Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am Surg ; 89(11): 4640-4643, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36113130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates that residency programs incorporate cost awareness into patient care. This presents a challenge for surgical residents because they must understand operating room costs in addition to other expenses. Trainees' understanding of operating room supply costs is not well understood. METHODS: A survey was distributed to surgical residents (N = 73) at an urban, university-based residency program. Residents estimated the costs of 21 single-use operating room items. Descriptive statistics and a regression analysis were calculated. RESULTS: The response rate was 62%. Respondents accurately estimated costs for a median of 7/21 items, with error ranging from 26% to 5438%. They substantially underestimated the three highest-cost items. Increasing post-graduate year did not improve estimation accuracy (ß = .233, P = .138). DISCUSSION: Residents have a poor understanding of single-use item costs, and this does not improve with post-graduate training, suggesting inefficiencies. There is opportunity to educate residents and ultimately decrease surgical health care costs.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Humans , Operating Rooms , Education, Medical, Graduate , Surveys and Questionnaires , Accreditation
2.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 38(8): 1393-1400, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31381402

ABSTRACT

In 2016 the newly appointed surgeon general of the Navy launched a value-based health care pilot project at Naval Hospital Jacksonville to explore whether multidisciplinary care teams (known as integrated practice units, or IPUs) and measurement of outcomes could improve the readiness of active duty personnel and lower the cost of delivering care to them, their dependents, and local retirees. This article describes the formation of the project's leadership structure, the selection of four conditions to be treated (low back pain, osteoarthritis, diabetes, and high-risk pregnancy), the creation of the care team for each condition, outcomes and costs measured, and the near-term changes in outcomes during the twelve-month pilot period. Patient outcomes improved for three of the four conditions. We describe factors that contributed to the project's success. After the pilot concluded, the Navy combined the back pain and osteoarthritis IPUs into a single musculoskeletal clinical unit and established a similar IPU at another naval hospital and its clinics. The diabetes IPU was continued, but the high-risk pregnancy IPU was not. We offer several observations on the elements that were key to the success of the project, explore challenges and opportunities, and suggest that the pilot described here could be taken to greater scale in the Military Health System and elsewhere.


Subject(s)
Naval Medicine/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Back Pain/economics , Back Pain/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Health Care Costs , Humans , Leadership , Naval Medicine/economics , Naval Medicine/methods , Osteoarthritis/economics , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Pilot Projects , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...