Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Gesundheitswesen ; 79(4): e39-e49, 2017 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27097312

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Exposure to recreational noise is becoming increasingly important due to a change in leisure behavior amongst children and adolescents. The aim of this pilot study was to assess exposure of 6th grade pupils to recreational noise from portable listening devices (PLD). Furthermore, preventive measures to reduce recreational noise exposure should be identified. Methods: In "Ohrkan Kids", 38 Bavarian pupils aged 11 to 14 were interviewed regarding their music listening behavior using a standardized questionnaire. In addition, measurements of commonly used volume settings on the children's portable listening devices were carried out. Furthermore, the German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV), health insurance companies as well as health and education ministries of the German federal states were surveyed regarding their activities in the prevention of recreational noise exposure. Results: Based on the questionnaire data for weekly usage, 10 out of 31 children (32.3%) exceeded the upper exposure value of 85 dB recommended by labor protection law. Taking actually measured values, 9 out of 31 children (29%) exceeded this level. The DGUV and some federal states carry out specific projects for the prevention of recreational noise exposure. Conclusion: The large number of children with hazardous music consumption indicates that measures for the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss are already required for 11 to 14 year olds. To maximize the number of children addressed, age-appropriate and target-group-specific preventive measures are needed. As there are only few studies which examined the effectiveness of awareness campaigns for the prevention of recreational noise, any future prevention projects should be evaluated with an increased focus on estimating their effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/prevention & control , Noise/adverse effects , Recreation , Students/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Music , Pilot Projects , Prevalence , Risk Factors
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 60(5): 336-42, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12709518

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bioaerosol pollution of workplace and home environments mainly affects airways and mucous membranes. The effect of environmental outdoor residential bioaerosol pollution, for example, livestock holdings, farming, and waste disposal plants, is unclear. AIMS: To investigate the perceived health of residents living in areas with measurable outdoor bioaerosol pollution (for example, spores of Aspergillus fumigatus and actinomycetes), and effects of accompanying odours. METHODS: In a cross sectional study, double blinded to ongoing microbial measurements, doctors collected 356 questionnaires from residents near a large scale composting site, and from unexposed controls in 1997. Self reported prevalence of health complaints during the past year, doctors' diagnoses, as well as residential odour annoyance were assessed. Microbiological pollution was measured simultaneously in residential outdoor air. RESULTS: Concentrations of >10(5) colony forming units of thermophilic actinomycetes, moulds, and total bacteria/m(3) air were measured 200 m from the site, dropping to near background concentrations within 300 m. Positive adjusted associations were observed for residency within 150-200 m from the site versus unexposed controls for self reported health complaints: "waking up due to coughing", odds ratio (OR) 6.59 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.57 to 17.73); "coughing on rising or during the day", OR 3.18 (95% CI 1.24 to 8.36); "bronchitis", OR 3.59 (95% CI 1.40 to 9.4); and "excessive tiredness", OR 4.27 (95% CI 1.56 to 12.15). Reports of irritative airway complaints were associated with residency in the highest bioaerosol exposure, 150-200 m (versus residency >400-500 m) from the site, and period of residency more than five years, but not residential odour annoyance. Lifetime prevalence of self reported diseases did not differ with exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Bioaerosol pollution of residential outdoor air can occur in concentrations found in occupational environments. For the first time residents exposed to bioaerosol pollution were shown to report irritative respiratory complaints similar to mucous membrane irritation independently of perceived odours.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...