ABSTRACT
Resumen La infección por coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave ha provocado un cambio en la forma de atender a los pacientes con enfermedades hematológicas en todo el mundo. Los pacientes con síndrome mielodisplásico (SMD) se han visto afectados por la ausencia de conocimiento del comportamiento de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) en este tipo de padecimiento. Se han establecido lineamientos internacionales que han permitido continuar con la atención de dichos pacientes. El principal objetivo de esta revisión es definir las medidas preventivas y las estrategias de tratamiento que se deben de tomar al momento de evaluar a un paciente con SMD en la época COVID-19.
Abstract SARS-CoV-2 infection has caused a change in the way we care for patients with hematological diseases around the world. Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have been affected by the lack of knowledge of the behavior of COVID-19 in this type of condition. International guidelines have been established that have made it possible to continue caring for these patients. The main objective of this review is to define the preventive measures and treatment strategies that should be taken when evaluating a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome in the COVID-19 era.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Flow cytometry (FC) is a helpful tool for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Different FC score systems have been developed. The "Ogata score" is a simple diagnostic score that has been validated having a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 92% in low-risk MDS. We aimed to study the feasibility and the utility of the "Ogata score" for the diagnosis of MDS among Latin America (LA) Laboratories. METHODS: This is a case and control study conducted in LA institutions members of Grupo Latinoamericano de Mielodisplasia (GLAM). A total of 146 MDS patients and 57 control patients were included. "Ogata score" was calculated. RESULTS: The sensitivity of "Ogata score" was 75.6% (95% CI, 66.8-81.3), specificity was 91.2% (95% CI, 79.7-96.7), PPV was 95.6% (95% CI, 88.5-98.3), and NPV was 65.4% (95% CI, 49.1-71.9). In low/intermediate-1 IPSS patients group, the sensitivity was 70.1% (95% CI, 60.2-78.2), specificity was 91.2% (CI-95%, 79.7-96.7), PPV was 94.2% (95% CI, 86.4-97.8), and NPV was 62.1% (95% CI, 53.0-78.7). In the group of patients "without MDS specific markers" (patients without ring sideroblasts, blast excess, or chromosomal abnormalities), the sensitivity was 66.7% (CI-95%, 55.8-76.0), specificity was 91.2% (95% CI, 79.7-96.7), PPV was 92.3% (95% CI, 82.2-97.1), and NPV was 63.5% (95% CI, 51.9-73.5). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic power found in this study was similar to the reported by Della-Porta et al. Also in LA, the analysis was made in modern equipment with acquisition of at least 100 000 events which permits a good reproducibility of the results.
