Definition of common carotid wall thickness affects risk classification in relation to degree of internal carotid artery stenosis: the Plaque At RISK (PARISK) study.

BACKGROUND: Mean or maximal intima-media thickness (IMT) is commonly used as surrogate endpoint in intervention studies. However, the effect of normalization by surrounding or median IMT or by diameter is unknown. In addition, it is unclear whether IMT inhomogeneity is a useful predictor beyond common wall parameters like maximal wall thickness, either absolute or normalized to IMT or lumen size. We investigated the interrelationship of common carotid artery (CCA) thickness parameters and their association with the ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis degree. METHODS: CCA thickness parameters were extracted by edge detection applied to ultrasound B-mode recordings of 240 patients. Degree of ICA stenosis was determined from CT angiography. RESULTS: Normalization of maximal CCA wall thickness to median IMT leads to large variations. Higher CCA thickness parameter values are associated with a higher degree of ipsilateral ICA stenosis (p < 0.001), though IMT inhomogeneity does not provide extra information. When the ratio of wall thickness and diameter instead of absolute maximal wall thickness is used as risk marker for having moderate ipsilateral ICA stenosis (>50%), 55 arteries (15%) are reclassified to another risk category. CONCLUSIONS: It is more reasonable to normalize maximal wall thickness to end-diastolic diameter rather than to IMT, affecting risk classification and suggesting modification of the Mannheim criteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov NCT01208025 .

Phase-based vascular input function: Improved quantitative DCE-MRI of atherosclerotic plaques.

PURPOSE: Quantitative pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI can be used to assess atherosclerotic plaque microvasculature, which is an important marker of plaque vulnerability. Purpose of the present study was (1) to compare magnitude- versus phase-based vascular input functions (m-VIF vs ph-VIF) used in pharmacokinetic modeling and (2) to perform model calculations and flow phantom experiments to gain more insight into the differences between m-VIF and ph-VIF. METHODS: Population averaged m-VIF and ph-VIFs were acquired from 11 patients with carotid plaques and used for pharmacokinetic analysis in another 17 patients. Simulations, using the Bloch equations and the MRI scan geometry, and flow phantom experiments were performed to determine the effect of local blood velocity on the magnitude and phase signal enhancement. RESULTS: Simulations and flow phantom experiments revealed that flow within the lumen can lead to severe underestimation of m-VIF, while this is not the case for the ph-VIF. In line, the peak concentration of the m-VIF is significantly lower than ph-VIF (p < 0.001), in vivo. Quantitative model parameters for m- and ph-VIF differed in absolute values but were moderate to strongly correlated with each other [K(trans) Spearman's ρ > 0.93 (p < 0.001) and vp Spearman's ρ > 0.58 (p < 0.05)]. CONCLUSIONS: m-VIF is strongly influenced by local blood velocity, which leads to underestimation of the contrast medium concentration. Therefore, it is advised to use ph-VIF for DCE-MRI analysis of carotid plaques for accurate quantification.