Defining and diagnosing involuntary emotional expression disorder.

Uncontrollable episodes of emotional expression occur in a variety of neurological conditions. This emotional disinhibition syndrome is characterized by episodes of crying or laughing that are unrelated to or out of proportion to the eliciting stimulus. This syndrome is common among patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and traumatic brain injury and a variety of terms and definitions have been used to describe it. The confusing nomenclature has been a barrier to understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of this disorder. The authors propose a unifying term, involuntary emotional expression disorder (IEED), and provide diagnostic criteria for this disorder.

Multiple sclerosis mimics.

Even with all the newer diagnostic tools, including MRI with multiple sequences, evoked potentials, CSF studies, and so forth, multiple sclerosis remains a clinical diagnosis. In the past it was, to a large extent, a wastebasket diagnosis. Since we really could not do much about it, if our diagnosis was wrong it really didn't matter a great deal. Now, with an increasing number of effective therapies and with good therapies for some of the MS mimics, accurate diagnosis is a must. In addition to the cost of treatment, many of the current treatments such as Mitoxantrone (Novantrone) are not benign and we should not subject our patients to unnecessary harmful therapies.

Eight-year immunogenicity and safety of interferon beta-1a-Avonex treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis.

An open-label extension study of the phase III trial of intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IFNbeta-1a-Avonex) was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of IFNbeta-1a-Avonex over six years in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients who participated in the pivotal phase III study were offered enrolment; entry was also open to patients who had not participated. All patients received IFNbeta-1a-Avonex 30 microg intramuscularly once weekly for six years, for a treatment duration of up to eight years in patients who received IFNbeta-1a-Avonex in the phase III trial. Serum levels of IFNbeta antibodies were measured every six months using a screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by an antiviral cytopathic effect assay to detect neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in serum samples positive on ELISA. The incidence of adverse events and laboratory test results assessed safety. Of 382 total patients, 218 had participated in the phase III study (103 placebo, 115 IFNbeta-1a-Avonex) and 164 had not participated; 24 of the 164 were IFNbeta-naïve. At baseline, 281 patients were negative for IFNbeta antibodies (NAb-). NAbs (titre > or = 20) developed at any time over six years in 5% of these patients. Of 140 patients who had been on IFNbeta-1b-Betaseron, 49 were positive for NAbs (NAb+) at baseline; 11 of 115 who had been on IFNbeta-1a-Avonex were NAb+ at baseline. Thirty-nine of 49 patients who had been on Betaseron and were NAb+ had titres < 100; 36 of these 39 seroconverted to NAb- while on IFNbeta-1a-Avonex, with a median time of approximately six months. Ten patients who had been on Betaseron had NAb titres > or = 100; five remained NAb+ during six years on IFNbeta-1a-Avonex and five seroconverted to NAb-, but only after at least two years. Five patients who had been on IFNbeta-1a-Avonex during the clinical trial were NAb+ with titres < 100 at baseline; four seroconverted to NAb-, with a median time of two to three years. Six patients who had been on IFNbeta-1a-Avonex had NAb titres > or = 100; five of these remained NAb+ at six years. No patient with a NAb titre > 1000 seroconverted to NAb-, whether initially treated with IFNbeta-1a-Avonex or -Betaseron. Adverse events were similar to those observed in the pivotal phase III trial. Results from this trial indicated that IFNbeta-1a-Avonex was associated with a low incidence of NAbs and was well tolerated for up to eight years. Further, the results indicate that persistence of NAbs is dependent on titre and IFNbeta product.

Medical hypothesis: why secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is a relentlessly progressive illness.

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is a relentlessly progressive, usually ascending, disease process. Once secondary progression begins, regardless of how long the disease was present before secondary progression began, patients appear to progress at a uniform rate. Recent studies show that it responds poorly to medications effective in relapsing remitting disease, although these drugs decrease relapses and have a substantial effect on lesions seen on magnetic resonance imaging. Disruption of axonal transport is known to occur in demyelinated fibers. Synapses, vacated when axons are destroyed, cause sprouting in surviving terminal axons, resulting in metabolic overload in the terminal axons. This noninflammatory process would not be expected to be altered by current disease-altering therapies.