Oocyte retrieval in social fertility preservation: challenging traditional beliefs on gonadotropin dosing and follicular size.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate treatment approaches for fertility preservation patients, with a focus on timing of oocyte retrieval, and to determine whether their characteristics differ from those of other IVF patients. Additionally, to evaluate the significance of follicle size on triggering day in the context of fertility preservation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center. It compared 140 matched patients undergoing social fertility preservation to 140 patients undergoing IVF treatment due to male factor infertility. RESULTS: Patients undergoing fertility preservation received a higher initial gonadotropin dose and had more oocytes retrieved than the control group. Within the fertility preservation cohort, a negative correlation was observed between the rate of large follicles and the number of retrieved oocytes. While there was no significant association between rate of large follicles and oocyte maturation rate in the entire group, age-stratified analysis revealed a negative relationship. Analysis revealed that although traditional treatment determinants such as follicular size and gonadotropin dosing were considered, peak estradiol levels were consistently identified as significant predictors of treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians may modify treatments for fertility preservation, emphasizing a higher gonadotropin dosage to maximize oocyte retrieval. Elevated estradiol levels can serve as a real-time predictive marker for the number of mature oocytes. While treatment strategies can influence outcomes, intrinsic patient factors, particularly baseline ovarian function, remain crucial. These results challenge beliefs regarding the importance of larger follicles and suggest the need for a tailored approach, considering patient age and specific fertility preservation objectives.

High physical activity and ovarian reserve: a prospective study of normo-ovulatory professional athletes.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether high physical activity affects ovarian reserve in normo-ovulatory, reproductive-age women. METHODS: This prospective, observational study compared 31 professional female athletes, with 31 women who did not engage in physical activity. It was conducted 2017-2020 in a tertiary medical center. Normo-ovulatory, professional athletes, ages 20-35 years were recruited from The Wingate Institute-the Israeli National Institute for Sport Excellence. They had high International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scores. Non-physically active women, matched by age and body mass index, were recruited from hospital staff. Women were evaluated for ovarian reserve markers on day 2-5 of the menstrual cycle, including follicular stimulating hormone, antral follicle count, anti-Mullerian hormone and Inhibin B. RESULTS: The average age of the high physical activity group was 29.9 ± 4.2 years and the nonactive group 31.6 ± 4.2 years (p = 0.062). Body mass index of both groups were similar (22.5 ± 5.0 vs. 21.4 ± 2.5, respectively; p = 0.1). No differences were observed with respect to follicle stimulating hormone (p = 0.12) and anti-Mullerian hormone (p = 0.16). A trend towards higher total antral follicle count in the high physical activity group vs. the non-active group (34.5 ± 12.9 vs. 28.1 ± 15.2, p = 0.08) and lower Inhibin B (68.1 ± 36.8 vs. 89.4 ± 46.1, p = 0.05). Menarche age correlated with anti-Mullerian hormone (r = 0.387, p = 0.003), as did total antral follicle count (r = 0.368, p = 0.004). IPAQ scores and basal follicle stimulating hormone levels were negatively correlated (r = - 0.292, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Athletic, normo-ovulatory women have ovarian reserves that are at least as good as those of the general population. As this is the first study examining this issue, it could cautiously reassure women engaged in high physical activity regarding ovarian reserve.

How effective is digital educational content in shaping fertility awareness? An interventional, cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether exposure to digital educational content affects fertility awareness and attitudes towards fertility preservation treatments? METHODS: A total of 957 women ages 20 to 45 years participated in this internet-based, interventional, cross-sectional study. A questionnaire assessing knowledge of the reproductive span and attitudes towards fertility preservation treatment was completed by these women before and after exposure to online educational content on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation treatments. Responses before and after exposure to the educational content were compared. RESULTS: Knowledge about female age-related fertility decline improved significantly after exposure to educational content (51.6% vs. 79.6%, p < 0.001). Increased willingness to pursue fertility preservation treatments (38.6% vs. 42.9%, p < 0.001) and to recommend fertility preservation treatments to friends (55% vs. 65.2%, p < 0.001) was observed. Participants who desired to conceive were more positively influenced by the exposure to educational content in their attitudes towards fertility treatments compared to those who do not desire to conceive. CONCLUSIONS: Online educational content has the potential to improve fertility awareness and shape a more positive attitude towards fertility preservation treatments for the public.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Versus Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Triggering in Fertility Preservation Cycles.

The purpose of this research is to study the efficacy of GnRH-a versus r-hCG triggering in patients who go through fertility preservation cycles. This retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. It includes 191 patients undergoing fertility preservation cycles between May 2013 and September 2018, in which ovulation was induced by either GnRH-a or r-hCG. Main outcome measures were number and rate of mature oocyte. Among treatment cycles with medical indication, GnRH agonist significantly increases the odds for high mature rate by 3.55 (1.30-9.66), while in treatment cycles with social indication, there is no significant effect of the triggering agent. An advantage for GnRH-a triggering was observed in medically indicated preservation cycles.

Does stress affect IVF outcomes? A prospective study of physiological and psychological stress in women undergoing IVF.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the effects of physiological and psychological stress on fertility outcomes for women undergoing IVF? DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 72 patients undergoing IVF in 2017 and 2018. Physiological stress was assessed by salivary cortisol measurements: (i) pretreatment, when the patient received the IVF protocol; (ii) before oocyte retrieval (follicular cortisol was also measured); and (iii) before embryo transfer. Emotional stress was evaluated at each assessment with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and a 1-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, referred to as the 'Stress Scale'. Correlations between cortisol concentrations, psychological stress and IVF outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Salivary cortisol concentrations increased by 28% from pretreatment phase (0.46 ± 0.28 µg/dl) to maximum concentration on oocyte retrieval day (0.59 ± 0.29 µg/dl, P = 0.029) and then decreased by 29% on embryo transfer day (0.42 ± 0.23 µg/dl, P = 0.0162). On embryo transfer day, cortisol among women in their first cycle was higher than women who underwent more than one treatment (P = 0.024). Stress Scale score increased by 39% from pretreatment to a maximum score on oocyte retrieval day and then decreased by 12% on embryo transfer day. Salivary cortisol and Stress Scale were not related to subsequent embryo transfer, fertilization rate, embryo quality or clinical pregnancy rate. Follicular cortisol concentration was positively correlated with fertilization rate (r = 0.4, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: It can be cautiously concluded that physiological and psychological stress do not negatively affect IVF outcomes. Moreover, high follicular cortisol concentrations might have positive effects on pregnancy rates.

Adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery: is there a personal impact?

PURPOSE: The rise in the rate of cesarean deliveries highlights complications related to adhesion formation. This study evaluated whether the incidence and severity of adhesions secondary to repeat cesarean deliveries are a consequence of repeated surgeries or due to an individual's propensity to develop adhesions. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 160 patients who had more than two repeat cesarean deliveries in a single teaching hospital. Data regarding intra-abdominal adhesions were collected. The severity, location, density and amount of adhesions were evaluated based on standard operative reports. Adhesion progression in subsequent cesarean deliveries was evaluated for each individual patient. RESULTS: 69/160 (43 %) patients developed significant adhesions following the primary cesarean delivery. Of these, 46 (67 %) had significant adhesions at the second surgery. Of the 91 (57 %) patients, who did not develop significant adhesions after the primary cesarean delivery, 34 (37 %) had significant adhesions at the third surgery. A patient presenting with significant adhesions at her second cesarean had a 1.88-fold risk for significant adhesions at her third cesarean (95 % CI 1.3-2.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adhesion development might be influenced by individual factors more than by the number of cesarean deliveries.