Modified Oblique Lobenhoffer (MOL) approach for posterolateral and posteromedial column access in tibial plateau fractures: a detailed cadaveric anatomical study.

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial (PM) and posterolateral (PL) columns are complex injuries that require an appropriate approach. The management of the PL column in these cases can be controversial, and limitations using deep posteromedial interval approaches have been referenced. In this paper, a modification of the Lobenhoffer approach, designed to optimize the access to the PL column, is described in detail. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of this approach in a cadaveric anatomical study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used for detailed anatomical study surrounding the approach. Relationships with cutaneous and deep neurovascular structures were evaluated. The exposure area of the PL and PM columns using this approach was assessed. RESULTS: The cadaveric study showed safe and adequate exposure. Oblique skin and fascia incision just medial to the posterior midline was safe to protect the medial sural cutaneous nerve and the small saphenous vein. Elevation of the popliteus and tibialis posterior muscles offered safe protection of the anterior tibial artery and popliteal neurovascular bundle during retractor placement. Adequate full proximal exposure of the PM and PL columns, including the posterolateral lateral (PLL) and posterolateral central (PLC) segments, was obtained in all specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Oblique Lobenhoffer (MOL) approach can be a feasible option to access PL and PM columns in tibial plateau fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures with Cephalomedullary Nails: Single Head Screw vs. Dual Integrated Compression Screw Systems.

Extracapsular hip fractures are very common in the elderly. They are mainly treated surgically with an intramedullary nail. Nowadays, both endomedullary hip nails with single cephalic screw systems and interlocking double screw systems are available on the market. The latter are supposed to increase rotational stability and therefore decrease the risk of collapse and cut-out. A retrospective cohort study was carried out, in which 387 patients with extracapsular hip fracture undergoing internal fixation with an intramedullary nail were included to study the occurrence of complications and reoperations. Of the 387 patients, 69% received a single head screw nail and 31% received a dual integrated compression screw nail. The median follow-up was 1.1 years, and in that time, a total of 17 reoperations were performed (4.2%; 2.1% for single head screw nails vs. 8.7% for double head screws). According to the multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex and basicervical fracture, the adjusted hazard risk of reoperation required was 3.6 times greater when using double interlocking screw systems (p = 0.017). A propensity scores analysis confirmed this finding. In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of using two interlocking head screw systems and the increased risk of reoperation in our single center, we encourage to other researchers to explore this question in a wider multicenter study.

Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity as Prognostic Factors in Arthroscopic Repair of Chronic Rotator Cuff Tears.

Metabolic diseases such as obesity and diabetes mellitus seem to have an influence on reoperation and long-term functional outcomes after arthroscopic repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. High prevalence of these pathologies can be found in the Canary Islands. A retrospective cohort study was carried out, in which 80 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery for the repair of chronic rotator cuff tears were included, with a minimum follow up of 5 years, to study the occurrence of complications, reoperation, and functional outcomes. Functionality after surgery improved in 75% of patients with diabetes and remained the same or worsened in 25% (OR = 1.444). In the group of non-diabetic patients, 83.9% had improved function after surgery while it remained the same or worsened in 16.1% (OR = 0.830). Functionality after surgery improved in 76.6% of obese patients and remained the same or worsened in 23.4% (OR = 1.324). In the non-obese group, 87.9% had improved function after surgery, while it remained the same or worsened in 12.1% (OR = 0.598). Despite not obtaining statistically significant differences, the analysis of the results obtained suggests that obesity and diabetes could act by decreasing the subjective improvement in functionality after surgery, and, in the case of obesity, also increase the risk of reoperation.