Novel Use of Diaphyseal Fibular Autograft for Revision Arthrodesis in Failed Keller Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

This case report describes a unique solution to the complex problem of bone loss and first-ray instability after a failed Keller arthroplasty. The patient was a 65-year-old woman who presented 5 years after undergoing Keller arthroplasty of the left first metatarsophalangeal joint for hallux rigidus with a chief complaint of pain and inability to wear regular shoes. The patient underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with diaphyseal fibula used as structural autograft. The patient has been followed for 5 years and has full resolution of previous symptoms without complications using this previously undescribed autograft harvest site.

Is There Unconscious Bias in the Orthopaedic Residency Interview Selection Process?

OBJECTIVE: Orthopaedic surgery has historically been a white male-dominated field. Given the diverse patient population presenting to providers with musculoskeletal pathology, it is thought that it would be beneficial for the orthopaedic workforce to more closely mirror this patient population. This study aims to elucidate whether unconscious bias may have an effect on the scoring of applications for residency interview selection. DESIGN: Applications for the 2019-2020 residency match cycle were initially reviewed and scored by faculty members. Applications were then redacted of all information suggestive of race or gender and returned to evaluators for rescoring after at least 6 months. The pre and post-redaction data was compared using ANOVA and student's two-tailed t tests. SETTING: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen attending surgeons scored 320 2019-2020 Electronic Residency Application System (ERAS) applications, unblinded and blinded of applicant identifying information. RESULTS: Interviewed applicants were similar to the non-interviewed group in all measured variables except for higher pre-redaction scores (8.73-7.81; p = 0.02) which was expected (Table 2). Minority applicants had significant differences in Step 1 scores (243 vs 247; p < 0.01), Step 2 scores (251 vs 254; p = 0.01), articles (5.9 vs 3.8; p < 0.01), posters (5.9 vs 3.5; p < 0.01), and pre-redaction scores (7.44 vs 8.07; p = 0.01) compared to white applicants (Table 4). There was no relationship noted between step score and number or type of research items (Table 5). Pre-redaction and post-redaction scores were significantly different in white applicants who experienced a negative change (8.07-7.88; p = 0.03 (Table 6)). Males had statistically significant differences compared to females in Step 1 score (246 vs 243; p = 0.01) (Table 7). CONCLUSIONS: This study was unable to prove unconscious bias based on a lack of statistically significant change of score when blinded, however the direction in change of scores was unlikely to be accounted for exclusively by objective differences between applicants, suggesting a trend toward unconscious bias. It remains unclear how influential subjective portions of the ERAS application such as personal statements, Letters of Recommendation, hobbies, and activities are on the overall assessment of an applicant and whether or not unconscious bias manifests in these subjective portions. Further investigation is needed in this area. Until then, residency programs should take immediate measures to mitigate potential implicit bias in the residency interview selection process. Actions can include implicit bias training for all faculty members involved in resident selection, standardization of application scoring and possibly redacting all or portions of the ERAS application so that only objective academic markers are presented to evaluators. Gaining a better understanding of these barriers is not only essential for their removal, but also allows for better preparation of applicants for success in the match with the ultimate goal being to correct the persistent disparity in the field of orthopaedic surgery.

Utility of Allograft Talus as a Source for Grafting of Concurrent Humeral and Glenoid Defects Associated With Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: An Anthropometric Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare morphologic data of the talus using magnetic resonance images with previously reported values of the humeral head and the glenoid as a potential graft source for both the humeral head as well as glenoid reconstruction in the setting of concomitant glenoid and humeral head defects. METHODS: All magnetic resonance images of the ankle were reviewed for assessment of the morphology and variation of the talus among individuals. Patients with post-traumatic, osteoarthritic, or surgical changes to the distal tibia about the mid- or hind- foot, or patients with incomplete medical records were excluded. Radiographic parameters that were measured included the maximum vertical height (MVH), the height to the talar neck, the radius of curvature (ROC) of the talar dome, ROC of the subtalar joint, and the maximum medial-to-lateral width of the talar dome. Demographic data also were collected on each individual. Statistical analysis was performed via a linear regression model with backwards elimination to determine which demographic data correlated most strongly with talar anthropometric values. RESULTS: A total of 82 study patients met inclusion criteria (59 male, 23 female; mean age 40.91 ± 14.69 years). Sex was found have a positive correlation of the following talar dimensions: MVH (P = .039), talar dome ROC (P < .001), and subtalar joint ROC (p = 0.001). Height was the most positive correlation for medial-to-lateral width (P < .001), height to the talar neck (P = .004), and also correlate for MVH (P = .004). Body mass index was found to have multicollinearity and was therefore not used as a variable. CONCLUSIONS: Allograft talus appears to be a viable graft, as demonstrated in this anthropometric study for both reconstruction of the glenoid and humeral head when cases of bipolar glenohumeral bone loss are present. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study aims to further evaluate potential allograft donor sites for bipolar lesions.

From Lateral Ankle Sprain to Above-Knee Amputation: A Unique Case Report of Group A Streptococcus Necrotizing Soft-tissue Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Necrotizing fasciitis, also referred to necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI), is an infrequent entity that results in orthopedic consultation. It is a rapidly spreading typically associated with a contaminated wound that spreads rapidly along fascial planes resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. However, it is a rare occurrence that such pathology occurs in an atraumatic fashion, which is without a wound through the skin. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old female with no significant medical history presented to a walk-in orthopedic clinic with increasing ankle pain after a lateral ankle sprain 2 days prior. Patient denies any fevers, chills, shortness of breath, numbness, tingling, paresthesia, or any additional trauma since the initial ankle sprain. The patient was afebrile, maintaining oxygenation, normotensive, but tachycardic to just over 100. Physical examination was only significant for moderate swelling and ecchymosis about the lateral malleolus. X-rays and venous ultrasound were negative for any associated pathology. After a period of observation, the patient acutely decompensated with a significant increase in pain in the lower leg on passive stretch, an increase in compartment firmness and a worsening tachycardia up to the 120's. The patient was taken emergently for fasciotomies for presumed compartment syndrome. The patient was hemodynamically unstable during the case and transferred to the intensive care unit where she continued to decompensate, requiring multiple vasopressors. The affected extremity became necrotic at the level of the foot and her hemodynamic instability continued, causing a return to the operating room for an emergent guillotine above-knee amputation. The patient progressively stabilized and underwent a formal above-knee amputation 2 days later. Cultures obtained during the second case were positive for Group A Streptococcus. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the variable presentation of NSTIs as well as has having a high index of suspicion to ensure this highly morbid and fatal disease process is diagnosed expeditiously. This case is also unique in that it developed without any obvious wounds and that monomicrobial Group A Streptococcus was the culprit, while most NSTIs are polymicrobial.