Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Abnorm Child Psychol ; 47(3): 405-419, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30079436

ABSTRACT

Longitudinal studies on the course of neurocognitive functioning of children with ADHD and their unaffected siblings are scarce. Also, it is unclear to what extent that course is related to ADHD outcomes. A carefully phenotyped large sample of 838 Caucasian participants (ADHD-combined type: n = 339, unaffected siblings: n = 271, controls: n = 228; mean age at baseline = 11.4 years, mean age at follow-up = 17.3 years, SD = 3.2) was used to investigate differences in the course of neurocognitive functioning of ADHD affected and unaffected siblings versus controls, and to investigate the relationship between neurocognitive change and ADHD outcomes. At baseline, an aggregated measure of overall neurocognitive functioning and eight neurocognitive measures of working memory, timing (speed/variability), motor control, and intelligence were investigated. Outcomes at follow-up were dimensional measures of ADHD symptom severity and the Kiddie-Global Assessment Scale (K-GAS) for overall functioning. At follow up, affected and unaffected siblings trended to, or fully caught up with performance levels of controls on four (44.4%) and five (55.6%) of the nine dependent variables, respectively. In contrast, performance in remaining key neurocognitive measures (i.e. verbal working memory, variability in responding) remained impaired at follow-up. Change in neurocognitive functioning was not related to ADHD outcomes. Our results question the etiological link between neurocognitive deficits and ADHD outcomes in adolescents and young adults.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Siblings , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/complications , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Young Adult
2.
Genes Brain Behav ; 15(7): 627-36, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27391809

ABSTRACT

The glucocorticoid receptor plays a pivotal role in the brain's response to stress; a haplotype of functional polymorphisms in the NR3C1 gene encoding this receptor has been associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene polymorphism 5-HTTLPR is known to influence the relation between stress exposure and ADHD severity, which may be partly because of its reported effects on glucocorticoid levels. We therefore investigated if NR3C1 moderates the relation of stress exposure with ADHD severity and brain structure, and the potential role of 5-HTTLPR. Neuroimaging, genetic and stress exposure questionnaire data were available for 539 adolescents and young adults participating in the multicenter ADHD cohort study NeuroIMAGE (average age: 17.2 years). We estimated the effects of genetic variation in NR3C1 and 5-HTT, stress exposure and their interactions on ADHD symptom count and gray matter volume. We found that individuals carrying the ADHD risk haplotype of NR3C1 showed significantly more positive relation between stress exposure and ADHD severity than non-carriers. This gene-environment interaction was significantly stronger for 5-HTTLPR L-allele homozygotes than for S-allele carriers. These two- and three-way interactions were reflected in the gray matter volume of the cerebellum, parahippocampal gyrus, intracalcarine cortex and angular gyrus. Our findings illustrate how genetic variation in the stress response pathway may influence the effects of stress exposure on ADHD severity and brain structure. The reported interplay between NR3C1 and 5-HTT may further explain some of the heterogeneity between studies regarding the role of these genes and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/genetics , Brain/anatomy & histology , Brain/physiopathology , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Stress, Psychological/genetics , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/pathology , Cohort Studies , Female , Gene Frequency , Gene-Environment Interaction , Genetic Variation , Haplotypes , Humans , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/physiopathology , Male , Pituitary-Adrenal System/physiopathology , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Stress, Psychological/metabolism , Young Adult
3.
Transl Psychiatry ; 6: e771, 2016 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27045841

ABSTRACT

Little is known about the causes of individual differences in reward sensitivity. We investigated gene-environment interactions (GxE) on behavioral and neural measures of reward sensitivity, in light of the differential susceptibility theory. This theory states that individuals carrying plasticity gene variants will be more disadvantaged in negative, but more advantaged in positive environments. Reward responses were assessed during a monetary incentive delay task in 178 participants with and 265 without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), from N=261 families. We examined interactions between variants in candidate plasticity genes (DAT1, 5-HTT and DRD4) and social environments (maternal expressed emotion and peer affiliation). HTTLPR short allele carriers showed the least reward speeding when exposed to high positive peer affiliation, but the most when faced with low positive peer affiliation or low maternal warmth. DAT1 10-repeat homozygotes displayed similar GxE patterns toward maternal warmth on general task performance. At the neural level, DRD4 7-repeat carriers showed the least striatal activation during reward anticipation when exposed to high maternal warmth, but the most when exposed to low warmth. Findings were independent of ADHD severity. Our results partially confirm the differential susceptibility theory and indicate the importance of positive social environments in reward sensitivity and general task performance for persons with specific genotypes.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/genetics , Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Maternal Behavior , Peer Group , Receptors, Dopamine D4/genetics , Reward , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnostic imaging , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Case-Control Studies , DNA Copy Number Variations , Female , Functional Neuroimaging , Gene Frequency , Gene-Environment Interaction , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Homozygote , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Neostriatum/diagnostic imaging , Neostriatum/physiopathology , Neuronal Plasticity/genetics , Young Adult
4.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 26(4): 674-83, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899587

ABSTRACT

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has revealed white matter abnormalities in individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Stimulant treatment may affect such abnormalities. The current study investigated associations between long-term stimulant treatment and white matter integrity within the frontal-striatal and mesolimbic pathways, in a large sample of children, adolescents and young adults with ADHD. Participants with ADHD (N=172; mean age 17, range 9-26) underwent diffusion-weighted MRI scanning, along with an age- and gendermatched group of 96 control participants. Five study-specific white matter tract masks (orbitofrontal-striatal, orbitofrontal-amygdalar, amygdalar-striatal, dorsolateral-prefrontal-striatal and medialprefrontal-striatal) were created. First we analyzed case-control differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) within each tract. Second, FA and MD in each tract was predicted from cumulative stimulant intake within the ADHD group. After correction for multiple testing, participants with ADHD showed reduced FA in the orbitofrontal-striatal pathway (p=0.010, effect size=0.269). Within the ADHD group, higher cumulative stimulant intake was associated with lower MD in the same pathway (p=0.011, effect size=-0.164), but not with FA. The association between stimulant treatment and orbitofrontal-striatal MD was of modest effect size. It fell short of significance after adding ADHD severity or ADHD type to the model (p=0.036 and p=0.094, respectively), while the effect size changed little. Our findings are compatible with stimulant treatment enhancing orbitofrontal-striatal white matter connectivity, and emphasize the importance of the orbitofrontal cortex and its connections in ADHD. Longitudinal studies including a drug-naïve baseline assessment are needed to distinguish between-subject variability in ADHD severity from treatment effects.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Corpus Striatum/drug effects , Neural Pathways/drug effects , Prefrontal Cortex/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Anisotropy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/pathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Corpus Striatum/pathology , Corpus Striatum/physiology , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Neural Pathways/pathology , Neural Pathways/physiology , Neuroimaging , Prefrontal Cortex/pathology , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , White Matter/drug effects , White Matter/pathology , White Matter/physiology , Young Adult
5.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 24(8): 959-68, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25395383

ABSTRACT

Meta-analyses suggest normalizing effects of methylphenidate on structural fronto-striatal abnormalities in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A subgroup of patients receives atypical antipsychotics concurrent with methylphenidate. Long-term safety and efficacy of combined treatment are unknown. The current study provides an initial investigation of structural brain correlates of combined methylphenidate and antipsychotic treatment in patients with ADHD. Structural magnetic resonance imaging was obtained in 31 patients who had received combined methylphenidate and antipsychotic treatment, 31 matched patients who had received methylphenidate but not antipsychotics, and 31 healthy controls (M age 16.7 years). We analyzed between-group effects in total cortical and subcortical volume, and in seven frontal cortical and eight subcortical-limbic volumes of interest, each involved in dopaminergic neurotransmission. Patients in the combined treatment group, but not those in the methylphenidate only group, showed a reduction in total cortical volume compared to healthy controls (Cohen's d = 0.69, p < 0.004), which was apparent in most frontal volumes of interest. Further, the combined treatment group, but not the methylphenidate group, showed volume reduction in bilateral ventral diencephalon (Left Cohen's d = 0.48, p < 0.04; Right Cohen's d = 0.46, p < 0.05) and the left thalamus (Cohen's d = 0.47, p < 0.04). These findings may indicate antipsychotic treatment counteracting the normalizing effects of methylphenidate on brain structure. However, it cannot be ruled out that pre-existing clinical differences between both patient groups may have resulted in anatomical differences at the time of scanning. The absence of an untreated ADHD group hinders unequivocal interpretation and implications of our findings.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Brain/drug effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Attention , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/pathology , Brain/metabolism , Brain/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Corpus Striatum/drug effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
6.
Brain Cogn ; 71(3): 387-96, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19665830

ABSTRACT

Valence and arousal are thought to be the primary dimensions of human emotion. However, the degree to which valence and arousal interact in determining brain responses to emotional pictures is still elusive. This functional MRI study aimed to delineate neural systems responding to valence and arousal, and their interaction. We measured neural activation in healthy females (N=23) to affective pictures using a 2 (Valence) x 2 (Arousal) design. Results show that arousal was preferentially processed by middle temporal gyrus, hippocampus and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Regions responding to negative valence included visual and lateral prefrontal regions, positive valence activated middle temporal and orbitofrontal areas. Importantly, distinct arousal-by-valence interactions were present in anterior insula (negative pictures), and in occipital cortex, parahippocampal gyrus and posterior cingulate (positive pictures). These data demonstrate that the brain not only differentiates between valence and arousal but also responds to specific combinations of these two, thereby highlighting the sophisticated nature of emotion processing in (female) human subjects.


Subject(s)
Arousal/physiology , Brain/physiology , Emotions/physiology , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Attention/physiology , Brain Mapping , Facial Expression , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Photic Stimulation
7.
Phys Med Biol ; 46(7): 1737-51, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11474922

ABSTRACT

A method is described to derive source and conductivity estimates in a simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis. In addition the covariance matrix of the estimates is derived. Simulation studies with a concentric spheres model and a more realistic boundary element model indicate that this method has several advantages, even if only a few EEG sensors are added to a MEG configuration. First, a simultaneous analysis profits from the 'preferred' location directions of MEG and EEG. Second, deep sources can be estimated quite accurately, which is an advantage compared to MEG. Third, superficial sources profit from accurate MEG location and from accurate EEG moment. Fourth, the radial source component can be estimated, which is an advantage compared to MEG. Fifth, the conductivities can be estimated. It is shown that conductivity estimation gives a substantial increase in precision, even if the conductivities are not identified appropriately. An illustrative analysis of empirical data supports these findings.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography/methods , Magnetoencephalography/methods , Statistics as Topic/methods , Computer Simulation , Humans , Models, Statistical , Models, Theoretical , Monte Carlo Method
8.
Biol Psychol ; 45(1-3): 183-215, 1997 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9083650

ABSTRACT

A recent development in the cognitive modelling of visual selective attention is the incorporation of design principles derived from the neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of the primate visual system. In this paper, we describe these recent 'neurocognitive' models in more detail, point out the underlying neurobiological principles, and show that in all cases attention is implemented as an energetical resource which can be directed to representations and pathways in the system. In the second part of the paper, we specify the predictions derived from this 'energy hypothesis', and evaluate available data pertaining to this issue. We present new analyses of electrophysiological data in order to directly test the hypothesis that attention modulates feature-specific representations. It will be shown that in the case of sustained spatial attention, the data are in agreement with this hypothesis, whereas in the case of nonspatial attention, there is no evidence of a modulation of feature-specific pathways by attention.


Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Cognition/physiology , Brain Mapping , Evoked Potentials , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Nerve Net
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...