third of the patients. Measurable B cells before boosting or revaccination was the strongest predictor of antibody response after boost or revaccination.

Left ventricular size and function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus associate with lupus anticoagulant: An echocardiographic follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with increased risk of cardiac dysfunction. The pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood, and prognostic markers are warranted. PURPOSE: We aimed to identify SLE-characteristics associated with measures of cardiac size and function during a five-year follow-up. METHODS: We included 108 patients with SLE: 90% females, mean age 46 ± 13 years, median disease duration 14 (range 7-21) years. We performed blood sampling for potential biomarkers as well as a standard echocardiography at baseline and at a 5-year follow-up. To investigate associations with baseline and prospective 5-year changes in echocardiographic parameters, we performed multivariate regression analyses of SLE-related baseline variables (clinical disease activity, lupus nephritis, chronic kidney disease, anti-cardiolipin and/or anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies, and lupus anticoagulant (LAC)) and adjusted for traditional risk factors. RESULTS: During follow-up, diastolic function regressed in two out of five echocardiographic measures (E/A ratio 1.4 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5, p = 0.002; tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity 2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.2 ± 0.4 mmHg, p < 0.001). Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume index increased (43.7 ± 13.9 vs. 52.5 ± 15.7 mL/m2, p < 0.001). Left and right ventricular systolic function remained stationary. LAC was associated with inferior diastolic function: lower E/A ratio (p = 0.04) and higher E/e' ratio at baseline (p = 0.04) and increased left ventricular atrial volume index during follow-up (p = 0.01). LAC was further associated with LV dilatation during follow-up (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Presence of LAC was associated with measures of diastolic function as well as progressive LV dilatation during the 5-year follow-up. Thus, LAC might be a predictor of cardiac dysfunction in SLE patients. LAC is known to have implications for the microvascular circulation, but the clinical significance of the present findings is yet to be elucidated.

Time Since Rituximab Treatment Is Essential for Developing a Humoral Response to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate (1) whether patients with rheumatic disease (RD) treated with rituximab (RTX) raise a serological response toward the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines, and (2) to elucidate the influence of time since the last RTX dose before vaccination on this response. METHODS: We identified and included 201 patients with RDs followed at the outpatient clinic at the Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, who had been treated with RTX in the period 2017-2021 and who had completed their 2-dose vaccination series with a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Total antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured on all patients and 44 blood donors as reference. RESULTS: We observed a time-dependent increase in antibody response as the interval from the last RTX treatment to vaccination increased. Only 17.3% of patients developed a detectable antibody response after receiving their vaccination ≤ 6 months after their previous RTX treatment. Positive antibody response increased to 66.7% in patients who had RTX 9-12 months before vaccination. All blood donors (100%) had detectable antibodies after vaccination. CONCLUSION: Patients with RDs treated with RTX have a severely impaired serological response toward COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Our data suggest that the current recommendations of a 6-month interval between RTX treatment and vaccination should be reevaluated.

Local and systemic reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.

Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were launched in December 2020. Vaccination of patients with rheumatic diseases is recommended, as they are considered at higher risk of severe COVID-19 than the general population. Patients with rheumatic disease have largely been excluded from vaccine phase 3 trials. This study explores the safety and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 among patients with rheumatic diseases. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), median age 58.8 years, 285 subjects in total, were vaccinated twice with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech). Questionnaires on reactogenicity matching the original phase 3 study were answered seven days after completed vaccination. The majority of SLE and RA patients experienced either local (78.0%) or systemic reactions (80.1%). Only 1.8% experienced a grade-4 reaction. Compared to the original study, we found more frequent fatigue [Odds ratio (OR) 2.2 (1.7-2.8)], headache [OR 1.7 (1.3-2.2)], muscle pain [OR 1.8 (1.4-2.3)], and joint pain [OR 2.3 (1.7-3.0)] in patients. In contrast, the use of antipyretics was less frequent [OR 0.5 (0.3-0.6)]. Patients with SLE and RA experience reactogenicity to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. Reactogenicity was more frequent in patients, however, not more severe compared with healthy controls.

Impaired Antibody Response to the BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: With a vaccine effectiveness of 95% for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (BNT162b2) was the first vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to be approved. However, immunosuppressive therapy was an exclusion criterion in the phase 3 trial that led to approval. Thus, extrapolation of the trial results to patients with rheumatic diseases treated with immunosuppressive drugs warrants caution. METHODS: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; n = 61) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 73) were included from the COPANARD (Corona Pandemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease) cohort, followed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients received the BNT162b2 vaccine between December 2020 and April 2021. All patients had total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 measured before vaccination and 1 week after the second vaccination (VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products). RESULTS: Of 134 patients (median age, 70 years), 77% were able to mount a detectable serological response to the vaccine. Among patients treated with rituximab, only 24% had detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in their serum after vaccination. The time since the last rituximab treatment did not seem to influence the vaccine response. No significant difference was observed between patients with RA or SLE when adjusting for treatment, and no correlation between antibody levels and age was detected (r = -0.12; P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: Antibody measurements against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with RA and SLE after two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine demonstrated that 23% of patients could not mount a detectable serological response to the vaccine. B cell-depleting therapy (BCDT) is of specific concern, and our findings call for particular attention to the patients receiving BCDT.

Reactive arthritis after COVID-19.

A previously healthy 53-year-old man was hospitalised for 12 days due to COVID-19 with shortness of breath. A few days after discharge from hospital, the patient developed fever and severe pain in several joints in the lower extremities. The pain was so severe that the patient was unable to stand on his feet. Synovial fluid from the right-side knee contained a high number of polynuclear cells and a few mononuclear cells. Microscopy, culture and PCR tests for bacterial infection were all negative. Furthermore, the patient tested negative for rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27. Thus, the condition was compatible with reactive arthritis. The condition improved markedly after a few days' treatment with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and prednisolone.

Atherosclerosis and renal disease involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional cohort study.

Objective: To investigate the association between LN, renal function and atherosclerosis measured by coronary artery calcium (CAC) and carotid plaque in a cross-sectional study of patients with SLE. Methods: Presence of CAC and carotid plaque was measured in 147 SLE patients with and without LN. The patients were divided into four groups according to LN and renal function [by first quartile of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): 70 ml/min/1.73 m2]. Impaired renal function was defined by an eGFR <70 ml/min/1.73 m2. We used multivariate logistic regression models to explore the association between LN, renal function, CAC and carotid plaque. Results: Of the 147 SLE patients, 74 had LN. Median age of the study cohort was 46 years, 89% were women and median eGFR was 89 ml/min/1.73 m2. CAC score >0 was present in 57 (39%) and carotid plaque in 29 (20%) of the SLE patients. The presence of CAC and/or carotid plaque was highest in SLE patients with impaired renal function. Regression analyses showed that compared with SLE patients without LN and eGFR ⩾70 ml/min/1.73 m2 (reference group), only the combination of LN and impaired renal function was associated with the presence of CAC (odds ratio: 6.82, 95% CI: 1.59, 29; P = 0.01) and carotid plaque (odds ratio: 5.60, 95% CI: 1.19, 26; P = 0.03). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that LN in combination with impaired renal function defined by an eGFR <70 ml/min/1.73 m2 is strongly associated with the presence of atherosclerosis in SLE.

The risk of cardiovascular morbidity and cardiovascular mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study.

Objective: . To assess the role of LN as a risk factor for myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) in patients with SLE. Methods: . The study was conducted using individual-level data from multiple nationwide registers. We identified a cohort of patients diagnosed with SLE and further determined if they had a diagnosis of LN during 1995-2011. Each SLE patient was matched with five population controls. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to measure the risk of MI, stroke and CVM in SLE patients relative to population controls and in SLE patients with relative to without LN. Results: . We identified 1644 SLE patients with incident SLE; 233 of these patients had a diagnosis of incident LN during follow-up. The number of events in the SLE cohort was: 42 (MI), 74 (stroke) and 56 (CVM). For MI, the HR was 2.2 (95% CI: 1.4, 3.4) in SLE without LN and 18.3 (95% CI: 5.1, 65) in SLE with LN. The HR for LN was 8.5 (95% CI: 2.2, 33; P = 0.002). For stroke, HRs were 2.1 (95% CI: 1.5, 2.9) and 4.1 (95% CI: 1.9, 8.7) in SLE without and with LN, respectively, and we found no significant association with LN (P = 0.115). For CVM, the respective HRs were 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1, 2.4) and 7.8 (95% CI: 3.0, 20). The corresponding HR for LN was 4.9 (95% CI: 1.8, 13.7; P = 0.002). Conclusion: . The risk of MI and CVM, but not of stroke, is significantly higher in SLE patients with LN than SLE patients without LN.

Incidence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis in Denmark: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and SLE with concomitant or subsequent lupus nephritis (LN) in Denmark during 1995-2011, using data from the Danish National Patient Registry (NPR). METHODS: To assess the incidence of SLE, we identified all persons aged ≥ 18 years in the NPR with at least 1 International Classification of Diseases, 10th ed (ICD-10) code of SLE and at least 365 days of followup under this diagnosis. Identification of LN cases was based on fulfillment of these criteria and ≥ 1 registration under an ICD-10 code of nephritis concomitantly with or after first SLE registration. RESULTS: The overall annual incidence rate per 100,000 for SLE was 2.35 (95% CI 2.24-2.49); 0.69 (95% CI 0.60-0.78) for men and 3.96 (95% CI 3.75-4.17) for women. For LN, the mean annual incidence rate per 100,000 was estimated to be 0.45 (95% CI 0.38-0.53); 0.20 (95% CI 0.13-0.28) for men and 0.69 (95% CI 0.57-0.83) for women. The differences in SLE incidence rates between sexes decreased by age, and the incidence did not differ between men and women after the age of 60 years for LN. The estimated incidences showed no trends by calendar time. Estimated overall point prevalence (December 31, 2011) per 100,000 was 45.2 (95% CI 43.3-47.4) and 6.4 (95% CI 5.7-7.2) for SLE and LN, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our Danish population-based data showed a stable incidence of SLE and LN. As expected, we found higher incidence rates among women than among men, particularly in younger persons.

Combining insulins with oral antidiabetic agents: effect on hyperglycemic control, markers of cardiovascular risk and disease.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Unfortunately, several potential barriers exist for CVD risk management in diabetes, including the need for significant lifestyle changes, potential problems with hypoglycemia, weight gain, injection tolerability, treatment complexity with current diabetes therapies and other, unmodifiable factors. Improving glycemic control may impact CVD risk. Treatment of T2DM usually starts with lifestyle changes such as diet and exercise. When these become insufficient, pharmacotherapy is required. Various oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) are available that reduce hyperglycemia. The first line of therapy is usually metformin, since it does not increase weight and seems to have a beneficial effect on CVD mortality and risk factors. As T2DM progresses, insulin treatment becomes necessary for the majority of patients. The last few years have seen the development of long-acting, rapid-acting, and premixed insulin analog formulations. The treat-to-target algorithms of recent studies combining OADs plus insulin analogs have demonstrated that patients can reach glycemic treatment targets with low risk of hypoglycemia, greater convenience, and--with some analogs--limited weight gain vs conventional insulins. These factors may possibly have a positive influence on CVD risk. Future studies will hopefully elucidate the benefits of this approach.

Can the Glycemic Index (GI) be used as a tool in the prevention and management of Type 2 diabetes?

The large increase in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the considerable lifetime risk of diabetes and the loss of lifetime call for concerted action to prevent T2DM and its complications. Since diabetes is characterized by abnormal glucose metabolism, the question arises of whether a high intake of carbohydrates that are rapidly absorbed as glucose may increase the risk and worsen the course of T2DM. To quantify the impact of carbohydrates on blood glucose the glycemic index (GI) and the glycemic load (GL) have been applied. The GI of a food is a method of ranking carbohydrate rich foods according to their glycemic responses. GI is defined as the incremental area under the blood glucose curve of 50g carbohydrate of a test food expressed as a percentage of the area of the response to an equivalent amount of a reference food (glucose or white bread). In relation to GI/GL and prevention of T2DM there is insufficient information from observational studies to determine whether a positive association exists or not. Only randomized controlled clinical intervention studies will be able to provide the final answer. From meta-analyses of randomised controlled clinical trials comparing low and high GI diets in the treatment of diabetes it has been found that low GI diets improve the glycemic control. Labeling of foods with GI would be helpful for persons with diabetes, but the usefulness for healthy subjects remains to be clarified. At present it seems premature to introduce GI labeling for the entire population.