Impact of magnetic resonance-guided versus conventional radiotherapy workflows on organ at risk doses in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lymph node oligometastases.

Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance (MR)-linac delivery is expected to improve organ at risk (OAR) sparing. In this study, OAR doses were compared for online adaptive MR-linac treatments and conventional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-linac radiotherapy, taking into account differences in clinical workflows, especially longer session times for MR-linac delivery. Materials and methods: For 25 patients with pelvic/abdominal lymph node oligometastases, OAR doses were calculated for clinical pre-treatment and daily optimized 1.5 T MR-linac treatment plans (5 × 7 Gy) and compared with simulated CBCT-linac plans for the pre-treatment and online anatomical situation. Bowelbag and duodenum were re-contoured on MR-imaging acquired before, during and after each treatment session. OAR hard constraint violations, D0.5cc and D10cc values were evaluated, focusing on bowelbag and duodenum. Results: Overall, hard constraints for all OAR were violated less often in daily online MR-linac treatment plans compared with CBCT-linac: in 5% versus 22% of fractions, respectively. D0.5cc and D10cc values did not differ significantly. When taking treatment duration and intrafraction motion into account, estimated delivered doses to bowelbag and duodenum were lower with CBCT-linac if identical planning target volume (PTV) margins were used for both modalities. When reduced PTV margins were achievable with MR-linac treatment, bowelbag doses were lower compared with CBCT-linac. Conclusions: Compared with CBCT-linac treatments, the online adaptive MR-linac approach resulted in fewer hard planning constraint violations compared with single-plan CBCT-linac delivery. With respect to other bowelbag/duodenum dose-volume parameters, the longer duration of MR-linac treatment sessions negatively impacts the potential dosimetric benefit of daily adaptive treatment planning.

Adaptive magnetic resonance-guided neurovascular-sparing radiotherapy for preservation of erectile function in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Erectile dysfunction is a common adverse effect of external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa), likely as a result of damage to neural and vascular tissue. Magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT) enables high-resolution MR imaging and paves the way for neurovascular-sparing approaches, potentially lowering erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for PCa. The aim of this study was to assess the planning feasibility of neurovascular-sparing MRgRT for localized PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive localized PCa patients, treated with standard 5×7.25 Gy MRgRT, were included. For these patients, neurovascular-sparing 5×7.25 Gy MRgRT plans were generated. Dose constraints for the neurovascular bundle (NVB), the internal pudendal artery (IPA), the corpus cavernosum (CC), and the penile bulb (PB) were established. Doses to regions of interest were compared between the neurovascular-sparing plans and the standard clinical pre-treatment plans. RESULTS: Neurovascular-sparing constraints for the CC, and PB were met in all 20 patients. For the IPA, constraints were met in 19 (95%) patients bilaterally and 1 (5%) patient unilaterally. Constraints for the NVB were met in 8 (40%) patients bilaterally, in 8 (40%) patients unilaterally, and were not met in 4 (20%) patients. NVB constraints were not met when gross tumor volume (GTV) was located dorsolaterally in the prostate. Dose to the NVB, IPA, and CC was significantly lower in the neurovascular-sparing plans. CONCLUSIONS: Neurovascular-sparing MRgRT for localized PCa is feasible in the planning setting. The extent of NVB sparing largely depends on the patient's GTV location in relation to the NVB.

Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionation for SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac.

PURPOSE: At our department, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using the 1.5T MR-linac system (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) has been initiated for patients with lymph node oligometastases. Superior soft tissue contrast and the possibility for online plan adaptation on the Unity may allow for hypofractionated treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric feasibility and compare the plan quality of different hypofractionated schemes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data was used from 12 patients with single lymph node oligometastases (10 pelvic, 2 para-aortic), which were all treated on the Unity with a prescribed dose of 5x7 Gy to 95% of the PTV. Hypofractionation was investigated for 3x10 Gy and 1x20 Gy schemes (all 60 Gy BED α/ß = 10). The pre-treatment plans were evaluated based on dose criteria and plan quality. If all criteria were met, the number of online adapted plans which also met all dose criteria was investigated. For pre-treatment plans meeting the criteria for all three fractionation schemes, the plan quality after online adaptation was compared using the four parameters described in the NRG-BR001 phase 1 trial. RESULTS: Pre-treatment plans met all clinical criteria for the three different fractionation schemes in 10, 9 and 6 cases. 50/50, 45/45 17/30 of the corresponding online adapted plans met all criteria, respectively. Violations were primarily caused by surrounding organs at risk overlapping or adjacent to the PTV. The 1x20 Gy treatment plans were, in general, of lesser quality than the 5x7 Gy and 3x10 Gy plans. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated radiotherapy for lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac is feasible based on dose criteria and plan quality metrics. The location of the target relative to critical structures should be considered in choosing the most suitable fractionation scheme. Especially for single fraction treatment, meeting all dose criteria in the pre-treatment situation does not guarantee that this also applies during online treatment.

Target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the first clinical 1.5T MR-linac SBRT treatments of lymph node oligometastases compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients were treated at our institute for single and multiple lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac since August 2018. The superior soft-tissue contrast and additional software features of the MR-linac compared to CBCT-linacs allow for online adaptive treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to perform a target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the clinically delivered online adaptive radiotherapy treatment compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient data was used from 14 patients with single lymph node oligometastases and 6 patients with multiple (2-3) metastases. All patients were treated on the 1.5T MR-linac with a prescribed dose of 5 × 7 Gy to 95% of the PTV and a CBCT-linac plan was created for each patient. The difference in target coverage between these plans was compared and plans were evaluated based on dose criteria for each fraction after calculating the CBCT-plan on the daily anatomy. The GTV coverage was evaluated based on the online planning and the post-delivery MRI. RESULTS: For both single and multiple lymph node oligometastases the GTV V35Gy had a median value of 100% for both the MR-linac plans and CBCT-plans pre- and post-delivery and did not significantly differ. The percentage of plans that met all dose constraints was improved from 19% to 84% and 20% to 67% for single and multiple lymph node cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the first clinical 1.5T MR-linac SBRT treatments of lymph node oligometastases compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment shows a smaller amount of unplanned violations of high dose criteria. The GTV coverage was comparable. Benefit is primarily gained in patients treated for multiple lymph node oligometastases: geometrical deformations are accounted for, dose can be delivered in one plan and margins can be reduced.

Delivered dose quantification in prostate radiotherapy using online 3D cine imaging and treatment log files on a combined 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Monitoring the intrafraction motion and its impact on the planned dose distribution is of crucial importance in radiotherapy. In this work we quantify the delivered dose for the first prostate patients treated on a combined 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and linear accelerator system in our clinic based on online 3D cine-MR and treatment log files. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prostate intrafraction motion trace was obtained with a soft-tissue based rigid registration method with six degrees of freedom from 3D cine-MR dynamics with a temporal resolution of 8.5-16.9 s. For each fraction, all dynamics were also registered to the daily MR image used during the online treatment planning, enabling the mapping to this reference point. Moreover, each fraction's treatment log file was used to extract the timestamped machine parameters during delivery and assign it to the appropriate dynamic volume. These partial plans to dynamic volume combinations were calculated and summed to yield the delivered fraction dose. The planned and delivered dose distributions were compared among all patients for a total of 100 fractions. RESULTS: The clinical target volume underwent on average a decrease of 2.2% ± 2.9% in terms of D99% coverage while bladder V62Gy was increased by 1.6% ± 2.3% and rectum V62Gy decreased by 0.2% ± 2.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The first MR-linac dose reconstruction results based on prostate tracking from intrafraction 3D cine-MR and treatment log files are presented. Such a pipeline is essential for online adaptation especially as we progress to MRI-guided extremely hypofractionated treatments.

Focal salvage treatment for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: A magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (FS-HDR-BT) is one of the treatment options for radiorecurrent localized prostate cancer. However, due to the invasive nature of the treatment, not all patients are eligible. Magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac) systems open up new treatment possibilities and could potentially replace FS-HDR-BT treatment. We conducted a planning study to investigate the feasibility of delivering a single 19 Gy dose to the recurrent lesion using a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent FS-HDR-BT were included. The clinical target volume (CTV) encompassed the visible lesion plus a 5 mm margin. Treatment plans were created for a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac system using a 1 mm planning target volume (PTV) margin. A dose of 19 Gy was prescribed to ≥ 95% of the PTV. In case this target could not be reached, i.e. when organs-at-risk (OAR) constraints were violated, a dose of ≥ 17 Gy to ≥ 90% of the PTV was accepted. MR-Linac plans were compared to clinical FS-HDR-BT plans. RESULTS: Target dose coverage was achieved in 14/30 (47%) FS-HDR-BT plans and 17/30 (57%) MR-Linac plans, with comparable median D95% and D90%. In FS-HDR-BT plans, a larger volume reached ≥ 150% of the prescribed dose. Urethra D10%, rectum D1cm3, and rectum D2cm3 were lower in the FS-HDR-BT plans, while bladder dose was comparable for both modalities. CONCLUSION: Single fraction treatment of recurrent prostate cancer lesions may be feasible using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on a MR-Linac system.

Individual lymph nodes: "See it and Zap it".

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy systems such as the 1.5T MR-linac the daily anatomy can be visualized before, during and after radiation delivery. With these treatment systems, seeing metastatic nodes with MRI and zapping them with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) comes into reach. The purpose of this study is to investigate different online treatment planning strategies and to determine the planning target volume (PTV) margin needed for adequate target coverage when treating lymph node oligometastases with SBRT on the 1.5T MR-linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients were treated for single pelvic or para-aortic lymph node metastases on the 1.5T MR-linac with a prescribed dose of 5x7Gy with a 3 mm isotropic GTV- PTV margin. Based on the daily MRI and actual contours, a completely new treatment plan was generated for each session (adapt to shape, ATS). These were compared with plans optimized on pre-treatment CT contours after correcting for the online target position (adapt to position, ATP). At the end of each treatment session, a post-radiation delivery MRI was acquired on which the GTV was delineated to evaluate the GTV coverage and PTV margins. RESULTS: The median PTV V35Gy was 99.9% [90.7-100%] for the clinically delivered ATS plans compared to 93.6% [76.3-99.7%] when using ATP. The median GTV V35Gy during radiotherapy delivery was 100% [98-100%] on the online planning and post-delivery MRIs for ATS and 100% [93.9-100%] for ATP, respectively. The applied 3 mm isotropic PTV margin is considered adequate. CONCLUSION: For pelvic and para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes, online MRI-guided adaptive treatment planning results in adequate PTV and GTV coverage when taking the actual patient anatomy into account (ATS). Generally, GTV coverage remained adequate throughout the treatment session for both adaptive planning strategies. "Seeing and zapping" metastatic lymph nodes comes within reach for MRI-guided SBRT.

Adaptive radiotherapy: The Elekta Unity MR-linac concept.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The promise of the MR-linac is that one can visualize all anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy and hence adapt the treatment plan in order to always have the optimal treatment. Yet, there is a trade-off to be made between the time spent for adapting the treatment plan against the dosimetric gain. In this work, the various daily plan adaptation methods will be presented and applied on a variety of tumour sites. The aim is to provide an insight in the behavior of the state-of-the-art 1.5 T MRI guided on-line adaptive radiotherapy methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To explore the different available plan adaptation workflows and methods, we have simulated online plan adaptation for five cases with varying levels of inter-fraction motion, regions of interest and target sizes: prostate, rectum, esophagus and lymph node oligometastases (single and multiple target). The plans were evaluated based on the clinical dose constraints and the optimization time was measured. RESULTS: The time needed for plan adaptation ranged between 17 and 485 s. More advanced plan adaptation methods generally resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria. Violations were often caused by insufficient PTV coverage or, for the multiple lymph node case, a too high dose to OAR in the vicinity of the PTV. With full online replanning it was possible to create plans that met all clinical dose constraints for all cases. CONCLUSION: Daily full online replanning is the most robust adaptive planning method for Unity. It is feasible for specific sites in clinically acceptable times. Faster methods are available, but before applying these, the specific use cases should be explored dosimetrically.

Planning feasibility of extremely hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided linear accelerator.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients have been treated in a multicenter phase II trial with extremely hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy (hypo-FLAME trial). The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided linear accelerator (MRI-linac) could achieve complex dose distributions of a quality similar to conventional linac state-of-the-art prostate treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinically delivered treatment plans of 20 hypo-FLAME patients (volumetric modulated arc therapy, 10 MV, 5 mm leaf width) were included. Prescribed dose to the prostate was 5 × 7 Gy, with a focal tumor boost up to 5 × 10 Gy. MRI-linac treatment plans (intensity modulated radiotherapy, 7 MV, 7 mm leaf width, fixed collimator angle and 1.5 T magnetic field) were calculated. Dose distributions were compared. RESULTS: In both conventional and MRI-linac treatment plans, the V35Gy to the whole prostate was >99% in all patients. Mean dose to the gross tumor volume was 45 Gy for conventional and 44 Gy for MRI-linac plans, respectively. Organ at risk doses were met in the majority of plans, except for a rectal V35Gy constraint, which was exceeded in one patient, by 1 cc, for both modalities. The bladder V32Gy and V28Gy constraints were exceeded in two and one patient respectively, for both modalities. CONCLUSION: Planning of stereotactic radiotherapy with focal ablative boosting in prostate cancer on a high field MRI-linac is feasible with the current MRI-linac properties, without deterioration of plan quality compared to conventional treatments.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy Followed by Surgical Stabilization Within 24 h for Unstable Spinal Metastases; A Stage I/IIa Study According to the IDEAL Framework.

Background: Routine treatment for unstable spinal metastases consists of surgical stabilization followed by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after a minimum of 1-2 weeks to allow for initial wound healing. Although routine treatment, there are several downsides. First, radiotherapy induced pain relief is delayed by the time interval required for wound healing. Second, EBRT often requires multiple hospital visits and only 60% of the patients experience pain relief. Third, spinal implants cause imaging artifacts hindering SBRT treatment planning and delivery. Reversing the order of surgery and radiotherapy, with dose sparing of the surgical area by SBRT, could overcome these disadvantages and by eliminating the interval between the two treatments, recovery, and palliation may occur earlier. Design: The safety of SBRT followed by surgical stabilization within 24 h for the treatment of unstable spinal metastases was investigated. Safety was evaluated using the Common-Toxicity-Criteria-Adverse-Events-4.0, with the occurrence of wound complications within 90-days being the primary concern. Results: Between June-2015 and January-2017, 13 patients underwent SBRT followed by surgical stabilization for unstable spinal metastases. The median time between SBRT and surgery was 17-h (IQR 5-19). None of the patients experienced wound complications. Improvements in pain and quality of life were observed over time for all patients. Conclusion: SBRT followed by surgical stabilization within 24 h for the treatment of unstable spinal metastases is safe. Palliation may be experienced earlier and with both treatments being performed in one hospital admission the treatment burden decreases.

Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design.

BACKGROUND: Standard radiotherapy is the treatment of first choice in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases, but is only moderately effective. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used to treat spinal metastases, without randomized evidence of superiority over standard radiotherapy. The VERTICAL study aims to quantify the effect of stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with metastatic spinal disease. METHODS/DESIGN: This study follows the 'cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial' design. The VERTICAL study is conducted within the PRESENT cohort. In PRESENT, all patients with bone metastases referred for radiation therapy are enrolled. For each patient, clinical and patient-reported outcomes are captured at baseline and at regular intervals during follow-up. In addition, patients give informed consent to be offered experimental interventions. Within PRESENT, 110 patients are identified as a sub cohort of eligible patients (i.e. patients with unirradiated painful, mechanically stable spinal metastases who are able to undergo stereotactic radiation therapy). After a protocol amendment, also patients with non-spinal bony metastases are eligible. From the sub cohort, a random selection of patients is offered stereotactic radiation therapy (n = 55), which patients may accept or refuse. Only patients accepting stereotactic radiation therapy sign informed consent for the VERTICAL trial. Non-selected patients (n = 55) receive standard radiotherapy, and are not aware of them serving as controls. Primary endpoint is pain response after three months. Data will be analyzed by intention to treat, complemented by instrumental variable analysis in case of substantial refusal of the stereotactic radiation therapy in the intervention arm. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to quantify the treatment response after (stereotactic) radiation therapy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. This is the first randomized study in palliative care following the cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial design. This design addresses common difficulties associated with classic pragmatic randomized controlled trials, such as disappointment bias in patients allocated to the control arm, slow recruitment, and poor generalizability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands Trials Register number NL49316.041.14. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02364115 . Date of trial registration February 1, 2015.

Sparing the posterior surgical site when planning radiation therapy for thoracic metastatic spinal disease.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Most patients with painful spinal metastases are sufficiently palliated by hypofractionated radiotherapy. However, a small group of patients will need surgical intervention to treat symptomatic spinal cord compression and/or gross mechanical instability. Irradiation of a (prospective) surgical area may lead to postsurgery complications, including wound dehiscence, infection, and chronic wound ulcers. Decreasing the radiation dose to the surgical area could reduce radiation-induced toxicity and associated surgical complications. PURPOSE: To investigate an alternative radiation technique designed to lower the surgical area dose while delivering an adequate target dose and minimal off-target dose. STUDY DESIGN: Comparison of radiation doses received by various anatomic structures after simulating irradiation with a routine posteroanterior single field (SF) technique and experimental multiple field (MF) technique in a setting of thoracic metastatic spinal disease. METHODS: The computed tomography (CT) data from six previously treated patients with a total of 10 thoracic spinal metastases were used to plan four radiation schemes (SF8 Gy; SF20 Gy; MF8 Gy; and MF20 Gy). Discrete anatomic structures were defined on CT data, including a posterior surgical area, and after simulation the doses received were calculated and compared for the 8 Gy and 20 Gy techniques. RESULTS: With the experimental MF technique, a clinically relevant dose could be delivered to the affected vertebra, whereas the dose received at the (prospective) surgical area could be significantly reduced compared with the SF technique. The dose received at the nontarget tissues fell below the threshold level for clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: This radiation planning study showed the feasibility of sparing the surgical area while delivering an adequate dose to affected vertebrae in thoracic metastatic spinal disease.