Chromosomal aberrations in vitro induced by aneugens.

Various aneugens were reported to induce structural chromosomal aberrations beside their influence on cell division and their aneugenic potential To asses, whether a relationship between disturbance of cell division and clastogenic potential exists, CHO cells were treated with the well-known aneugens colcemid, colchicine and vincristine and investigated for the induction of structural chromosomal aberrations, polyploid cells and alterations in mitotic index. At low and intermediate concentration, all compounds induced polyploidy and an increase in mitotic index, but no structural aberrations at all. However, at high concentrations, colcemid and colchicine both induced numerous structural chromosomal aberrations in diploid cells. Colchicine was also clastogenic in tetraploid cells. Vincristine did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in diploid cells, but in tetraploid cells. The clastogenic effects showed a clear-cut threshold with all three compounds. Furthermore, it was found that the tetraploid condition in CHO cells is generally accompanied by an increase in structural chromosomal aberrations, in vehicle controls as well as in cultures treated with the aneugens. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates that for the three aneugenic compounds tested, no direct relationship between compound induced disturbance of cell cycle and compound induced structural chromosomal aberration incidence exists.

Recommendations for the performance of UDS tests in vitro and in vivo.

The Working Group (WG) dealt with the harmonization of routine methodologies of tests for unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) both in vitro and in vivo. In contrast to the existing guidelines from OECD, EPA and EC on in vitro UDS tests (there is no Japanese UDS guideline), the Working Group recommends that in general in vitro UDS tests should be performed with primary hepatocytes. For routine applications any other cell types would need special justification. Hepatocytes from male rats are preferable, unless there are contra-indications on the basis of e.g. toxicokinetic data. According to the OECD, EPA and EC guidelines, UDS may be analysed by means of autoradiography (AR) or liquid scintillation counting (LSC). The WG recommends use of AR. LSC is less suitable due to the problem of differentiation between UDS activity and replicative DNA synthesis, and the disadvantage that cells cannot be analysed individually. Since a specific cell type was recommended by the WG, methodological aspects could be described in more detail than in the present guidelines. For in vitro tests, it was agreed that the initial viability of freshly isolated hepatocytes should be at least 70%. With regard to the need for confirmatory experiments in the event of a clear-cut negative result, the majority view was that confirmation by a second (normally not identical) experiment is still needed; this is in line with the present OECD and EC guidelines. Evaluation of results from UDS tests should be based primarily on net nuclear grain (NNG) values, although it is recognised that nuclear and cytoplasmic grains result from different biological processes. Since grain counts are influenced by a number of methodological parameters, no global threshold NNG value can be recommended for discrimination of positive and negative UDS results. For in vitro assays, the criteria for positive findings go beyond those of the present guidelines and two alternative approaches are given which are based on (1) dose-dependent increases in NNG values and (2) reproducibility, dose-effect relationship and cytotoxicity. At present there is no official guideline on the performance of in vivo UDS tests. Some fundamental recommendations given for in vitro methodology also apply to the in vivo assay. For routine testing with the in vivo UDS test, again the general use of hepatocytes from male rats is recommended. However, concerning the requirement to use one or two sexes, consistency with other in vivo genotoxicity assays (e.g. the micronucleus assay) would be preferable. As for the in vitro methodology, AR is preferred rather than LSC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Inter-laboratory ring trial of in vitro DNA repair tests using rat hepatocytes: further testing and conclusive remarks.

The results of the extension of a collaborative study for the detection of chemical-induced DNA damage in rat hepatocytes in vitro are presented in this report. Three coded compounds, i.e. 1,4-butanediol dimethanesulphonate, hydrazine sulphate and sodium dichromate, were tested for DNA repair synthesis by seven different laboratories, either using autoradiographic procedures or the liquid scintillation counting technique. Inter-laboratory standardization was intentionally not requested in order to investigate the validity of each study design under routine conditions. 1,4-Butanediol dimethanesulphonate was clearly positive in most laboratories; sodium dichromate was generally positive, while the results on hydrazine sulphate were contradictory.

Report of a comparative study of DNA damage and repair assays in primary rat hepatocytes with five coded chemicals.

We report the results of a collaborative study for the detection of chemical-induced DNA damage in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. The methods include the detection of unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) with either autoradiography (5 laboratories) or liquid scintillation counting (2 laboratories) and the assessment of DNA single-strand breaks with the alkaline elution assay (1 laboratory). Interlaboratory standardization was omitted in order to prove the agreement of the assays under routine conditions. Five coded chemicals were tested. For 4 chemicals (2-acetylaminofluorene, thiourea, glycerine and potassium chloride) the UDS data were consistent in all laboratories, thus indicating a high consensus of the test systems applied in the different laboratories. Those 3 chemicals that were not expected to elicit genotoxic activity (thiourea, glycerine, and potassium chloride) yielded negative results in all laboratories. 2-Acetylaminofluorene, a known DNA-damaging agent in hepatocytes, gave strongly positive responses in all laboratories. In contrast, N-nitrosodiphenylamine led to equivocal responses.

In vitro secondary activation (memory effect) of avian vitellogenin II gene in isolated liver nuclei.

The vitellogenin II gene is specifically reactivated in vitro (secondary stimulation, memory effect) in purified liver nuclei that had ceased to express the gene in vivo a month after the roosters had received a single injection of estradiol (primary stimulation). The in vitro reactivation depends on the addition to the nuclei of nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from estradiol-stimulated livers, polyamines (0.1-1.0 mM), and calmodulin (0.1 mM). Under identical incubation conditions the vitellogenin gene could not be reactivated in oviduct, embryonic, and immature chicken liver nuclei. Two other genes, those for ovalbumin and lysozyme, which are regulated by estradiol in the oviduct, could not be activated in the liver nuclei. The correct initiation of vitellogenin gene transcription in the liver nuclei was tested by primer extension studies. Addition of the antiestrogen tamoxifen (0.1 microM) to the system decreased vitellogenin mRNA synthesis by about 45% without affecting total RNA synthesis. Addition of quercetin (0.1 mM) and trans-flupenthixol (0.2 mM), inhibitors of nuclear protein kinase II and calmodulin-dependent kinase, respectively, inhibited the synthesis of vitellogenin mRNA by about 55% without affecting total RNA synthesis. The inhibitory effects of the antiestrogen and the kinase inhibitors were not additive, suggesting that both classes of inhibitor act on the same target or related targets. Depleting the estradiol receptors from the cell and nuclear extracts by means of estradiol-receptor antibodies covalently bound to Matrex beads reduced the stimulation of the vitellogenin gene by 40%. We conclude that in addition to the estradiol receptor and phosphorylation of nuclear protein(s) there are additional factors responsible for the in vitro secondary activation of the avian vitellogenin II gene.