Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the gut microbiome: An ecological perspective.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is an increasingly prevalent neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsivity. Symptoms emerge from underlying deficiencies in neurocircuitry, and recent research has suggested a role played by the gut microbiome. The gut microbiome is an ecosystem of interdependent taxa involved in an exponentially complex web of interactions, plus host gene and reaction pathways, some of which involve neurotransmitters with roles in ADHD neurocircuitry. Studies have analyzed the ADHD gut microbiome using macroscale metrics such as diversity and differential abundance, and have proposed several taxa as elevated or reduced in ADHD compared to Control. Few studies have delved into the complex underlying dynamics ultimately responsible for the emergence of such metrics, leaving a largely incomplete, sometimes contradictory, and ultimately inconclusive picture. We aim to help complete this picture by venturing beyond taxa abundances and into taxa relationships (i.e. cooperation and competition), using a publicly available gut microbiome dataset (targeted 16S, v3-4 region, qPCR) from an observational, case-control study of 30 Control (15 female, 15 male) and 28 ADHD (15 female, 13 male) undergraduate students. We first perform the same macroscale analyses prevalent in ADHD gut microbiome literature (diversity, differential abundance, and composition) to observe the degree of correspondence, or any new trends. We then estimate two-way ecological relationships by producing Control and ADHD Microbial Co-occurrence Networks (MCNs), using SparCC correlations (p ≤ 0.01). We perform community detection to find clusters of taxa estimated to mutually cooperate along with their centroids, and centrality calculations to estimate taxa most vital to overall gut ecology. We finally summarize our results, providing conjectures on how they can guide future experiments, some methods for improving our experiments, and general implications for the field.

Pyogenic liver abscesses due to Escherichia coli are still related to worse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In western countries, there has been a gradual shift from Escherichia coli to Klebsiella pneumoniae as an emerging pathogen isolated from pyogenic liver abscesses (PLA). AIMS: To compare outcomes between patients with Escherichia coli liver abscesses and non-Escherichia coli liver abscesses in terms of mortality. METHODS: One hundred nine-three consecutive hospital admissions of Pyogenic liver abscesses were analyzed, mean age 66.9 years old (± 13.6), 112 men (58%). The sample was divided into two groups: E. coli liver abscesses and non-E. coli liver abscesses. The etiologic, clinical, and microbiologic characteristics; therapeutic options; and outcomes, in terms of morbidity and mortality, between E. coli and non-E. coli liver abscesses were compared. In-hospital mortality, as outcome variable, was analyzed in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-seven episodes of PLA (29.5%) corresponded to E. coli infections, and 136 (70.5%) to non-E. coli infections. Patients with E. coli PLA were more likely to have jaundice, polymicrobial isolation (57.1% vs 21.6%, p < 0.001), biliary origin (71.9% vs 39%, p < 0.001), and septic shock (38.6% vs 12.5%, p < 0.001). Antibiotic therapy alone, without percutaneous drainage, was less common in the E. coli PLA group (5.3% vs 18.4%, p = 0.018). These patients also showed a higher mortality (28.1% vs 11%, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, E. coli isolation PLA adjusted remained as an independent factor of mortality (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.04-6.56, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: E. coli liver abscess may preclude a worse outcome than other microbiological agents, including the development of septic shock and mortality. Aggressive management must be considered.

Neurofibromatosis tipo 1 (enfermedad de von Recklinghausen) / Neurofibromatosis type 1 (von Recklinghausen's disease)

No disponible