Interactive signal transfer between host and pathogen during successful infection of barley leaves by Blumeria graminis and Bipolaris sorokiniana.

Using ion-selective microprobes, interactive signalling between barley and Blumeria graminis or Bipolaris sorokiniana has been investigated. The question was raised whether a biotrophically growing fungus manipulates the electrical driving forces (membrane potential, transmembrane pH), required for H+ cotransport of energy-rich compounds. Electrodes were positioned in the substomatal cavity of open stomata or on the leaf surface, and pH was measured continuously up to several days during fungal development. We demonstrate that surface and apoplastic fluids are electrically coupled and respond in a similar manner to stimuli. Apoplastic pH, monitored from the moment of inoculation with conidia, reveals several phases: 2-4h after inoculation of the barley leaf with either fungus, the host displays rapid transient responses after its first contact with the fungal cell wall; apoplastic pH and pCa increases, cytoplasmic pH and pCa decreases. About 1 day after inoculation, the apoplastic pH increases by up to 2 pH units, which is thought to reflect a resistance response against the intruder. Whereas barley leaf cells possess a membrane potential of -152+/-5 mV, hyphae of B. graminis yield -251+/-8 mV, indicative of a substantial driving force advantage for the fungus. Although the resting membrane potential of barley remains constant during the first days after inoculation, leaves infected with B. sorokiniana get confronted with an energy problem, indicated by a retarded repolarization following a "light-off" stimulus. Five days after inoculation, apoplastic pH has increased to 5.97+/-0.47 (n=11) and does no longer respond to "light-off" when measured within lesions. In contrast, it stays at near normal values outside the lesions and responds to "light-off". It is concluded that biotrophically growing fungi do not manipulate the cotransport driving forces since (i) any change in apoplastic pH would be experienced by both partners; (ii) the resting membrane potential is not changed. It is suggested that measured pH changes reflect defence responses of the host against the fungus rather than fungal action to increase compatibility.

Apoplastic pH signaling in barley leaves attacked by the powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei.

To investigate apoplastic responses of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to the barley powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei, noninvasive microprobe techniques were employed. H(+)- and Ca(2+)-selective microprobes were inserted into open stomata of barley leaves inoculated with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei race A6 conidia. Resistance gene-mediated responses of barley genotype Ingrid (susceptible parent line) and the near-isogenic resistant Ingrid backcross lines (I-mlo5, I-Mla12, and I-Mlg) were continuously monitored from 20 min to 4 days after inoculation. The main events were categorized as short-term responses around 2 h after inoculation (hai), intermediate responses around 8 and 12 hai, and long-term responses starting between 21 and 24 hai. Short-term responses were rapid transient decreases of apoplastic H(+)- and Ca2+ activities that lasted minutes only. Kinetics were similar for all genotypes tested, and thus, these short-term responses were attributed as nonspecific first encounters of fungal surface material with the host plasma membrane. This is supported by the observation that a microinjected chitin oligomer (GlcNAc)8 yielded similar apoplastic alkalinization. Intermediate responses are trains of H+ (increase) spikes that, being different in susceptible Ingrid and penetration-resistant I-mlo5 (or I-Mlg), were interpreted as accompanying specific events of papillae formation. Long-term events were massive slow and long-lasting alkalinizations up to two pH units above control. Since these latter changes were only observed with near-isogenic hypersensitive reaction (HR)-mounting genotypes I-Mla12 and I-Mlg but not with I-mlo5 or, to a smaller extent, with susceptible Ingrid, both lacking significant rates of HR, they were rated as cell death specific. It is concluded that apoplastic pH changes are important indicators of host-pathogen interactions that correlate with both the different stages of fungal development and the different types of host defense response.