Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 221(10): 582-586, dic. 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-227037

ABSTRACT

Objetivos Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el desempeño, antes y durante la pandemia de la COVID-19, de la definición de caso de sospecha de influenza en la vigilancia comunitaria en México. Métodos Se llevó a cabo un análisis transversal de un estudio de cohorte y, con el fin de confirmar o descartar la infección por virus influenza, se analizaron los casos que cumplían con los criterios de caso sospechoso (n = 20.511) y con evidencia concluyente de laboratorio (reacción cuantitativa en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real). Resultados Se documentaron una alta sensibilidad y una discreta especificidad, que posteriormente disminuyó, así como su precisión diagnóstica, durante el brote de la COVID-19. Sin embargo, no se observaron diferencias en el área bajo la curva de características operativas del receptor entre los períodos analizados. Conclusión La definición de caso evaluada sigue siendo una alternativa rentable para identificar a los pacientes que pueden beneficiarse de los medicamentos antivirales específicos contra la influenza, incluso durante el brote mundial de COVID-19 (AU)


Objective This study aimed to evaluate the performance, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, of the case definition of suspected influenza used in community surveillance in Mexico. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study was perfomed and cases that met the suspected case criteria (n = 20,511) and that had laboratory-conclusive evidence (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) to confirm or discard influenza virus infection, were analysed. Results A high sensitivity and modest specificity were documented, which later decreased during the COVID-19 outbreak, as well as its diagnostic accuracy. However, no significant differences were observed in the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve among the analysed periods. Conclusion The evaluated case definition remains to be a cost-effective alternative for identifying patients who may benefit from influenza-specific antiviral drugs, even during the global COVID-19 outbreak (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Epidemiological Monitoring , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , /epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cohort Studies , Mexico/epidemiology , Prevalence
2.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 221(10): 582-586, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34839891

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the performance, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, of the case definition of suspected influenza used in community surveillance in Mexico. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study was performed and cases that met the suspected case criteria (n = 20,511) and that had laboratory-conclusive evidence (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) to confirm or discard influenza virus infection were analysed. RESULTS: A high sensitivity and modest specificity were documented, which later decreased during the COVID-19 outbreak, as well as its diagnostic accuracy. However, no significant differences were observed in the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve among the analysed periods. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated case definition remains to be a cost-effective alternative for identifying patients who may benefit from influenza-specific antiviral drugs, even during the global COVID-19 outbreak.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Public Health ; 195: 123-125, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34089950

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival experience of suspicion COVID-19 hospitalized patients with pneumonia and negative baseline reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test results. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Mexico. METHODS: Adult pneumonia inpatients fulfilling suspected COVID-19 criteria, and hospital entry from March to August 2020, were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier method was to use to compare survival estimates among patients with negative RT-qPCR nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs and those with a baseline positive test. RESULTS: Data from 64,624 individuals fulfilling suspected COVID-19 criteria were analyzed and 1.6% of them had negative RT-qPCR tests. The overall mortality rate was higher among laboratory-positive patients (48.5% vs. 34.2%, P < 0.001) and, at any given threshold, the survival estimates were higher among RT-qPCR-negative pneumonia inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: The pathogenic mechanism of COVID-19 remains poorly understood and suspected cases with pneumonia and negative laboratory results represent a major challenge for healthcare systems. Our findings suggest that RT-qPCR-negative inpatients may have an improved disease prognosis, but the in-hospital mortality was still high among them. However, further research is needed to clarify the clinical and epidemiological implications of our results.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Pneumonia/mortality , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
4.
Public Health ; 193: 113-115, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33774512

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate factors predicting severe symptomatic laboratory-confirmed (via Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR polymerase chain reaction) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection. STUDY DESIGN: This is a nationwide retrospective cohort study that was conducted in Mexico. METHODS: Data from 258 reinfection cases (at least 28 days between both episodes onset) were analyzed. We used risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate predictors of severe (dyspnea requiring hospital admission) secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: The risk of severe disease was 14.7%, and the observed overall fatality rate was 4.3%. Patients with more serious primary disease were more likely to develop severe symptoms (39.5% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001) during reinfection. In multiple analysis, factors associated with an increased risk of severe symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 reinfection were increasing age (RRper year = 1.007, 95% CI = 1.003-1.010), comorbidities (namely, obesity [RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01-1.24], asthma [RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.06-1.50], type 2 diabetes mellitus [RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.07-1.38]), and previous severe laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.03-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating disease outcomes in a large set of laboratory-positive cases of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, and factors associated with illness severity were characterized. Our results may contribute to the current knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity and to identify populations at increased risk of a poorer outcome after reinfection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Reinfection/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Comorbidity , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Laboratories , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Reinfection/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Symptom Assessment , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Public Health ; 190: 1-3, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33316477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The mortality of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is high, and data regarding its prognosis are scarce. We aimed to assess the survival experience and determining factors in adult inpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide and retrospective cohort study. Data from 66,123 individuals were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was fitted. RESULTS: The 7-day survival was 72.2% and went to 47.6%, 35.0%, and 23.9% on days 15, 21, and 30 of hospital stay, respectively. In the multiple analysis, factors associated with an increased risk of dying were male gender, age, pneumonia at hospital admission, immunosuppression, and personal history of chronic non-communicable diseases. Reduced risk of a fatal outcome was observed among patients with asthma history. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study analyzing the survival probability in a large subset of Latin-American adults with COVID-19, in whom the disease burden has been high. Our results contribute to achieving a better understanding of disease evolution.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Length of Stay , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Rev Clin Esp ; 221(10): 582-586, 2021 Dec.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33024341

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the performance, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, of the case definition of suspected influenza used in community surveillance in Mexico. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study was perfomed and cases that met the suspected case criteria (n = 20,511) and that had laboratory-conclusive evidence (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) to confirm or discard influenza virus infection, were analysed. RESULTS: A high sensitivity and modest specificity were documented, which later decreased during the COVID-19 outbreak, as well as its diagnostic accuracy. However, no significant differences were observed in the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve among the analysed periods. CONCLUSION: The evaluated case definition remains to be a cost-effective alternative for identifying patients who may benefit from influenza-specific antiviral drugs, even during the global COVID-19 outbreak.

7.
Public Health ; 189: 153-157, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33246302

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify factors predicting laboratory-positive coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pediatric patients with acute respiratory symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Data from 1849 individuals were analyzed. COVID-19 was confirmed (reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction) in 15.9% of patients, and factors predicting a positive test result were evaluated through prevalence odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Increasing age, personal history of obesity, and household contact with a case were found to be associated, in the multiple regression model, with increased odds of a positive test result. Young patients residing in areas with higher population sizes, as well as those with severe respiratory symptoms, were less likely to be laboratory confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification and isolation of children and teenagers with suggestive symptoms of COVID-19 is important to limit viral spread. We identified several factors predicting the laboratory test result. Our findings are relevant from a public health policy perspective, particularly after the restart of in-person academic activities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adolescent , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
8.
Stat Med ; 24(7): 983-92, 2005 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15568204

ABSTRACT

Some HIV vaccine candidates have a potential VE I (vaccine efficacy for infectiousness) type effect, which tends to reduce the viral load and may reduce infectiousness of an infected individual. In general, the efficacy of this kind of vaccine is very difficult to assess because it requires information on contacts of vaccinated infected individuals, and current methods to estimate VE I rely on the time elapsed between infections of an individual and his/her sexual partner, thus making infection of the sexual partner necessary to assess the efficacy. To avoid behavioural changes that may affect the estimates, HIV status is kept undisclosed to participants, which raises many ethical questions. Here we present a method that allows immediate notification of HIV status to both members of a couple, reducing the risk of infection when one of them has not been infected and allowing immediate medical treatment. The method allows for estimation of any VE I and VE S (vaccine efficacy for susceptibility) effect, and it is robust to the most common situations found in these type of studies, namely: differential risk of participants, staggered enrollment and small sample sizes.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/standards , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV/growth & development , AIDS Vaccines/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Research Design , Sexual Partners
9.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 10(1): 6-12, 2001 Jul.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11558250

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In order to investigate the variables that could have the greatest impact on larval indices of Aedes aegypti, the main vector of dengue, a descriptive, longitudinal study was carried out in the city of Colima, which is located in the Mexican Pacific coastal state of the same name. METHODS: A total of 187 dwellings were inspected to determine the house index (HI) and the number of positive containers per house (C+/H), during the rainy season and the dry season. The following were recorded as independent variables: the air temperature, the season, the use of ultra low volume (ULV) spraying of malathion, the Premise Condition Index (PCI), and the score on a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). RESULTS: Both the multivariate logistic regression and the multivariate lineal regression showed a reduction of HI and C+/H due to the effect of the dry season. Paradoxically, the temperature seemed to have a negative correlation with the larval indices, and this effect was more pronounced during the dry season. The PCI showed the most significant correlation with HI and C+/H, independently of the other variables. The ULV sprayings showed a small negative effect on the indices, while the KAP score did not indicate any association at all. CONCLUSIONS: Some conclusions that can be drawn from this study are as follows: higher temperatures can reduce the larval indices during the dry season, the PCI can be an adequate estimator of the Ae. aegypti infestation rate, ULV spraying reduces the number of larval breeding sites, and the KAP score has little association with the larval indices.


Subject(s)
Aedes , Animals , Larva , Mexico , Population Density , Seasons
10.
Stat Med ; 20(13): 1983-6, 2001 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11427954

ABSTRACT

A common situation in vaccine efficacy (VE) estimation is dealing with non-randomly mixing populations, which may subject vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals to a different infection pressure. These conditions may lead to a bias in VE estimates. The derivation of the statistical distribution of the number of vaccinated and infected out of a sample of n infections in a VE trial is essential to develop estimates and their properties. For randomly mixing populations, it has been shown recently that this follows a hypergeometric distribution for 'all/nothing' vaccines, whereas it is a non-central hypergeometric distribution for 'leaky' ones. Here it is shown that these distributions still hold under non-random mixing conditions, provided that mixing preferences and contact rates are independent of vaccination status. These conditions are met when vaccine and placebo are randomized.


Subject(s)
Models, Immunological , Vaccination/standards , Vaccines/immunology , Humans , Vaccines/standards
11.
Stat Med ; 19(6): 827-35, 2000 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10734286

ABSTRACT

We derive the distribution of the number of infections among unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals for model 1 (leaky) and model 2 (all/nothing) vaccines, assuming random mixing of a homogeneous population. For all/nothing vaccines, we show that the distribution of the number of infected vaccinated individuals conditioning on n observed infections follows a hypergeometric distribution, and the vaccine efficacy estimate (VE) can be derived from the usual estimate of the total population size in a capture-recapture sampling program. For leaky vaccines, we show that the number of vaccinated infected follows a distribution that was first derived by Wallenius. We found that the current point estimates of VE for each model perform very well, but the urn model construction presented here provides a strong framework for estimation and hypothesis testing on the parameters, and can be applied when the available data are a sample of the population. Since the method does not require an underlying transmission model, it can be applied to estimate the VE for non-contagious diseases.


Subject(s)
Models, Statistical , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/transmission , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged
12.
Math Biosci ; 161(1-2): 95-104, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10546443

ABSTRACT

In this paper a regenerative argument is used to derive an expression for the expectation of the integral under the stochastic path of a birth-death Markov process up to extinction time as well as for the expected time to extinction. Some applications to classical-birth-death processes are given.


Subject(s)
Birth Rate , Markov Chains , Models, Biological , Mortality , Computer Simulation , Humans , Logistic Models , Monte Carlo Method , Poisson Distribution , Systems Theory
13.
Bull Math Biol ; 61(2): 341-53, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17883213

ABSTRACT

A method is presented to estimate the minimum viable metapopulation size based on the basic reproductive number R(0) and the expected time to extinction tau(E) for epidemiological models. We exemplify our approach with two simple deterministic metapopulation models of the patch occupancy type and then proceed to stochastic versions that permit the estimation of the minimum viable metapopulation size.


Subject(s)
Basic Reproduction Number , Models, Biological , Population Dynamics , Animals , Conservation of Natural Resources , Ecosystem , Extinction, Biological , Stochastic Processes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...