A Minimum Cost Consensus-Based Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Framework Considering Experts' Limited Compromise and Tolerance Behaviors.

This study proposes a minimum cost consensus-based failure mode and effect analysis (MCC-FMEA) framework considering experts' limited compromise and tolerance behaviors, where the first behavior indicates that a failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) expert might not tolerate modifying his/her risk assessment without limitations, and the second behavior indicates that an FMEA expert will accept risk assessment suggestions without being paid for any cost if the suggested risk assessments fall within his/her tolerance threshold. First, an MCC-FMEA with limited compromise behaviors is presented. Second, experts' tolerance behaviors are added to the MCC-FMEA with limited compromise behaviors. Theoretical results indicate that in some cases, this MCC-FMEA with limited compromise and tolerance behaviors has no solution. Thus, a minimum compromise adjustment consensus model and a maximum consensus model with limited compromise behaviors are developed and analyzed, and an interactive MCC-FMEA framework, resulting in an FMEA problem consensual collective solution, is designed. A case study, regarding the assessment of COVID-19-related risk in radiation oncology, and a detailed sensitivity and comparative analysis with the existing FMEA approaches are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach to FMEA consensus-reaching.

Consistency-Driven Methodology to Manage Incomplete Linguistic Preference Relation: A Perspective Based on Personalized Individual Semantics.

In linguistic decision-making problems, there may be cases when decision makers will not be able to provide complete linguistic preference relations. However, when estimating unknown linguistic preference values in incomplete preference relations, the existing research approaches ignore the fact that words mean different things for different people, that is, decision makers have personalized individual semantics (PISs) regarding words. To manage incomplete linguistic preference relations with PISs, in this article, we propose a consistency-driven methodology both to estimate the incomplete linguistic preference values and to obtain the personalized numerical meanings of linguistic values of the different decision makers. The proposed incomplete linguistic preference estimation method combines the characteristic of the personalized representation of decision makers and guarantees the optimum consistency of incomplete linguistic preference relations in the implementation process. Numerical examples and a comparative analysis are included to justify the feasibility of the PISs-based incomplete linguistic preference estimation method.

Game-Theoretic Learning for Sensor Reliability Evaluation Without Knowledge of the Ground Truth.

Sensor fusion has attracted a lot of research attention during the few last years. Recently, a new research direction has emerged dealing with sensor fusion without knowledge of the ground truth. In this article, we present a novel solution to the latter pertinent problem. In contrast to the first reported solutions to this problem, we present a solution that does not involve any assumption on the group average reliability which makes our results more general than previous works. We devise a strategic game where we show that a perfect partitioning of the sensors into reliable and unreliable groups corresponds to a Nash equilibrium of the game. Furthermore, we give sound theoretical results that prove that those equilibria are indeed the unique Nash equilibria of the game. We then propose a solution involving a team of learning automata (LA) to unveil the identity of each sensor, whether it is reliable or unreliable, using game-theoretic learning. The experimental results show the accuracy of our solution and its ability to deal with settings that are unsolvable by legacy works.