Induction of EROD activity by 1-phenylimidazole and beta-naphthoflavone in rainbow trout cultured hepatocytes: a comparative study.

The classical pathway for induction of cytochrome P4501A (CYP1A) by xenobiotics is ligand binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). However, several studies with mammalian cell systems point out a range of xenobiotics including imidazole derivatives, which are able to activate CYP1A through non-classical mechanisms. The objective of the present work is to compare induction of CYP1A (determined at the catalytic level as 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase, EROD) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes by the prototypic AhR ligand, beta-naphthoflavone (betaNF), and by the imidazole derivative, 1-phenylimidazole (PIM). PIM was able to induce EROD activity although its potency was clearly lower than that of betaNF. In order to assess the relative importance of classical AhR ligand binding and alternative signaling pathways in CYP1A induction by PIM, co-exposure experiments with the partial AhR antagonist alpha-naphthoflavone (alphaNF) or with inhibitors of protein kinase C (staurosporine) and tyrosine kinases (genistein, herbimicine) were performed. alphaNF and herbimicin provoked a decrease of EROD induction both by betaNF and PIM, whereas staurosporine and genistein remained without effect. The overall similarities in the response of betaNF and PIM to the various inhibitors suggest that both compounds, in apparent contrast to the behaviour of some other imidazole derivatives, induce CYP1A following similar mechanisms.

Cytochrome P4501A induction caused by the imidazole derivative Prochloraz in a rainbow trout cell line.

A variety of aquatic pollutants are able to induce cytochrome P4501A (CYP1A) in fish by ligand binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). High-affinity AhR ligands are planar aromatic polycyclic molecules such as the prototypical ligand, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The present work investigates the ability of the imidazole derivative, Prochloraz (PRO), to induce CYP1A. Computational studies on the molecular structure of PRO indicated that it is highly unlikely for PRO to have both aromatic rings of the molecule, i.e. the imidazole and the benzene ring, in the same plane. Thus, the possible conformers do not take planar structures, in contrast to the typically planar AhR ligands. Experimentally, the capability of PRO to induce CYP1A was assessed using the rainbow trout liver cell line, RTL-W1, as in vitro model. PRO increased in a concentration-dependent way the catalytic activity of CYP1A (determined as 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase, EROD, activity) in RTL-W1 cells. The potency of PRO was lower than that of a reference AhR-ligand, beta-naphthoflavone (betaNF). In addition to the catalytic level, PRO activated CYP1A also at the transcriptional level as determined by RT-PCR analysis of CYP1A mRNA. These results indicate that PRO, although its structure is not corresponding to the typical features of CYP1A-inducing AhR ligands, still is able to activate CYP1A expression.

Feasibility of high-performance immunochromatography as an isolation method for PCBs and other dioxin-like compounds.

A high performance immunochromatographic procedure to isolate polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and other dioxin-like compounds from a sample is shown. Development of the procedure includes (i) synthesis of the hapten, binding it to the spacer arm and to the carrier protein to make the immunizing molecule; (ii) raising and purification of anti-PCB antibodies; (iii) building of the immunocolumn; (iv) selection of the binding, rinsing, and elution conditions adequate for these highly lipophilic compounds; (v) study of the influence of the concentration and volume of sample on recovery; and (vi) study of the selectivity of the immunosystem for dioxins, furans, PCBs, and several insecticides of different toxicity. Evaluation of the method is carried out by analyzing the fractions retained and nonretained in the immunocolumn by GC/MS. The immunochromatographic system that is developed shows itself to be feasible as cleanup and isolation steps carried out prior to GC/MS analyses. When compared to classical cleanup and isolation methods traditionally used for analysis of PCBs in water, the immunochromatographic method is > 20x faster and uses 100x less organic solvents, and its selectivity is enormously enhanced. Good recoveries are obtained with both kinds of methods. The immunochromatographic procedure fulfils the acceptance criteria indicated by the EPA, even for sub-parts-per-billion concentrations.