Effect of short-term restricted food intake on canine pseudopregnancy.

A non-pharmaceutical, dietary option may be useful to manage clinical pseudopregnancy (PSP). To describe the effect of short-term food restriction on canine PSP, 16 privately owned, overtly pseudopregnant bitches were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Limit-fed (increasing amounts of a restricted maintenance: 50%, 40%, 30% restriction for 2, 3 and 2 days respectively) during 7 days (n = 8) or Maintenance-fed of the same food and period (n = 8). The bitches were physically examined and blood samples were taken for prolactin and progesterone determinations on days 2, 5 and 8. By day 8, none of the bitches had completely regressed the condition although all (8/8) the animals of the Limit-fed and two (25%) of the Maintenance-fed group improved in condition decreasing mammary size and secretion (p < 0.05). No day or group effects were observed for serum prolactin and progesterone concentrations (>0.05). It is concluded that although an 8-day food restriction did not cure PSP, it seemed to hasten PSP signs involution in these bitches. No endocrine change was related to these clinical findings.

Interruption of the canine estrous cycle with a low and a high dose of the GnRH antagonist, acyline.

To test the efficacy and clinical safety of a low and high dose of the GnRH antagonist, acyline, on estrous cycle interruption and anovulation in female dogs, 20 proestrous (<3d) bitches were randomly assigned to one of the following pharmacological protocols (given sc): acyline 110 microg/kg (ACY-L; n=6); acyline 330 microg/kg (ACY-H; n=8); or placebo (PLACE, n=6). The animals were monitored (clinical and vaginal cytology examinations) daily for 60d. Blood samples for serum progesterone serum concentrations were collected 14d after treatment to determine if ovulation had occurred. Appearance of side effects and days to the onset of the first spontaneous estrous cycle after treatment were also recorded. In both ACY groups, but not the PLACE group, estrous cycles were interrupted after treatment (P<0.05). The interval from treatment to estrus interruption in ACY-L and ACY-H groups was 3.0+/-0.6 and 3.2+/-0.2d, respectively (LSM+/-SEM; P>0.05). In the PLACE bitches, physical, behavioral and cytological proestrus slowly progressed to estrus and diestrus. Ovulation was absent in all ACY, but not in PLACE bitches (P<0.05). None of the females manifested side effects related to the treatments (P>0.05). Spontaneous return to a normal estrous cycle during the study period occurred in all ACY (ACY-L 19.5+/-2.7d vs ACY-H 24.8+/-2.0d; P>0.05), but in none of the PLACE bitches (P<0.05). In conclusion, acyline efficiently, safely and reversibly interrupted an early phase of the estrous cycle in bitches by preventing ovulation.

Short-term progestin treatments prevent estrous induction by a GnRH agonist implant in anestrous bitches.

The objective of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of a short-term progestin treatment administered at two different times to prevent estrous induction in response to the administration of an implant releasing the GnRH agonist, deslorelin acetate (DA), in anestrous bitches. Interestrous intervals (IEI) observed prior to and post DA were compared. Forty-two anestrous bitches, with previous IEI history, were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: PL: placebo sc (n = 12); MA: megestrol acetate 2mg/kg po for 8 days (n = 4); DA: 10mg sc (n = 8); MA&DA-1: MA beginning the day before DA (n = 8); and MA&DA-4: MA beginning 4 days before DA (n = 10). The dose of MA was identical for each treatment. All bitches were examined daily for 1 month and then every 3 months until the next spontaneous post-treatment estrous cycle. Post-GnRH estrous response occurred in 0, 0, 100, 50, and 10% of the PL, MA, DA, MA&DA-1, MA&DA-4, groups, respectively (<0.01). There was an interaction between the treatment and period for the duration of the IEI (< 0.01). Changes in IEI were different among treatments (p<0.01); the three DA-treated groups (147.5% +/- 10.3, 161.3% +/- 14.1, 148.6% +/- 19.2) differed from both the MA (12.9% +/- 17.6) and PL (8.1% +/- 7.8), but not among themselves. It is concluded that an 8 days megestrol protocol and DA on Day 4 was better than DA on Day 1 to prevent estrous response in anestrous bitches and that both protocols significantly increased the IEI.