Multi-elemental consumer-driven nutrient cycling when predators feed on different prey.

Predators play a fundamental role in cycling nutrients through ecosystems, by altering the amount and compositions of waste products and uneaten prey parts available to decomposers. Different prey can vary in their elemental content and the deposition of elements in predator waste can vary depending on which elements are preferentially retained versus eliminated as waste products. We tested how feeding on different prey (caterpillars, cockroaches, crickets, and flies) affected the concentrations of 23 elements in excreta deposited by wolf spider across 2 seasons (spring versus fall). Spider excreta had lower concentrations of carbon and higher concentrations of many other elements (Al, B, Ba, K, Li, P, S, Si, and Sr) compared to prey remains and whole prey carcasses. In addition, elemental concentrations in unconsumed whole prey carcasses and prey remains varied between prey species, while spider excreta had the lowest variation among prey species. Finally, the concentrations of elements deposited differed between seasons, with wolf spiders excreting greater concentrations of Fe, Mg, Mn, Mo, S, and V in the fall. However, in the spring, spiders excreted higher concentrations of Al, B, Ba, Ca, Cd, Cu, K, P, Na, Si, Sr, and Zn. These results highlight that prey identity and environmental variation can determine the role that predators play in regulating the cycling of many elements. A better understanding of these convoluted nutritional interactions is critical to disentangle specific consumer-driven effects on ecosystem function.

Variation among arthropod taxa in the amino acid content of exoskeleton and digestible tissue.

Arthropod consumption provides amino acids to invertebrates and vertebrates alike, but not all amino acids in arthropods may be digestible as some are bound in the exoskeleton. Consumers may not be able to digest exoskeleton in significant amounts or avoid it entirely (e.g., extraoral digestion). Hence, measures that do not separate digestible amino acids from those in exoskeleton may not accurately represent the amino acids available to consumers. Additionally, arthropods are taxonomically diverse, and it remains unclear if taxonomic differences also reflect differences in amino acid availability. Thus, we tested: (1) if there were consistent differences in the content and balance of amino acids between the digestible tissue and exoskeleton of arthropods and (2) if arthropod Orders differ in amino acid content and balance. We measured the amino acid content (mg/100 mg dry mass) and balance (mg/100 mg protein) of whole bodies and exoskeleton of a variety of arthropods using acid hydrolysis. Overall, there was higher amino acid content in digestible tissue. There were also significant differences in the amino acid balance of proteins in digestible tissue and exoskeleton. Amino acid content and balance also varied among Orders; digestible tissues of Hemiptera contained more of some essential amino acids than other Orders. These results demonstrate that arthropod taxa vary in amino acid content, which could have implications for prey choice by insectivores. In addition, exoskeleton and digestible tissue content differ in arthropods, which means that whole body amino acid content of an arthropod is not necessarily a predictor of amino acid intake of a predator that feeds on that arthropod.