Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 190(4): 949-55, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18356441

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonates are a group of drugs used in the treatment of oncology patients with bone metastases. However, in the past few years, osteonecrosis of the jaw has been reported as a serious complication of such treatment. The objective of this study was to examine the use of MRI in the assessment of bone lesions caused by this disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients were studied who had been treated with i.v. bisphosphonates and had developed focal lesions of osteonecrosis of the jaw. These patients were referred by the stomatology department of Hospital General Universitario de Valencia. We evaluated both the morphology and the behavior of the lesions in T1, STIR, and after the administration of gadolinium. RESULTS: Twenty-six focal lesions were detected clinically and 36 were detected radiologically. All the clinically detected focal lesions were visible on MRI. There were 15 focal lesions detected radiologically that were not detected on clinical examination. In all patients, it was possible to assess bone involvement and involvement of the bone marrow, soft tissues, sinuses, and mandibular canal as well as the presence of adenopathy. CONCLUSION: MRI is an effective tool in the assessment of osteonecrosis of the jaw. The significance of focal lesions detectable on radiologic examination but without clinical correlation and their progression over time remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mandibular Diseases/chemically induced , Mandibular Diseases/pathology , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/pathology , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 13(2): 102-109, feb. 2008. ilus
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-67298

ABSTRACT

No disponible


The clinical signs and symptoms of greatest semiologic value in temporomandibular joint disease (TMJD) are muscle pain, joint pain, limitations in mandibular movement, and joint sounds. Imaging studies of the joint are very useful for establishing the diagnosis and for discarding other disease processes, though in many cases diagnostic error results from the detection of a large proportion of patients with alterations in the imaging studies but with no associated clinical manifestations. Panoramic X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging are the most commonly used complementary techniques for diagnosing TMJD. MRI may be regarded as the imaging technique of choice, particularly when studying the soft tissues. Biochemical evaluation of the joint synovial fluid has improved our understanding of TMJD pathogenesis, though to date such parameters have not been extended to clinical practice.Myofascial pain with positive painful palpation of the masticatory muscles; joint disc displacements with reduction characterized by the presence of opening or opening and closing clicks; disc displacements without reduction characterized by limitations in oral aperture; and osteoarthritis / osteoarthrosis characterized by the auscultation of friction sounds during mandibular movement, are the morbidity processes most often seen in the context of TMJD. The present study offers a review of the semiology and morbidity processes of the temporomandibular joint


Subject(s)
Humans , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Facial Pain/physiopathology , Bone Malalignment/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology
3.
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 13(2): 138-142, feb. 2008. ilus
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-67305

ABSTRACT

No disponible


Objectives: A comparative study is made of two types of flaps in semi-impacted third molar surgery and their relation to the postoperative period (pain, swelling and trismus).Material and methods: Twenty-five healthy patients were subjected to surgical extraction of both semi-impactedlower third molars, located in a similar clinical and radiographic position. In 25 cases the wound was sutured using a reflection flap (healing by first intention), while in the 25 contralateral cases the conventional technique was used (simple approximation of the wound margins). Pain, swelling and trismus were evaluated, during the first week of the postoperative period.Results: There was lesser pain, swelling and trismus after extraction of a semi-impacted third molar when healing took place by second intention (simple approximation of the margins), than in the case of healing by first intention (flap repositioning and margin-to-margin suturing).Conclusions: The postoperative course proved worse when using a reflection flap for healing by first intention than on suturing by simple approximation of the wound margins


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth Extraction/methods , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Surgical Flaps , Suture Techniques , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
4.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 13(2): E102-9, 2008 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18223525

ABSTRACT

The clinical signs and symptoms of greatest semiologic value in temporomandibular joint disease (TMJD) are muscle pain, joint pain, limitations in mandibular movement, and joint sounds. Imaging studies of the joint are very useful for establishing the diagnosis and for discarding other disease processes, though in many cases diagnostic error results from the detection of a large proportion of patients with alterations in the imaging studies but with no associated clinical manifestations. Panoramic X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging are the most commonly used complementary techniques for diagnosing TMJD. MRI may be regarded as the imaging technique of choice, particularly when studying the soft tissues. Biochemical evaluation of the joint synovial fluid has improved our understanding of TMJD pathogenesis, though to date such parameters have not been extended to clinical practice. Myofascial pain with positive painful palpation of the masticatory muscles; joint disc displacements with reduction characterized by the presence of opening or opening and closing clicks; disc displacements without reduction characterized by limitations in oral aperture; and osteoarthritis / osteoarthrosis characterized by the auscultation of friction sounds during mandibular movement, are the morbidity processes most often seen in the context of TMJD. The present study offers a review of the semiology and morbidity processes of the temporomandibular joint.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Humans , Radiography , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging
5.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 13(2): E138-42, 2008 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18223532

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A comparative study is made of two types of flaps in semi-impacted third molar surgery and their relation to the postoperative period (pain, swelling and trismus). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five healthy patients were subjected to surgical extraction of both semi-impacted lower third molars, located in a similar clinical and radiographic position. In 25 cases the wound was sutured using a reflection flap (healing by first intention), while in the 25 contralateral cases the conventional technique was used (simple approximation of the wound margins). Pain, swelling and trismus were evaluated, during the first week of the postoperative period. RESULTS: There was lesser pain, swelling and trismus after extraction of a semi-impacted third molar when healing took place by second intention (simple approximation of the margins), than in the case of healing by first intention (flap repositioning and margin-to-margin suturing). CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative course proved worse when using a reflection flap for healing by first intention than on suturing by simple approximation of the wound margins.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third/surgery , Surgical Flaps , Suture Techniques , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology
6.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 12(4): E292-8, 2007 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17664915

ABSTRACT

Pathology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) affects an important part of the population, though it is not viewed as a public health problem. Between 3-7% of the population seeks treatment for pain and dysfunction of the ATM or related structures. The literature reports great variability in the prevalence of the clinical symptoms (6-93%) and signs (0-93%), probably as a result of the different clinical criteria used. In imaging studies it is common to observe alterations that have no clinical expression of any kind. Radiographic changes corresponding to osteoarthrosis are observed in 14-44% of the population. Age is a risk factor, though with some particularities. In elderly patients there is an increased prevalence of clinical and radiological signs, though also a lesser prevalence of symptoms and of treatment demands than in younger adults. Approximately 7% of the population between 12 and 18 years of age is diagnosed with mandibular pain-dysfunction. Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) is more frequent in females. No clear relationship has been established between occlusal alterations and TMJ disease. Only disharmony between centric relation and maximum intercuspidation, and unilateral crossbite, have demonstrated a certain TMJ disease-predictive potential. Both local and systemic hyperlaxity has been postulated as a possible cause of TMD. Parafunctional habits and bruxism are considered risk factors of TMD with odds ratios (ORs) of up to 4.8. Psychophysiological theory holds stress as a determinant factor in myofascial pain. Genetic factors and orthodontic treatment have not been shown to cause TMD.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Risk Factors , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/classification , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/etiology
7.
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 12(4): E292-E298, ago. 2007. ilus, tab
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-056853

ABSTRACT

La patología de la articulación temporomandibular (ATM) afecta a un colectivo importante de población aunque no se considere un problema de salud pública. Entre el 3 y el 7% de la población busca tratamiento a causa del dolor y la disfunción de sus ATMs o estructuras anexas. Los estudios encuentran una extraordinaria variabilidad en cuanto a prevalencia de síntomas (6-93%) y en cuanto a signos clínicos (0-93%), variación que está probablemente relacionada con los diferentes criterios clínicos utilizados. En los estudios de imagen es frecuente el hallazgo de signos sin que estos se traduzcan en sintomatología clínica alguna. Se observan cambios radiográficos de osteoartrosis entre el 14 y el 44% de la población. La edad constituye un factor de riesgo aunque con matices. En pacientes ancianos hay mayor prevalencia de signos clínicos y radiográficos, pero menor prevalencia de síntomas y de demanda de tratamiento que en pacientes de edad adulta. Alrededor del 7% de la población entre 12 y 18 años es diagnosticada de dolor-disfunción mandibular


Pathology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) affects an important part of the population, though it is not viewed as a public health problem. Between 3-7% of the population seeks treatment for pain and dysfunction of the ATM or related structures. The literature reports great variability in the prevalence of the clinical symptoms (6-93%) and signs (0-93%), probably as a result of the different clinical criteria used. In imaging studies it is common to observe alterations that have no clinical expression of any kind. Radiographic changes corresponding to osteoarthrosis are observed in 14-44% of the population. Age is a risk factor, though with some particularities. In elderly patients there is an increased prevalence of clinical and radiological signs, though also a lesser prevalence of symptoms and of treatment demands than in younger adults. Approximately 7% of the population between 12 and 18 years of age is diagnosed with mandibular pain-dysfunction. Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) is more frequent in females. No clear relationship has been established between occlusal alterations and TMJ disease. Only disharmony between centric relation and maximum intercuspidation, and unilateral crossbite, have demonstrated a certain TMJ disease-predictive potential. Both local and systemic hyperlaxity has been postulated as a possible cause of TMD. Parafunctional habits and bruxism are considered risk factors of TMD with odds ratios (ORs) of up to 4.8. Psychophysiological theory holds stress as a determinant factor in myofascial pain. Genetic factors and orthodontic treatment have not been shown to cause TMD


Subject(s)
Humans , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/classification , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Bruxism/complications , Stress, Physiological/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...