Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Br J Haematol ; 190(6): 854-863, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32519351

ABSTRACT

Richter syndrome (RS) is an uncommon evolution of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) with a dismal prognosis. Clinical-biological features predicting outcome and best therapeutic approach for these patients remain to be established. In this study, 128 patients with RS, including 112 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-type RS, 15 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)-type RS, and one plasmablastic lymphoma, were identified in 11 centres of the Spanish CLL Study Group (GELLC). The median overall survival (OS) was 5·9 months for DLBCL-type RS and 30·8 months for HL-type RS. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, haemoglobin level, platelet count, serum lactate dehydrogenase and ß2-microglobulin levels, tumour protein p53 (TP53) abnormalities in the CLL clone concomitant to RS, number of prior therapies, and clonal relationship between CLL and RS, were associated with OS in patients with DLBCL-type RS. A platelet count of <100 × 109 /l, prior CLL therapy (0 vs. ≥1), and presence of TP53 alterations maintained an independent prognostic impact in the multivariate analysis. Patients without any of these factors had a better clinical outcome, with a median OS of 75·3 months, while patients with one or two or more of these factors presented a median OS of 25·5 and 3 months, respectively. Although OS of patients with RS is generally poor, a proportion of patients achieved prolonged survival. Treatment of RS remains a medical need, and further therapeutic approaches with novel therapies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hodgkin Disease/blood , Hodgkin Disease/genetics , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/blood , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/blood , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/genetics , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/mortality , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Survival Rate , Syndrome
2.
Br J Haematol ; 178(6): 959-970, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28573819

ABSTRACT

Eltrombopag is a second-line treatment in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, its role in secondary ITP is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in secondary ITP in daily clinical practice. Eighty-seven secondary ITP patients (46 with ITP secondary to autoimmune syndromes, 23 with ITP secondary to a neoplastic disease subtype: lymphoproliferative disorders [LPDs] and 18 with ITP secondary to viral infections) who had been treated with eltrombopag were retrospectively evaluated. Forty-four patients (38%) had a platelet response, including 40 (35%) with complete responses. Median time to platelet response was 15 days (95% confidence interval, 7-28 days), and was longer in the LPD-ITP group. Platelet response rate was significantly lower in the LPD-ITP than in other groups. However, having achieved response, there were no significant differences between the durable response of the groups. Forty-three patients (49·4%) experienced adverse events (mainly grade 1-2), the commonest being hepatobiliary laboratory abnormalities. There were 10 deaths in this case series, all of which were related to pre-existing medical conditions. In routine clinical practice, eltrombopag is effective and well-tolerated in unselected patients with ITP secondary to both immune and infectious disorders. However, the response rate in LPD-ITP is low.


Subject(s)
Benzoates/therapeutic use , Hydrazines/therapeutic use , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , Benzoates/administration & dosage , Benzoates/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Hydrazines/administration & dosage , Hydrazines/adverse effects , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Count , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/blood , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/etiology , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Receptors, Thrombopoietin/agonists , Retrospective Studies , Virus Diseases/complications
3.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 148(8): 381.e1-381.e9, abr. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-161625

ABSTRACT

Antecedentes y objetivo: El amplio arsenal terapéutico junto con la heterogeneidad biológica de los pacientes hace que sea difícil estandarizar el tratamiento de la leucemia linfocítica crónica (LLC) en la práctica clínica. Estas consideraciones han motivado la preparación del presente documento de consenso, que se trata de una actualización de la versión publicada en 2013, prestando especial atención a las estrategias de tratamiento que han aparecido en los últimos 5 años, como los inhibidores del receptor de células B (ibrutinib e idelalisib), los nuevos anticuerpos monoclonales anti-CD20 (ofatumumab y obinutuzumab) y los inhibidores de Bcl-2 (venetoclax). Material y métodos: Un grupo de expertos del Grupo Español de Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica ha revisado la bibliografía publicada entre 2010 y 2016 para poder establecer una serie de recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia clínica. En aquellas áreas donde no se encontró una evidencia científica, el grupo de expertos estableció recomendaciones por consenso con base en sus experiencias clínicas. Resultados: Como resultado del proyecto se ha establecido un conjunto de recomendaciones de carácter práctico que facilitarán el diagnóstico, el tratamiento y el seguimiento de los pacientes con LLC. Conclusiones: Existen muchos aspectos del tratamiento de la LLC que resultan ser temas controvertidos sobre los que no hay estudios apropiados para generar recomendaciones de forma consensuada (AU)


Background and objective: The broad therapeutic arsenal and the biological heterogeneity of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) makes it difficult to standardize treatment for CLL patients with specific clinical settings in routine clinical practice. These considerations prompted us to elaborate the present consensus document, which constitutes an update of the previous version published in 2013, mainly focusing on novel treatment strategies that have been developed over last 5 years, namely B-cell receptor inhibitors (ibrutinib and idelalisib), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (ofatumumab and obinutuzumab), and Bcl-2 inhibitors (venetoclax). Material and methods: A group of experts from the Spanish Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Group reviewed all published literature from January 2010 to January 2016, in order to provide recommendations based on clinical evidence. For those areas without strong scientific evidence, the panel of experts established consensus criteria based on their clinical experience. Results: The project has resulted in several practical recommendations that will facilitate the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with CLL. Conclusions: There are many controversial issues in the management of CLL with no appropriate studies for making consensus recommendations (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnosis , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/therapeutic use , Antigens, CD20/analysis , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Consensus , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Risk Groups
4.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 148(8): 381.e1-381.e9, 2017 Apr 21.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28236475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The broad therapeutic arsenal and the biological heterogeneity of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) makes it difficult to standardize treatment for CLL patients with specific clinical settings in routine clinical practice. These considerations prompted us to elaborate the present consensus document, which constitutes an update of the previous version published in 2013, mainly focusing on novel treatment strategies that have been developed over last 5 years, namely B-cell receptor inhibitors (ibrutinib and idelalisib), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (ofatumumab and obinutuzumab), and Bcl-2 inhibitors (venetoclax). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of experts from the Spanish Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Group reviewed all published literature from January 2010 to January 2016, in order to provide recommendations based on clinical evidence. For those areas without strong scientific evidence, the panel of experts established consensus criteria based on their clinical experience. RESULTS: The project has resulted in several practical recommendations that will facilitate the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with CLL. CONCLUSIONS: There are many controversial issues in the management of CLL with no appropriate studies for making consensus recommendations.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/complications , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnosis , Piperidines , Purines/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Quinazolinones/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use
6.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 14(4): 305-18, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24468131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We have evaluated the ex vivo pharmacology of single drugs and drug combinations in malignant cells of bone marrow samples from 125 patients with acute myeloid leukemia using a novel automated flow cytometry-based platform (ExviTech). We have improved previous ex vivo drug testing with 4 innovations: identifying individual leukemic cells, using intact whole blood during the incubation, using an automated platform that escalates reliably data, and performing analyses pharmacodynamic population models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Samples were sent from 24 hospitals to a central laboratory and incubated for 48 hours in whole blood, after which drug activity was measured in terms of depletion of leukemic cells. RESULTS: The sensitivity of single drugs is assessed for standard efficacy (EMAX) and potency (EC50) variables, ranked as percentiles within the population. The sensitivity of drug-combination treatments is assessed for the synergism achieved in each patient sample. We found a large variability among patient samples in the dose-response curves to a single drug or combination treatment. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that the use of the individual patient ex vivo pharmacological profiles may help to guide a personalized treatment selection.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Marrow Cells/drug effects , Bone Marrow Cells/pathology , Cell Survival/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Monitoring , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Drug Synergism , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Precision Medicine , Treatment Outcome
7.
Br J Haematol ; 157(1): 67-74, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22224845

ABSTRACT

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) whose tumour cells harbour a 17p deletion (17p-) are universally considered to have a poor prognosis. The deletion can be detected at diagnosis or during the evolution of the disease, particularly in patients who have received chemotherapy. We sought to evaluate the natural history of patients with 17p- CLL, identify predictive factors within this prognostic subgroup, and evaluate the results of different therapeutic approaches. Data from 294 patients with 17p- CLL followed up at 20 different institutions was retrospectively collected and analysed. Median age was 68 (range 27-98) years at the time of fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. After 17p- documentation, 52% received treatment, achieving an overall response rate of 50%. Median overall survival was 41 months, and was significantly shorter in patients with elevated beta(2)-microglobulin concentration (P < 0·001), B symptoms (P = 0·016), higher percentage of cells with deletion (P < 0·001), and acquired deletions (P = 0·012). These findings suggest that patients with 17p- CLL have a variable prognosis that can be refined using simple clinical and laboratory features, including 17p- clone size, beta2-microglobulin concentration, presence of B symptoms and type of deletion (de novo versus acquired).


Subject(s)
Chromosome Deletion , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17 , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Smith-Magenis Syndrome , Survival Rate , beta 2-Microglobulin/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...