Safety and efficiency of perilesional sclerotherapy in leg ulcer patients with postthrombotic syndrome and/or oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon.

BACKGROUND: The positive effects of perilesional sclerotherapy for venous leg ulcers is well documented. Although many patients with venous leg ulcers require oral anticoagulation or have had a deep vein thrombosis, the effects of these factors on perilesional sclerotherapy are unknown. The aim of this study was to review effects of oral anticoagulation and/or postthrombotic syndrome on perilesional sclerotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 28 patients with venous leg ulcers were observed. 12/28 had a postthrombotic syndrome, 5/12 were on oral anticoagulants (phenprocoumon with INR 2-3). During each treatment session, 1 ml sclerosing foam (1:5, polidocanol 2 %, method of Tessari) was injected. Treatment was continued until all extrafascial veins in the 15cm surrounding the ulcer were closed. RESULTS: Closure of the perilesional veins was achieved in all patients with 2.5 +/- 1.8 injections. In 10 of 28 patients (35.7 %), just one injection was needed. More injections were needed, both in patients with postthrombotic syndrome (3.3 +/- 2.1 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.3) and on anticoagulation with phenprocoumon (4.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.7). There were only two complications: an ascending phlebitis up to the accessory saphenous vein and a superficial erosion at an injection site which healed within 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Perilesional sclerotherapy with foam is a safe and efficient therapy for patients with chronic venous leg ulcers even with postthrombotic syndrome and/ or ongoing anticoagulation.

Increased laser Doppler flow in skin tumors corresponds to elevated vessel density and reactive hyperemia.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Tumor angiogenesis plays a key role in tumor growth and formation of metastasis. Quantitative analysis of tumor blood flow is a prerequisite for developing novel treatment strategies such as antiangiogenic and antivascular treatment options. Laser Doppler flow in malignant melanomas has been shown to be increased compared with normal skin and melanocytic nevi. This study investigated whether this phenomenon is originated by elevated blood vessel density or by reactive hyperemia. METHODS: Laser Doppler flow was studied in 35 melanocytic nevi, 22 malignant melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. After excision digital imaging analysis was performed in microtome sections (factor VIII-associated antigen and CD 31 labelled). The ratio of vessel area in histological sections from tumor tissue and in non-lesional skin was calculated and related to Doppler flow values. RESULTS: Malignant melanomas demonstrated an enlargement of vessel cross-sectional area by factor 3.7+/-1.9 and of Doppler flow by factor 10.56+/-10.7, and melanocytic nevi accomplished increase of vessel cross-sectional area by factor 1.7+/-0.9 and of Doppler flow by factor 2.7+/-3.5. CONCLUSION: The laser Doppler flow is influenced by the number and the velocity of erythrocytes in the tissue. The greater increase of laser Doppler flow than of vessel density in histological sections demonstrates that the flow signal in skin tumors is caused by neovascularization as well as by functional hyperemia. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging is a useful method for non-invasive, repeated and quantitative assessment of tumor vascular network and effects of antiangiogenic treatment directed vs. tumor vasculature in vivo, but it cannot distinguish between increased vessel density and reactive hyperemia.