Physical work load and its assessment among the nursing staff in nursing homes.

A study was conducted to investigate the physical work load and the prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints of nurses in nursing homes. Thirty-six female subjects selected from three nursing homes in the Netherlands participated in an observational study. In addition, the total nursing staff (n = 668) was invited to take part in a questionnaire survey (response was 94%). It was noticed that almost 60% of the observed time was spent on nonpatient-related activities. Moreover, activities alternated rapidly and seldom lasted longer than 4 minutes on average. Twenty percent of the observed time was spent in "poor" work postures as defined by the Ovako Working Posture Analyzing System (Action Category 2 to 4). Activities contributing most to these poor work postures were patient care and household and preliminary tasks. Perceived exertion as scored on the Borg-CR10 scale was highest during patient-related activities. This holds also for a relative increase of heart rate. Questionnaire results showed prevalences of 41%, 35%, and 20% respectively, for back, arm/neck, and leg complaints. From this study it can be concluded that not only patient-related activities should be taken into consideration for the improvement of work postures and other potential strenuous aspects of nursing work. Household and preliminary tasks, ergonomic layout of the ward, and work pressure also deserve attention.

The quest for interaction: studies on combined exposure.

A literature review was performed on the subject of combined exposure to stressors in the working situation. A general, dynamic model of workload served as the theoretical framework for the study. In this model, every factor that triggers a physiological or psychological response in the worker is regarded as a stressor. Decision latitude plays an important role in the model. A quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed on the available literature. It was concluded that the stressors that appear in studies on combined exposure stem mostly from the physical, chemical and biological environment. The task contents, the labor conditions, social relationships at work and the decision latitude are considerably less often studied in relation to combined exposure. It is concluded that important concepts in the study of combined exposure (e.g. interaction, independence, synergism, antagonism) are often quite carelessly mentioned in the literature. Explicit definition of these concepts is lacking in many publications. Establishment of maximum exposure levels is not yet possible for most stressor combinations. Examples are given of combinations that do allow more or less definite conclusions. It is recommended that more studies should be interdisciplinary organized. More studies are necessary in the field, studying effects of long exposure periods in the working population instead of studying students in laboratory situations. Exposure of susceptible groups, such as older workers and partially disabled workers, deserves special attention.