Racial differences in cesareans: an analysis of U.S. 2001 National Inpatient Sample Data.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial differences in potentially unnecessary cesareans in the United States. METHODS: The 2001 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to analyze various maternal demographic and clinical parameters among women having cesarean deliveries. For the purpose of our study, if there were no diagnoses related to cesarean delivery on the discharge certificate, the cesarean was classified as potentially unnecessary RESULTS: Using our methodology, 11% of 540,174 primary and 65% of 371,863 repeat cesareans for the year 2001 in the United States were classified as potentially unnecessary. After controlling for age, payment source, ZIP income, admission day, region of the country, and hospital size, location, and teaching status, black women had a higher likelihood of having potentially unnecessary primary cesareans when compared with white (P < .001) or Hispanic women (P < .001). White women had a higher likelihood of having potentially unnecessary repeat cesareans than black women (P < .001), although the magnitude of the odds ratio for race was not as striking as in primary cesarean. Potentially unnecessary primary cesareans were also more likely to occur in women aged 35 years or older, Medicare patients, weekend admissions, or those residing in the South or Northeast. Potentially unnecessary repeat cesareans were more likely to occur in women younger than 35 years, in rural hospitals, and in weekday admissions. CONCLUSION: In the United States, racial differences exist in the proportion of cesarean deliveries that are potentially unnecessary. Further exploration of these differences is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Unnecessary cesarean delivery in Louisiana: an analysis of birth certificate data.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the temporal trends and factors that are associated with cesarean deliveries and potentially unnecessary cesarean deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: The Louisiana birth certificate database was evaluated to identify a total of 57 potential indications/risk factors and maternal demographic factors that are associated with methods of delivery over the period from January 1993 to December 2000. A cesarean delivery without any potential indications/risk factors in the birth certificate was classified as unnecessary. RESULTS: The primary cesarean delivery rate decreased and the repeat cesarean delivery rate increased significantly during the study period. But neither the absence nor the presence of potential indications/risk factors accounted for these changes. The average potentially unnecessary primary and repeat cesarean deliveries in Louisiana were 17 and 43, respectively, per 100 cesarean deliveries over the years 1993 through 2000. CONCLUSION: The proportions of potentially unnecessary cesarean deliveries are relatively high in Louisiana. It is important to explore the influence of nonclinical factors on unnecessary cesarean delivery to reduce the cesarean rates.