[What effects does methadone maintenance treatment have on the rehabilitation of heroin addicts?]. / Hvilke effekter har vedlikeholdsbehandling med metadon på rehabilitering av heroinavhengige?

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of methadone maintenance treatment on heroin addicts. By searching in Medline and Cochrane Library two randomized controlled trials were found where methadone was the main intervention in the rehabilitation of heroin addicts. The trials were found among more than 2,350 articles on various aspects of methadone and were the only ones that met our criteria for inclusion in the study. The two studies comprised 347 participants. Both trials showed that methadone maintenance treatment had a positive effect on continuing participation in the treatment programme. One of the trials also showed that the treatment lowered the rates of opioid and cocaine use. It is alarming that only two randomized controlled trials could be found evaluating the effect of methadone maintenance treatment on the rehabilitation of heroin addicts. No trials demonstrating the effect of the treatment on mortality, crime, prostitution or risk behaviour related to communicable diseases were found.

Female urinary incontinence: long-term follow-up after treatment in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Several reports have been published showing that women with urinary incontinence (UI) can be taken care of and treated satisfactorily in general practice. AIM: To find out whether the treatment of women with UI in general practice is effective also in the long term. METHOD: One hundred and five women with UI who consulted their general practitioner (GP) were examined and treated according to a treatment protocol. Treatment options were pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation, oestrogen supplements, bladder training, and protective pads. Three to six years after inclusion, all women received a postal questionnaire to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of treatment. Women who had been referred to a specialist were excluded. RESULTS: Eighty out of 82 eligible patients answered the questionnaire after a mean follow-up period of 56 months. Twenty-seven per cent were continent, 26% much better, 23% a little better, 21% unchanged, and 3% were worse compared with before the treatment. The median score on a 100 mm visual analogue scale was 16 compared with 31 before treatment, and the percentage of women that were 'much' or 'a great deal' bothered by UI was reduced from 35% to 12%. The percentage of women with severe UI was reduced from 59% to 30%, and the number of women using pads was reduced from 62% to 39%. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that management of female UI in general practice is effective also in the long term.

Management in general practice significantly reduced psychosocial consequences of female urinary incontinence.

Urinary incontinence is a common health problem among women, and a spectrum of psychosocial problems is associated with this disorder. We have investigated how psychosocial impact changed during a management programme for urinary incontinence in general practice. One hundred and five women seeking help for urinary incontinence were treated with conservative treatment options. Psychosocial consequences, grouped as mental distress (nine items), practical inconveniences (five items), and social restrictions (11 items) were noted before treatment, and after 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Urge symptoms, high degree of severity, and long duration were associated with higher psychosocial impact. During treatment, psychosocial impact was significantly reduced and the degree of impact in the three consequence groups was reduced to about one third compared with before treatment. In conclusion, changes in psychosocial impact during a management programme occur as a response to successful treatment. These findings support the view that female urinary incontinence can be successfully treated in general practice.

Diagnostic classification of female urinary incontinence: an epidemiological survey corrected for validity.

Diagnostic questions about stress and urge incontinence were validated against a final diagnosis made by a gynecologist after urodynamic evaluation. Thereafter, an epidemiological survey was performed, using similar questions, and correcting the answers for lack of validity. Included were 250 incontinent women at the out-patient clinic and 535 women who reported incontinence in the epidemiological survey. The sensitivity for stress incontinence was 0.66 (95% confidence interval +/- 0.08), specificity 0.88 (+/- 0.06). The corresponding values for urge incontinence were 0.56 (+/- 0.15) and 0.96 (+/- 0.03), and for mixed incontinence 0.84 (+/- 0.10) and 0.66 (+/- 0.07). Using these indices of validity as corrective measures for the diagnostic distribution reported in the epidemiological survey, the percentage of stress incontinence increased from 51 to 77%, while mixed incontinence was reduced from 39 to 11%. Pure urge incontinence increased from 10 to 12%. Mixed incontinence will be overreported in epidemiological surveys. Correction for validity indicates that a larger majority than hitherto reported may have pure stress incontinence.

Female urinary incontinence--consultation behaviour and patient experiences: an epidemiological survey in a Norwegian community.

The objective was to study explanatory factors for help-seeking among incontinent women, and what was the outcome of the treatment. A questionnaire was mailed to all 2366 women aged 20 or over in the rural community of Rissa, Norway. Women confirming incontinence gave information about duration, precipitating factors, frequency, amount of leakage, and impact. Questions about doctor consultation or planned consultation, treatment and results were included. Women with incontinence which had resolved without treatment were also recorded. A total of 77% answered the questionnaire. Twenty per cent of women with incontinence (n = 535) had consulted a doctor, 18% had planned to consult. Increasing age and duration, and urge/mixed type of incontinence were determinative factors for doctor consultation, while increasing severity and impact were determinative for planned consultation. Drugs, exercises, pads, and electrostimulation were all important treatment options: 21% were cured, 40% much better after treatment. Of all the women, 8% reported that they had been incontinent in the past, and only 18% of these had consulted a doctor.

Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim was to validate a simple severity index of female urinary incontinence for subsequent use in an epidemiological survey. DESIGN: The index was created by multiplying the reported frequency (four levels) by the amount of leakage (two levels). The resulting index value (1-8) was further categorised into slight (1-2), moderate (3-4), and severe (6-8). It was validated against a 48 hour "pad weighing" test. Thereafter, an anonymous postal questionnaire survey was performed and the index was used to assess the severity of the leakage. A question about the impact of incontinence was also included. SETTING: The outpatient clinic of the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Trondheim University Hospital and the rural community of Rissa, Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Altogether 116 incontinent women referred to the clinic by their GP and all 2366 adult women living in Rissa. RESULTS: The difference in median pad weights between moderate and slight incontinence was 9g/24h (95% confidence interval 0-27). The corresponding difference between severe and moderate incontinence was 17g/24h (95% CI 5-30). In the epidemiological survey 29.4% reported urinary incontinence (response rate 77%). The prevalence tended to be highest in middle life and old age. Forty six per cent were classified as slight, 27% moderate, and 27% severe. There was a strong correlation between severity and impact (R = 0.59, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The severity index may be a useful tool for assessing the severity of female urinary incontinence in epidemiological surveys. It is confirmed that urinary incontinence is very prevalent in adult women, but most should not be regarded as potential patients.