Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
1.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med ; 19(1): 4, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654305

ABSTRACT

Healthcare professionals often face ethical conflicts and challenges related to decision-making that have necessitated consideration of the use of conscientious objection (CO). No current guidelines exist within Spain's healthcare system regarding acceptable rationales for CO, the appropriate application of CO, or practical means to support healthcare professionals who wish to become conscientious objectors. As such, a procedural framework is needed that not only assures the appropriate use of CO by healthcare professionals but also demonstrates its ethical validity, legislative compliance through protection of moral freedoms and patients' rights to receive health care. Our proposal consists of prerequisites of eligibility for CO (individual reference, specific clinical context, ethical justification, assurance of non-discrimination, professional consistency, attitude of mutual respect, assurance of patient rights and safety) and a procedural process (notification and preparation, documentation and confidentiality, evaluation of prerequisites, non-abandonment, transparency, allowance for unforeseen objection, compensatory responsibilities, access to guidance and/or consultative advice, and organizational guarantee of professional substitution). We illustrate the real-world utility of the proposed framework through a case discussion in which our guidelines are applied.


Subject(s)
Conscientious Refusal to Treat , Spain , Humans , Conscientious Refusal to Treat/ethics , Guidelines as Topic , Refusal to Treat/ethics , Refusal to Treat/legislation & jurisprudence
2.
J Bioeth Inq ; 2023 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37882950

ABSTRACT

Background Ethical conflicts generate difficulties in daily clinical activity. Which methods of ethical advice are most frequently used to resolve them among Spanish doctors has not been studied. The objective of this study is to describe what methods hospital internal medicine physicians in Spain use to resolve their ethical doubts and which they consider most useful. Design A cross-sectional observational study was conducted through a voluntary and anonymous survey and distributed through an ad hoc platform of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. Measures We measured methods by which to resolve doubts, types of tools sought, frequency of consulting the Clinical Ethics Committees, and satisfaction with resolution of ethical issues. Results Of 261 internists surveyed, 86 per cent resolve their ethical doubts with assistance, the most frequently used method being consultation with colleagues (58.6 per cent), followed by using specific protocols or guides (11.8 per cent) and consultation with experts in bioethics (9.6 per cent). The most preferred tools are the creation of protocols (30.3 per cent) and the establishment of a consultant/expert in bioethics (27.8 per cent). Conclusions Internists in Spain usually seek assistance to resolve their ethical doubts. Consulting colleagues is the most frequently adopted method. The majority regard tools to resolve ethical conflicts as necessary, seeking above all protocols and consultants/experts in bioethics.

3.
Acta bioeth ; 29(2)oct. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1519854
4.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics ; : 1-6, 2023 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36627821

ABSTRACT

Since 2002, legislation in Spain has allowed for the creation and documentation of end-of-life decisionmaking. Over the intervening years, the actual implementation of such documents is very low. Through extensive analysis of the literature, this article explores the current status of the use of and attitudes toward advance directives in Spain and then proposes strategies for improvement in their implementation.

5.
HEC Forum ; 35(4): 325-335, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092518

ABSTRACT

Movies can serve valuable didactic purposes teaching clinical ethics to medical students. However, using film sequences as means to develop critical thinking is not a straightforward task. There is a significant gap in the literature regarding how to analyse the ethical content embedded in these clips systematically, in a way that facilitates the students' transition from anecdotal reflections to abstract thinking. This article offers a pedagogical proposal to approach the ethical analysis of film sequences in a systematic fashion. This structured stepwise method encourages students to identify the main ethical problem of a selected scene and to reflect on the theoretical principles involved, emphasizing the application of these norms and values in a contextually situated analysis. We believe this method in film studies both reinforces the students' comprehension of the theoretical framework of an ethical topic, and casts light on its pertinence and limitations under the circumstances of the scene, thus proving a constructive tool to strengthen the bridge between the theoretical teaching of clinical ethics and clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Motion Pictures , Students, Medical , Humans , Thinking , Ethical Analysis , Ethics, Medical
6.
J Forensic Leg Med ; 90: 102393, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35792399

ABSTRACT

This article aims to analyse the excited delirium syndrome, especially, when Law Enforcement Officers have to make use of force and deaths in custody occur. Through a bibliographic review, inferences have been obtained to identify, in first place, what a death in custody is and the differences between positional asphyxia and excited delirium syndrome. Subsequently, we have summarized the major findings that the medical examiner should look for in order to diagnose the excited delirium syndrome from the scene examination, the autopsy and the complementary analysis. Finally, we propose some directives that may help to avoid the death of these subjects and to study them in case they occur.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Substance-Related Disorders , Delirium/diagnosis , Humans , Police , Restraint, Physical , Spain/epidemiology
7.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med ; 17(1): 5, 2022 03 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35292071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the first weeks of March 2020 in Spain, the cases of severe respiratory failure progressively increased, generating an imbalance between the clinical needs for advanced life support (ALS) measures and the effective availability of ALS resources. To address this problem, the creation of triage committees (TC) was proposed, whose main function is to select the best candidates to receive ALS. The main objective of our study is to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients evaluated by the TC of the Alcorcón Foundation University Hospital (AFUH) during the first wave of SARS CoV-2. Other objectives are to determine if there are differences between the patients considered candidates / not candidates for ALS and to analyze the functioning of the TC. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all patients assessed by the AFUH TC. RESULTS: There were 19 meetings, in which 181 patients were evaluated, 65.4% male and with a mean age of 70.1 years. 31% had some degree of functional dependence, the Barthel median was 100 and Charlson 4. 58.5% were not considered a candidate for ALS at that time. The patients considered candidates to receive ALS were younger (72 vs 66; p < 0.001), had less comorbidity (Charlson 4 vs 3; p < 0.001) and had a better previous functional situation. A median of 5 physicians participated in each meeting and, after being assessed by the TC, 13.6% received ALS: 29.3% of those considered candidates for ALS and 2% of the non-candidates. CONCLUSIONS: The patients evaluated by the TC had a mean age of 70 years, high comorbidity and almost a third had some degree of functional dependence. More than half were not considered candidates for ALS at that time, these patients being older, with more comorbidity and a worse previous functional situation. TC decisions, based on objective clinical criteria, were almost always respected. Public institutions must get involved in triage procedures, which should and in our opinion must include the creation of TC in health centers. The implementation of Anticipated Decision programs (ADP) would help enable patients affected by triage decisions to participate in them.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Triage , Advanced Cardiac Life Support , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies
8.
Emergencias ; 34(1): 47-54, 2022 02.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103443

ABSTRACT

TEXT: Emergency services' main purpose is to save lives, but that worthy mission cannot always be accomplished. When caring for patients toward the end of life, we have an ethical obligation to talk with them and their relatives to obtain consensus on treatment and possibly limit it or adjust management in accordance with the patient's condition. Emergency department protocols are necessary for optimizing care to provide the greatest possible comfort and control of symptoms in patients at the end of life to prevent unnecessary suffering and preserve dignity. This article sets out recommendations - including the principles and ethical standards that underlie them - so that emergency services can develop end-of-life care protocols for use in their own settings.


TEXTO: Los servicios de uUrgencias (SU) tienen como objetivo primordial salvar vidas, pero no debemos olvidar que esta misión encomiable no siempre es posible y, cuando se atienden pacientes en la última fase de la vida, existe la obligación ética de dialogar con ellos y sus familiares para conseguir un consenso y limitar o adecuar el manejo clínico de acuerdo a su situación vital. Con este objetivo, los SU deben tener protocolos de cuidados dirigidos a optimizar el confort y control de síntomas de los pacientes en la fase final de la vida, con el fin de evitar sufrimientos innecesarios y preservar su dignidad personal. El presente artículo expone las recomendaciones (con principios y normas específicas) que deben guiar la elaboración de protocolos de atención al final de la vida en urgencias, con el fin de que cada SU pueda elaborar sus propios protocolos.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Terminal Care , Consensus , Death , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans
9.
Emergencias (Sant Vicenç dels Horts) ; 34(1): 47-54, feb. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-203341

ABSTRACT

Los servicios de Urgencias (SU) tienen como objetivo primordial salvar vidas, pero no debemos olvidar que esta misión encomiable no siempre es posible y, cuando se atienden pacientes en la última fase de la vida, existe la obligación ética de dialogar con ellos y sus familiares para conseguir un consenso y limitar o adecuar el manejo clínico de acuerdo a su situación vital. Con este objetivo, los SU deben tener protocolos de cuidados dirigidos a optimizar el confort y control de síntomas de los pacientes en la fase final de la vida, con el fin de evitar sufrimientos innecesarios y preservar su dignidad personal. El presente artículo expone las recomendaciones (con principios y normas específicas) que deben guiar la elaboración de protocolos de atención al final de la vida en urgencias, con el fin de que cada SU pueda elaborar sus propios protocolos.


Emergency services’ main purpose is to save lives, but that worthy mission cannot always be accomplished. When caring for patients toward the end of life, we have an ethical obligation to talk with them and their relatives to obtain consensus on treatment and possibly limit it or adjust management in accordance with the patient’s condition. Emergency department protocols are necessary for optimizing care to provide the greatest possible comfort and control of symptoms in patients at the end of life to prevent unnecessary suffering and preserve dignity. This article sets out recommendations — including the principles and ethical standards that underlie them — so that emergency services can develop end-of-life care protocols for use in their own settings.


Subject(s)
Humans , Health Sciences , Emergency Medical Services/ethics , Terminal Care , Consensus , Death , 35170
10.
Int J Legal Med ; 136(1): 365-372, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34704131

ABSTRACT

The completion of the death certificate is indispensable in Spain for a death to be recorded in the civil registry. Occasionally, doctors may be reluctant to sign a death certificate due to possible legal consequences. This study seeks to analyse the possible judicial consequences doctors may face upon filling out this medico-legal document. Sentences published on the Judicial Power's website between 2009 and 2019 containing the term "death certificate" were analysed. From a total of 2100 sentences examined, only 15 were found to contain the term "death certificate" as part of the claim. In only 7 of these cases the claim was made against the physician, and in 5 the physician was found guilty. Three of them concluded falsity via criminal proceedings, one via administrative proceedings for refusing to sign the certificate and one through civil proceedings for filling out an erroneous antecedent cause of death. In view of the above, it can be inferred that the completion of the death certificate poses few judicial consequences for physicians. In addition, this study reveals the importance of the death certificate document as evidence in judicial proceedings.


Subject(s)
Death Certificates , Physicians , Humans , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
J Med Ethics ; 2021 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330794

ABSTRACT

In March 2021, the Spanish Congress approved the law regulating euthanasia, that regulates both euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS). In this article, we analyse the Spanish law regulating euthanasia and PAS, comparing it with the rest of the European laws on euthanasia and PAS (Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg). Identified strengths of the Spanish law, with respect to other norms, are that it is a law with many safeguards, which broadly recognises professionals' right to conscientious objection and the specification that it makes on the prior comprehensive care of the patient, including the approach to care dependency. Regarding its shortcomings, the law does not differentiate well between euthanasia and PAS; it barely assigns a role to the healthcare team as a whole (similar to other regulations); it does not clarify the functions of the different professionals involved; it does not detail the specific composition and duration of theevaluation commission; it has not been accompanied by a prior or simultaneous regulation of palliative care; and, lastly, the period of time to implement the law is too short.

13.
Palliat Support Care ; 19(2): 257-261, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the psychological well-being of healthcare workers has been taken for granted - it has even been considered a part of the requirements that were demanded of them. When these professionals have experienced suffering and psychological depletion, they have been held accountable for this suffering, adopting an individualistic and reductionist viewpoint focused only on the professional. This approach has become obsolete due to its proven ineffectiveness, especially from an ethics of responsibility and organization viewpoint. CONTEXT: The psychological well-being of the healthcare worker (and its opposites: suffering, exhaustion, and disenchantment) is advantageous to the professional's commitment to the institution, to their work performance, and to their personal life. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to reflect on the psychological suffering of the palliative care professional. METHOD: We will reflect on the three levels of responsibility that influence such suffering (micro-meso-macro-ethical; worker-environment-institution). RESULTS: We will propose a global strategy for the care of psychological well-being supported by scientific evidence and key references. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: We conclude with some contributions on what we have learned and still have to learn on this topic.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing , Palliative Care , Stress, Psychological , Humans
14.
Emergencias (Sant Vicenç dels Horts) ; 33(2): 128-134, abr. 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-215295

ABSTRACT

En el complejo contexto de la atención a la muerte y al duelo, muchos médicos de urgencias deben realizar el certificado médico de defunción (CMD), el último acto médico con el paciente. El médico debe cumplimentar el CMD en aquellos casos que se descarte la muerte judicial. En las urgencias y emergencias médicas es habitual encontrar conflictos y dudas relacionadas con el CMD. Este artículo analiza los principales aspectos éticos y legales relacionados con el CMD en urgencias. Los principios éticos que hay que tener en cuenta ante un conflicto con el CDM son: lealtad con el enfermo, veracidad, no dañar y uso racional de los recursos. Para mejorar la gestión de la atención a la muerte en urgencias, se debe mejorar la formación de los profesionales sobre el CMD con el fin de que conozcan cuándo certificar, cómo hacerlo y sus requisitos legales. (AU)


The last medical act many emergency physicians must do in the context of caring for a dying patient and mourning relatives is to issue a medical death certificate (MDC). The physician is charged with filling in the MDC in cases that do not involve judicial certification. Ethical conflicts and doubts about the cause of death are common when MDCs are issued in emergencies. This paper analyzes the main ethical and legal issues related to MDCs in this setting. The ethical precepts to bear in mind when a conflict or doubt arises are loyalty to the patient, truthfulness, doing no harm, and using public resources wisely. Physician management of processes surrounding death in the emergency department can be improved by providing staff with better training so that they understand how and when to issue a MDC and what legal requirements are involved. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Death Certificates/legislation & jurisprudence , Codes of Ethics , Physicians , Emergency Service, Hospital
15.
Emergencias ; 33(2): 128-134, 2021.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33750054

ABSTRACT

The last medical act many emergency physicians must do in the context of caring for a dying patient and mourning relatives is to issue a medical death certificate (MDC). The physician is charged with filling in the MDC in cases that do not involve judicial certification. Ethical conflicts and doubts about the cause of death are common when MDCs are issued in emergencies. This paper analyzes the main ethical and legal issues related to MDCs in this setting. The ethical precepts to bear in mind when a conflict or doubt arises are loyalty to the patient, truthfulness, doing no harm, and using public resources wisely. Physician management of processes surrounding death in the emergency department can be improved by providing staff with better training so that they understand how and when to issue a MDC and what legal requirements are involved.


En el complejo contexto de la atención a la muerte y al duelo, muchos médicos de urgencias deben realizar el certificado médico de defunción (CMD), el último acto médico con el paciente. El médico debe cumplimentar el CMD en aquellos casos que se descarte la muerte judicial. En las urgencias y emergencias médicas es habitual encontrar conflictos y dudas relacionadas con el CMD. Este artículo analiza los principales aspectos éticos y legales relacionados con el CMD en urgencias. Los principios éticos que hay que tener en cuenta ante un conflicto con el CDM son: lealtad con el enfermo, veracidad, no dañar y uso racional de los recursos. Para mejorar la gestión de la atención a la muerte en urgencias, se debe mejorar la formación de los profesionales sobre el CMD con el fin de que conozcan cuándo certificar, cómo hacerlo y sus requisitos legales.


Subject(s)
Death Certificates , Physicians , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans
16.
Thromb Res ; 202: 31-35, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711756

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abnormal D-dimer concentration measured during anticoagulation therapy (AT) or within one month of discontinuation, is associated with residual pulmonary obstruction (RPO) and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after a first episode of pulmonary embolism (PE). We hypothesized that a significant decrease in D-dimer concentration within the first month of AT in patients with a first episode of PE may predict complete recanalization and a lower risk of recurrent VTE. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients with PE received anticoagulation therapy for three or six months when control computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed. D-dimer levels were measured at admission and at 1-, 3- and/or 6-month follow-ups after the initial event. Clinical, echocardiographic, CTA and analytical data were collected. Predictive factors of RPO and predictive ability of D-dimer concentration at 1- and 6-month follow-ups were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 150 eligible patients, 33 (22%) had RPO in control CTA. Idiopathic PE, a delay of >7 days between symptom onset and diagnosis, and clinical PE severity determined by a s-PESI score ≥ 1 were associated with RPO. D-dimer concentration within a month of AT was significantly higher (823 [558-1259] vs 436 [243-934] ng/ml; p = 0.019) in patients with RPO; decrease (445 [35-1899] vs 912 [476-2858] ng/ml; p = 0.047) and decrease percentage (31.4% vs 76.6%; p < 0.005) in D-dimer concentrations were significantly lower. ROC analysis showed that decrease percentage in D-dimer concentration identified patients with complete recanalization (AUC 0.715, [95% CI, 0.611-0.819], p < 0.005). Decreases of >70% in initial D-dimer at 1-month (OR, 0.56, [95% CI, 0.45-0.70] p = 0.037) and 6-month follow-ups (OR, 0.31 [CI 95%, 0.15-0.66], p = 0.03) were associated with a lower risk of recurrent PE. CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in D-dimer concentration within the first month of AT is associated with complete recanalization and could predict a lower risk of recurrent thrombosis after a first episode of PE.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Venous Thromboembolism , Venous Thrombosis , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy
17.
BMC Med Ethics ; 21(1): 113, 2020 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33198746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Spain, there has been great effort by lawmakers to put Advance Directives (ADs) into practice since 2002. At the same time, the field of bioethics has been on the rise, a discipline that has spurred debate on the right of patients to exercise their autonomy. Despite all this, the implementation of ADs can be said to have failed in Spain, because its prevalence is very low, there is a great lack of knowledge about them and they have very little impact on clinical decisions. The purpose of this article is to analyze and discuss the main reasons for the failure of ADs in Spain. MAIN BODY: The main reasons why ADs have no impact on clinical practice in Spain have been fundamentally four: (1) the training of health professionals about the end of life and AD is lacking; (2) there has been no public process to increase awareness about AD, and therefore people (with the exception of specific highly sensitized groups) know little about them; (3) the bureaucratic procedure to document and implement ADs is excessively complex and cumbersome, creating a significant barrier to their application; (4) in Spain, the remnants of a paternalistic medical culture continue to exist, which causes shared decision-making to be difficult. CONCLUSION: Due to the four reasons mentioned above, AD have not been a useful tool to help honor patients' autonomous decisions about their future care and, therefore, they have not achieved their objective. However, despite the difficulties and problems identified, it has also been observed that health care professionals and the Spanish public have a very positive view of AD. Having identified the problems which have kept AD from being successful, strategies must be developed to help improve their implementation into the future.


Subject(s)
Advance Directives , Health Personnel , Humans , Spain
18.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 20(1): 456, 2020 10 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087061

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An Advanced Care Planning (ACP) program of health decisions is the result of a process of reflection and relationship-building between the patient, their relatives and health professionals. It is based on respect for patients' autonomy, involving them in making decisions about their disease in a way that is shared between the medical team, the patient and their relatives. Up until now, the efficacy of an ACP has not been measured in the existing literature, and therefore it is unknown if these programs reach their goal. The main objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of an ACP program for decision-making in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) in comparison to usual follow up and care. This objective will be evaluated by the Patient Activation Measure test, which measures the participation and self-management of the patient in decision-making. Secondary objectives: to evaluate the effect of the program on quality of life, to know if the patients wishes expressed through the ACP program are fulfilled, to measure the impact of the program on patients' caregivers, to determine the satisfaction of patients included in the program and to evaluate the effect on quality of death. METHODS: Randomized multicentre clinical trial at four hospitals in Madrid. Once they are included in the study, patients' allocation to groups (control vs intervention) will be made by alternative sampling. ACP will be applied to the intervention group, whereas in the Control Group usual follow-up will be carried out in HF units. All patients will fulfil questionnaires and tests related to the objectives of the study again after a 12-month follow-up period in order to gauge the effect of ACP in patients with advanced HF. DISCUSSION: The characteristics of patients with advanced HF make them a model for designing ACP programs, given the high prevalence of this disease, the progressive increase in its incidence and it's clinical characteristics. Until now, the efficacy of this type of program has not been measured, so this Clinical Trial can provide relevant data for future ACP projects. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04424680. Registered 9 June 2020. Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04424680?term=NCT04424680&draw=2&rank=1 .


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Clinical Decision-Making , Heart Failure/therapy , Advance Directives , Decision Making, Shared , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Patient Participation , Patient Satisfaction , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Self-Management , Spain
19.
J Bioeth Inq ; 17(3): 395-405, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32725402

ABSTRACT

Eight focus groups were conducted in four public hospitals in Madrid to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of advance directives (ADs) in order to improve the understanding of their lack of success among physicians and patients. A purposive sample of sixty healthcare professionals discussed ADs and reasons for their infrequent use. Three main themes were identified: perceptions about their meaning, appraisals of their use in clinical practice, and decision-making about them. Healthcare professionals perceived a lack of clarity about their definition and implementation. There is insufficient awareness of their efficacy in improving the quality of clinical relationships and decision-making, and they are often perceived only as a bureaucratic procedure. Advance directives are not integrated in the clinical practice of Madrid's healthcare specialist services because their application is exceedingly complex, because of insufficient education about them (for both professionals and citizens), and because of lack of procedural clarity. Consequently, healthcare professionals are not aware of how ADs could improve clinical decision-making, of when and for whom their use is appropriate, and of who has responsibility for providing ADs-related information to patients. These circumstances contribute to patients' lack of interest in completing these documents and to physicians' sceptical views about their usefulness.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Physicians , Advance Directives , Decision Making , Focus Groups , Health Personnel , Humans
20.
J Med Ethics ; 46(7): 455-458, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32424063

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated an imbalance between the clinical needs of the population and the effective availability of advanced life support (ALS) resources. Triage protocols have thus become necessary. Triage decisions in situations of scarce resources were not extraordinary in the pre-COVID-19 era; these protocols abounded in the context of organ transplantation. However, this prior experience was not considered during the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain. Lacking national guidance or public coordination, each hospital has been forced to put forth independent and autonomous triage protocols, most of which were, nonetheless, based on common ethical principles and clinical criteria. However, controversial, non-clinical criteria have also been defended by Spanish scientific societies and public institutions, including setting an age cut-off value for unilaterally withholding ALS, using 'social utility' criteria, prioritising healthcare professionals or using 'first come, first served' policies. This paper describes the most common triage criteria used in the Spanish context during the COVID-19 epidemic. We will highlight our missed opportunities by comparing these criteria to those used in organ transplantation protocols. The problems posed by subjective, non-clinical criteria will also be discussed. We hope that this critical review might be of use to countries at earlier stages of the epidemic while we learn from our mistakes.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Care Rationing/ethics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Triage/ethics , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Clinical Protocols/standards , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Organ Transplantation/ethics , Organ Transplantation/standards , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...