The use of 1.5-anhydroglucitol for monitoring glycemic control in islet transplant recipients.

We evaluated whether 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) (GlycoMark(®)), a test for measuring postprandial glucose and glucose variability, could be a tool for assessing short-term glycemic control in islet cell transplant (ICT) subjects. Data of 21 subjects, with type 1 DM and allogenic islet transplantation, who had concomitant fructosamine, HbA1c, 1,5-AG (n = 85 samples), and capillary glucose self-monitoring measurements (n = 2,979) were analyzed retrospectively at different time points after ICT. A significant negative association was observed between 1,5-AG and HbA1c (p = 0.02), but not with fructosamine. When HbA1c was divided in quartiles as <5.6, 5.6-5.9, 5.9-6.2, and >6.2, a decrease of an estimated 0.70 ± 0.30 µg/ml in 1,5-AG was associated with each quartile of increase in HbA1c (p < 0.0001). There was a significant decline of 1.64 ± 0.3mg/dl in postprandial glucose values for each 1 unit increase in 1,5-AG (p < 0.0001). For those with HbA1c ≥ 6.0% when 1,5-AG was ≥8.15 µg/ml, the mean estimated glucose level was 103.71 ± 3.66 mg/dl, whereas it was 132.12 ± 3.71 mg/dl when 1,5-AG was <8.15 µg/ml. The glucose variability (Glumax - Glumin) in subjects with 1,5-AG <8.15 µg/ml was 46.23 mg/dl greater than the subjects with 1,5-AG ≥8.15 µg/ml (HbA1c ≥ 6.0%). There was no significant association between GlycoMark and glucose variability where HbA1c < 6%. 1,5-AG significantly associated with postprandial glucose levels and glucose variability in ICT recipients with near-normal HbA1c (6.0-6.5%) levels. These findings suggest that 1,5-AG can be used to differentiate those ICT subjects with higher glucose variability despite having near-normal HbA1c. However, prospective studies are needed to evaluate the association between GlycoMark levels and the parameters of graft dysfunction/failure.

Campath-1H induction therapy in African American and Hispanic first renal transplant recipients: 3-year actuarial follow-up.

BACKGROUND: In a retrospective study of the first 75 primary renal transplant patients given alemtuzumab induction at our center, 20 were African American (27%), 32 were Hispanic (43%), and 23 were non-African American, non-Hispanic (31%). METHODS: Alemtuzumab was given intraoperatively and 4 days later (0.3 mg/kg), with planned low-dose maintenance mycophenolate mofetil (500 mg twice daily) and tacrolimus (targeted trough levels of 5 to 7 ng/ml) and no corticosteroid therapy after the first week. Median follow-up among ongoing survivors with a functioning graft was 45 months. RESULTS: Three-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 95% and 85% in African Americans, 89% and 78% in Hispanics, and 96% and 96% in non-African Americans, non-Hispanics, respectively (not significant). Bioavailability of tacrolimus was significantly lower among African Americans in comparison with the other patient subgroups (P

A randomized trial of thymoglobulin vs. alemtuzumab (with lower dose maintenance immunosuppression) vs. daclizumab in renal transplantation at 24 months of follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: A long-term prospective randomized trial evaluating alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, in a predominantly non-Caucasian population has yet to be reported. METHODS: Ninety deceased donor (DD) first renal transplant recipients were randomized into three different antibody induction groups: group A, thymoglobulin (Thymo); group B, alemtuzumab; group C, daclizumab (Dac). In groups A and C, the target trough levels of tacrolimus were 8-10 ng/mL, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1 g administered twice daily, and maintenance methylprednisolone. In group B, target tacrolimus trough levels were 4-7 ng/mL, 500 mg MMF administered twice-daily, without methylprednisolone. African-Americans and Hispanics comprised more than 50% in each group. RESULTS: A minimum follow-up of 27 months showed no overall group differences in patient or graft survival (p = 0.89 and 0.66), but a trend towards worse death-censored graft survival in group B (p = 0.05). Acute rejection rates were not significantly different: six (20%), seven (23%), and seven (23%) in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy was higher in group B than in A and C (p = 0.008). The mean calculated creatinine clearance at 24 months was 81.1 +/- 5.5, 64.4 +/- 4.5, and 80.7 +/- 5.7 in groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = 0.01 for B vs. average of A and C). CONCLUSION: In this randomized 27-month minimum follow-up trial of predominantly non-Caucasian DD renal transplant recipients with alemtuzumab induction, lower maintenance tacrolimus, MMF, and steroid avoidance appear less effective than either Thymo or Dac with higher maintenance immunosuppression.